I note that there is a restriction that a group may have only one child
group; is there any future in which this might be relaxed?
As a usage case, this is why I want this: I have a multi-node cluster
in which I have multiple zones on each node, and fail applications over
between the zones.
We are not planning to address that in VCS at this time. (Multiple
children).
Please have your account team contact me inside Symantec?
Also, what are you running that a 40 second shutdown is too long?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 09:59:35AM -0400, Jim Senicka wrote:
We are not planning to address that in VCS at this time. (Multiple
children).
Please have your account team contact me inside Symantec?
Can do, although I think that I can work around it with Proxy resources
for the zones, so it's
All,
We are about to initiate and upgrade several VCS clusters. The plan for
these upgrades will enable us to build/test in parallel with existing
production clusters and to revisit our traditional cluster nomenclature
and naming conventions.
Our configuration has a five-node production
comments below
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colb,
Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 2:14 PM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-ha] Naming conventions for VCS; VCS style guide?
All,
We are about to initiate and upgrade
