Re: [Veritas-ha] Naming conventions for VCS; VCS style guide?

2007-04-24 Thread Jim Senicka
comments below _ From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colb, Andrew Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 2:14 PM To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu Subject: [Veritas-ha] Naming conventions for VCS; VCS style guide? All, We are about to initiate and upgrade sever

[Veritas-ha] Naming conventions for VCS; VCS style guide?

2007-04-24 Thread Colb, Andrew
All, We are about to initiate and upgrade several VCS clusters. The plan for these upgrades will enable us to build/test in parallel with existing production clusters and to revisit our traditional cluster nomenclature and naming conventions. Our configuration has a five-node production Sol

Re: [Veritas-ha] Resource Group Dependencies

2007-04-24 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:59:35AM -0400, Jim Senicka wrote: > We are not planning to address that in VCS at this time. (Multiple > children). > Please have your account team contact me inside Symantec? Can do, although I think that I can work around it with Proxy resources for the zones, so it's

Re: [Veritas-ha] Resource Group Dependencies

2007-04-24 Thread Jim Senicka
We are not planning to address that in VCS at this time. (Multiple children). Please have your account team contact me inside Symantec? Also, what are you running that a 40 second shutdown is too long? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ce

[Veritas-ha] Resource Group Dependencies

2007-04-24 Thread Ceri Davies
I note that there is a restriction that a group may have only one child group; is there any future in which this might be relaxed? As a usage case, this is why I want this: I have a multi-node cluster in which I have multiple zones on each node, and fail applications over between the zones.