On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 10:37:08AM -0400, Paul Robertson wrote:
> We recently experienced a Cisco network issue which prevented all
> nodes in that subnet from accessing the default gateway for about a
> minute.
>
> The Solaris nodes which run probe-based IPMP reported that all
> interfaces had fa
rks to be lost, perhaps you
> need to address the network issues :-)
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> DeMontier, Frank
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 11:10 AM
> To: Paul Robertson; veritas-ha@mai
s anyways.
Sandeep
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim
Senicka
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 9:53 AM
To: DeMontier, Frank; Paul Robertson; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] IPMultiNICB, mpathd and network outages
I
Buddy,
Thanks for the info.
The "FaultPropagation=0" idea is a good one, but it applies at the
service group level, and cannot be set only for specified resources or
resource types. It's probably better than my ToleranceLimit approach,
since it results in a resfault and will therefore run our res
Some notes inline.
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Paul Robertson <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We recently experienced a Cisco network issue which prevented all
> nodes in that subnet from accessing the default gateway for about a
> minute.
>
> The Solaris nodes which run probe-based IPMP repor
, 2008 11:10 AM
To: Paul Robertson; veritas-ha@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-ha] IPMultiNICB, mpathd and network outages
FaultPropagation=0 should do it.
Buddy DeMontier
State Street Global Advisors
Infrastructure Technical Services
Boston Ma 02111
-Original Message-
From
FaultPropagation=0 should do it.
Buddy DeMontier
State Street Global Advisors
Infrastructure Technical Services
Boston Ma 02111
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Robertson
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 10:37 AM
To: veritas-ha@mailman.e
