Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.3 on the FTP site

I got the first BUG. YE Ok, it's just the JAVA GUI, but it's something they should see at the first check. Try to open the Activity Monitor, Filter, Advanced Search and then try to do a search for a Policy. This really sucks. Cheers Max ___

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.3 on the FTP site

On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Haberl, Max wrote: I got the first BUG. YE Ok, it's just the JAVA GUI, but it's something they should see at the first check. Try to open the Activity Monitor, Filter, Advanced Search and then try to do a search for a Policy. This really sucks. Cheers Max

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.3 on the FTP site

OK, so you really want to know right ? Its a numeric value. :-) perfect for those who have just numbers as policyname. some other fields like start time and end time have also a wrong field types. i don't use the rest, but i have around 8000 sql Backtrack jobs to hide. Cheers Max

[Veritas-bu] BESR vs NB BMR

we use bmr for netbackup but i would like to know what people think of backup exec system recovery. does anyone have experience with both? +-- |This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central. |Forward SPAM to [EMAIL

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.2 upgrade failing

Check out this doc. http://seer.entsupport.symantec.com/docs/295230.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Haskins, Steve Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 8:05 PM To: veritas-bu@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.2 upgrade

[Veritas-bu] Netbackup migration from 5.0 to 6.5, with server name change

I'm still worried about two things, architecturely I'm changing from one single master/media to two seperate server (one master and one media), in additional the new master and media server name is completely new. besides bpmedia -movedb, and adding the FORCE_RESTORE_MEDIA_SERVER to the

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.3 on the FTP site

Hi Max- I don't see what you're seeing. I launch jnbSA on my 6.5.3 master server... Activity Monitor node... View -- Filter Advanced tab set the Field: to Policy --- I get string comparisons like starts with or contains How does this differ from what you're doing? thanks rob On Wed, Dec

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.3 on the FTP site

The filter works for me both in the Java and Windows gui at 6.5.3. Did you update Java on the master server or your local Java client if you are running off your workstation? Geoff Stafford Barclaycard US Data Protection Engineering office: mobile: Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2008 14:59:24 +0100 From:

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.3 on the FTP site

Sounds like you didn't update your Java binaries on your workstation to me. -- gabriel rosenkoetter Radian Group Inc, Senior Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED], 215 231 1556 -Original Message- From: Haberl, Max [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 9:21 AM To:

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup migration from 5.0 to 6.5, with server name change

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 10:03 AM, kxie [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I'm still worried about two things, architecturely I'm changing from one single master/media to two seperate server (one master and one media), in additional the new master and media server name is completely new. Changing the

Re: [Veritas-bu] bocada software for monitoring

I don't know how long ago you did that, but there IS a web interface for BocadaI was using it at my last job. Stuart Liddle | Senior Consultant GlassHouse Technologies, Inc. From: [EMAIL

[Veritas-bu] Master server...Hardware migration

Greetings good people. Long time lurker, first time caller so to speak. So thanks in advance Currently running 2 x NBU master domains(prod,nonprod). Both NBU 6.5.2 on 2k3 x64 enterprise in a master/media active/passive MSCS clusters. There is the need however to do some hardware juggling.

[Veritas-bu] Upgrading to 6.5.3

Do I need to upgrade all my media servers the same time as the master server or can the master server run 6.5.3 while the media servers run 6.5.0 for a few days? Oh yea they are all windows server 2k3 Doug Preston -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

[Veritas-bu] Upgrading to 6.5.3

Do I need to upgrade all my media servers the same time as the master server or can the master server run 6.5.3 while the media servers run 6.5.0 for a few days? Oh yea they are all windows server 2k3 Doug Preston -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [Veritas-bu] BESR vs NB BMR

Hi, We use BESR for backing up the c:\ drive of our Windows servers. It is very good, backups are easy, restores work and management through the management console is very easy. The only real problems we have with it are that occasionally the service will hang on a client requiring a

Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading to 6.5.3

You can always leave media servers (and clients) down-revved, but you'll be missing the features provided by the intervening backups (ie, don't expect to shoot Exchange 2007 CCR backups or granular restores through them). Also, if you have some Windows media servers that you use as management

Re: [Veritas-bu] Upgrading to 6.5.3

Yes, NBU supports the Master server at the same or higher revision than the Media servers. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS ▪ Sr. Storage Engineer ▪ SunGard Availability Services ▪ 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 ▪ 281-584-4693 Keeping People and Information Connected® ▪

[Veritas-bu] Upgrade to 6.5.3

I have a Linux SUSE Master Server, 2.4 kernel, that is at Enterprise Server 6.5.2 . The only add-on I have is the vault option. I am upgrading to 6.5.3 . I checked the Symantec 6.5.3 Release Update pages @ Document 315028 and it does not say that there is a vault add-on upgrade. Can anyone

Re: [Veritas-bu] 6.5.3 on the FTP site

I got the first BUG. YE Ok, it's just the JAVA GUI, but it's something they should see at the first check. Try to open the Activity Monitor, Filter, Advanced Search and then try to do a search for a Policy. This really sucks. You remembered to apply the JAV patch?

Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup migration from 5.0 to 6.5, with server name change

We have changed the name of our master server, however to Netbackup it is still the original name, which we have achieved through the use of DNS Kate -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of kxie Sent: Thursday, 4 December 2008 3:04 AM To: