Hello,
We are running Veritas Volume Manager 5.1SP1 on solaris 10 and experiencing
problem to import one 4TByte disk group, which has two concatenated 2T disks.
The alerts(on our Veritas Operations Manager console when rebooting server) are
"disk asm_25000_33 import failed". After server up, I
here also.
>
>
>
> Stuart
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:
> veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] *On Behalf Of *Collin
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 31 March 2010 2:09 AM
> *To:* William Havey
>
[mailto:veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Collin
Sent: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 2:09 AM
To: William Havey
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVm
Sorry for any confusion...
I've got several powerpath devices from a dead system that I'
Is I/O Fencing in place in the cluster? If so, then, if those devices you
are attempting to mount have registration keys on them which are unknown to
gab, gab tells had about the unknown keys, had stops thus bringing down port
h, and the system panics.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Collin wro
Couple questions:
Are the underlying volumes VxVM volumes? If so, why are you not mounting
the /dev/vx/dsk/DGNAME/volname objects?
If the devices actually /are/ powerpath devices (i.e., they're
metadevices coalescing the underlying EMC LUN paths), why aren't you
mounting the powerpath device
Sorry for any confusion...
I've got several powerpath devices from a dead system that I'm mounting
temporarily on one node in my cluster. I run a devfsadm -Cv and vxdctl
enable. After that I can see the powerpath devices listed as...
emc_clarrion0_10 auto:none - -online in
The original message states "mount these disks as
/dev/vx/dmp/_Xs6 ". Perhaps this is normal behavior. Mounts are
of devices which receive I/O. A "/dev/vx/dmp/..." device entry isn't I/O
capable.
I think a clearer statement of what Collin intends to do is needed.
Bill
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:0
Hello,
Panic string and previous messages usually helps to understand cause.. Release
notes to RP2-RP3 also provides short descriptions of fixed issues like "Fixed
the cause of a system panic when mutex_panic() was called from
vol_rwsleep_wrlock()."
On 29.03.2010, at 19:02, Collin wrote:
> I'
Collin,
Do you have ASL ( Array Support Library) installed?
Aleksandr
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Brian Wilson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Collin wrote:
>
>> I've got the following
>>
>> Solaris 10
>> VxVM 5.0MP3RP1HF12
>>
>> I have a number of mount points that a
On Mar 29, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Collin wrote:
I've got the following
Solaris 10
VxVM 5.0MP3RP1HF12
I have a number of mount points that are being migrated from /dev/
dsk/cXtXdXsX to clustered mount points.
I'm guessing you mean 'clustered' in the sense of in a cluster -
failo
I've got the following
Solaris 10
VxVM 5.0MP3RP1HF12
I have a number of mount points that are being migrated from
/dev/dsk/cXtXdXsX to clustered mount points. The problem I'm having is if I
mount these disk in the /dev/dsk/cXtXdXsX format I run the risk that if
something were to caus
I've tested this with heavy IO to vx volumes and have no problems. So this is
online procedure.
With regards,
--
Anton Pavlenko
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 08:50:12AM +0100, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
> Hi Anton,
>
> how about:
>
> rm /dev/vx/dmp/*
> rm /dev/vx/rdmp/*
>
> Regards
> Przemek
>
>
Hi Anton,
how about:
rm /dev/vx/dmp/*
rm /dev/vx/rdmp/*
Regards
Przemek
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 06:06:07PM +0300, Antony Pavlenko wrote:
> Hello.
> This procedure is online.
> I've tested it now more then 10 times "on production server where lots of
> Oracle databases are working".
>
> Anton
Hello.
This procedure is online.
I've tested it now more then 10 times "on production server where lots of
Oracle databases are working".
Anton Pavlenko
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:29:58PM +0100, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it happened on production server where lots of Oracle dat
Hi all,
it happened on production server where lots of Oracle databases are working all
the time
and finding maintenence window longer then 15 minutes is ... :-(
let alone rebooting server.
Any _online_ procedure ?
Regards
Przemek
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 01:15:22PM +0300, Antony Pavlenko wrote
It is a new feature :-)
You need to cleanup solaris device tree after disk removal and before you add
any new disks if you want to use the same host LUN.
After some experiments and reboot as the results of this experiments we have
found correct cleanup procedure.
For me it works and after thi
I had the same issue on a CVM/CFS cluster node and the issue was not
resolved with all the recommended steps.
Apparently the error disappeared after the reconfiguration reboot of the
node. Not sure if this is a new bug in 5MP3RP1?
Rudra
2009/10/27
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:41:40PM +0100, prz
In my previous post, I omitted the "vxdisk rm" step. Following the
procedure hinted at in the INFO message:
1) devfsadm -c disks
2) vxdisk rm c5t0d25
3) vxdctl enable
2009/10/27 :
> Sorry, I have forgotten: this is Solaris 10 + Veritas 5 MP3.
>
> # vxdiskconfig
> VxVM INFO V-5-2-1401 This comm
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 02:41:40PM +0100, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to add to a server new LUNs but face the following problem:
>
> server:/root# vxdctl enable
> VxVM vxdctl ERROR V-5-1-0 Data Corruption Protection Activated - User
> Corrective Action Needed
> VxVM vx
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:46:15AM +0900, Romeo Theriault wrote:
> >
> > To recover, first ensure that the OS device tree is up to date (requires OS
> > specific commands).
> >
>
> You may want to try: devfsadm -C
>
> This will clean up your device tree. From the devfsadm man page:
>
> -C
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> [mailto:veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of William Havey
> Sent: 26 October 2009 14:17
> To: przemol...@poczta.fm
> Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject
Sorry, I have forgotten: this is Solaris 10 + Veritas 5 MP3.
# vxdiskconfig
VxVM INFO V-5-2-1401 This command may take a few minutes to complete
execution
Executing Solaris command: devfsadm (part 1 of 2) at 09:22:26 CET
Executing VxVM command: vxdctl enable (part 2 of 2) at 09:22:31 CET
V
>
> To recover, first ensure that the OS device tree is up to date (requires OS
> specific commands).
>
You may want to try: devfsadm -C
This will clean up your device tree. From the devfsadm man page:
-C Cleanup mode. Prompt devfsadm to cleanup dangling
/dev links that
] On Behalf Of William Havey
Sent: 26 October 2009 14:17
To: przemol...@poczta.fm
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM vxdctl ERROR V-5-1-0 Data CorruptionProtection
Activated - problem
You have the second part of the error message covered but the "ensure
t
You have the second part of the error message covered but the "ensure
the OS..." part can't be ignored.
If Solaris, run vxdiskconfig
If HP-UX run insf -eC disk
IF AIX, run cfgmgr
Then run vxdctl enable.
HTH,
Bill
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to add to a se
Hello,
I am trying to add to a server new LUNs but face the following problem:
server:/root# vxdctl enable
VxVM vxdctl ERROR V-5-1-0 Data Corruption Protection Activated - User
Corrective Action Needed
VxVM vxdctl INFO V-5-1-0 To recover, first ensure that the OS device tree is
up to date (re
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Marianne Van Den Berg
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM patch 122058-12 requires obsoleted patch
128306-05
Hi Marianne,
Installing the latest patch should be sufficient if you are getting only
this patch dependecy problem for installing SF 50MP3 RP2.
Check this URL
- On Thu, 9/10/09, Marianne Van Den Berg wrote:
From: Marianne Van Den Berg
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM patch 122058-12 requires obsoleted patch 128306-05
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Date: Thursday, September 10, 2009, 3:33 AM
Hi all
I'm trying to install SF50MP3 R
Hi all
I'm trying to install SF50MP3 RP2 on our Solaris 10 lab machines.
VxVM patch 122058-12 fails to completely install as it requires
obsoleted patch 128306-05.
My VxVM package shows PStamp as RP2, but Status says partially
installed.
I'm about to download and install patch 138269-02 (repla
Hi Friends,
any body have VXVM , Cluster CBTs? i am ready to pay..
--
Regards,
Sekhar.
___
Veritas-vx maillist - Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailman/listinfo/veritas-vx
Hi --
Is there any way to "copy" the configuration copy ( nconfig ) and log
copies ( nlog ) to another disk in the diskgroup?
I took a "shot-gun" approach earlier and just changed the nconfig total
and nlog totals using vxedit and a config/log copy were put on the 1 of
the 3 disks I am moving
As others have pointed out, we don't really know which hardware and software
resources you've got at disposal.
- Most generic solution would be to use plexes to migrate the data.
- You'll need to mess around with zoning and masking on the SAN side
regardless of what option you take
- BCVs are goin
Well,
Like Andrey said, your not being very specific on what you want the
end state to be or what versions you have, etc. That said, are BCV's
an option? They're tailor made for this kind of stuff. The array
would do all the work for you and the systems could be up while you're
doing
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM -- "Moving" Large Amounts of Data
Hi all.
Sorry about the vague subject.
Here is the situation and I am really looking for any ideas or comments on the
following:
I have inherited 20TBs of data split between 2 Servers ( Solaris/Sunfire/Sol8)
E
Hi all.
Sorry about the vague subject.
Here is the situation and I am really looking for any ideas or comments on the
following:
I have inherited 20TBs of data split between 2 Servers ( Solaris/Sunfire/Sol8)
Each Server has 2 diskgroups.
Oracle and Sybase Filesystems and Raw Volumes. ( Mixed b
Finally got this working - thanks to Symantec support.
I've never had to go through quite this process before to use a lun, but
then again, I've never used an EFI labeled lun before either.
First, format the lun using the /dev/vx/rdmp name, and set the size of
partition 0 to 0tb, and label the d
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Wednesday, 28 January, 2009 12:14:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM can't use 1 TB luns
This is the types of errors I've been seeing all day:
# vxdisk -f init fas60800_0 type=auto format=sliced
VxVM vxdisk ERROR V-5-1-5433 Device fas60800_0: init failed
t;
> [mailto:veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Bryan
> Bahnmiller
>
>> Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 8:33 AM
>> To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>> Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM can't use 1 TB luns
>>
>> All,
>>
>> We have
>-Original Message-
>From: veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
[mailto:veritas-vx-boun...@mailman.eng.auburn.edu] On Behalf Of Bryan
Bahnmiller
>Sent: Wednesday, 28 January 2009 8:33 AM
>To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
>Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM can't
All,
We have several NetApp luns zoned on our Sun servers. Some are on the
order of 100 GB, but we have 7 that are 1 TB. So by default Solaris puts
the EFI label on the disk. Well, I can bring the smaller luns into a dg,
but the 1 TB luns will not work no matter what I try.
# vxdisk -f init fas
Hi all.
I have installed Vrts 5.0 but without a rootdg and so without encap del root
disk because I have Sun Blade T6320 with Hw raid for boot disks.
After the installation and the reboot I keep getting this message
VxVM vxdctl ERROR V-5-1-1589 enable failed: Volboot file not loaded
and so vxconfig
I have a Sun server which has 12 luns from a Clariion array presented
to it. I created Vx volumes on the PowerPath devices.
Then I zoned in 9 more luns from a 2nd Clariion array. Solaris sees
the devices, PowerPath has created the emcpower devices and VxVM sees
the emcpower devices. But I can'
us know, if you still have the issue after verifying the
>> above.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -kiru
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan
>> Bahnmiller
>> Sent: Tuesda
increase to more than 20 minutes. So, if nothing happen on the console for
several
minutes then VxVM is starting. The problem does NOT exist with Solaris Volume
Manager.
--- On Tue, 10/7/08, Andrey Dmitriev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Andrey Dmitriev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: R
PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan
> Bahnmiller
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:42 AM
> To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM disk group commands take too long
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have a situation where one sy
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bryan
Bahnmiller
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 11:42 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM disk group commands take too long
Hello all,
I have a situation where one system is taking a long time to scan for
disk groups. I have a VCS
: [Veritas-vx] VxVM disk group commands take too long
Hello all,
I have a situation where one system is taking a long time to scan for disk
groups. I have a VCS cluster in a 4+1 configuration. I have recently added the
last production node to the cluster. After the disks were presented to the
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 5.0 and 4.x keys
Are the keys for 4.x and 5.0 compatable
Richard Bonfoey - Unix Systems Administrator
Alteon Training LLC
PO Box 34787, MC 20-74
Seattle, WA 98124-1787
Work 206-662-8006
Cell 206-218-4919
Hello all,
I have a situation where one system is taking a long time to scan for
disk groups. I have a VCS cluster in a 4+1 configuration. I have
recently added the last production node to the cluster. After the disks
were presented to the failover node, it took a long time for any Vx
commands
Are the keys for 4.x and 5.0 compatable
Richard Bonfoey - Unix Systems Administrator
Alteon Training LLC
PO Box 34787, MC 20-74
Seattle, WA 98124-1787
Work 206-662-8006
Cell 206-218-4919
___
Veritas-vx maillist - Veritas-vx@mailman
pdate:time=1217739597 seqno=0.854
ssb: actual_seqno=0.4
with regards,
Harindra.
From: Amit Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 September 2008 13:45
To: Harindra Patel
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi ,
ava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 04 September 2008 14:15
> *To:* Harindra Patel
> *Cc:* veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It is not going to create any problem for any of the volumes
&
]
Sent: 04 September 2008 14:15
To: Harindra Patel
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi,
It is not going to create any problem for any of the volumes
running as per my understanding , it will only stop changing the ssb id of
Hello,
Please enlighten me if the HBA information provided by VxVM DMP is HBA
port information or HBA Card information.
Regards,
Sweta Menon
L&T Infotech
Manapakkam
Chennai
Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd.
www.Lntinfotech.com
This Document is classified as:
L&T Infotech Proprietary L&T Inf
ndra Patel
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi,
It is not going to create any problem for any of the volumes
running as per my understanding , it will only stop changing the ssb id of
diskgroups with newly added disks.
Regards
Amit
Server is in production
vxdg -g diskgroup set ssb=off can create problem to already running disks ?
Harindra.
From: Amit Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 September 2008 14:03
To: Harindra Patel
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split
Hello,
Please enlighten me if the HBA information provided by VxVM DMP is HBA
port information or HBA Card information.
Regards,
Sweta Menon
L&T Infotech
Manapakkam
Chennai
Larsen & Toubro Infotech Ltd.
www.Lntinfotech.com
This Document is classified as:
L&T Infotech Proprietary L&T Inf
: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi Harindra ,
This error u r getting because u have already cleared
all the data of the disk in the begining itself .By running vxdisksetup -i
C#T#D# . that has wiped out the entire data of both public and private
region
n production
>
> vxdg -g diskgroup set ssb=off can create problem to already running disks ?
>
>
>
> Harindra.
>
>
>
> *From:* Amit Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 04 September 2008 14:03
> *To:* Harindra Patel
> *Cc:* veritas-vx@mailman.eng.a
disk and why it's giving me error as new disk even?
>
> Harindra.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Amit Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 04 September 2008 13:09
> *To:* Harindra Patel
> *Cc:* veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Ve
I want to add as new disk and why it's giving me error as new disk even?
Harindra.
From: Amit Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 September 2008 13:09
To: Harindra Patel
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi Har
mber 2008 12:47
> *To:* Harindra Patel
> *Cc:* veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> You should'nt run vxdisksetup on that instead u should have tried
> adding the disk after doing
>
> vxdisk -f init c#t
000
>
> Multipathing information:
>
> numpaths: 1
>
> c3t0d0s2state=enabled
>
>
>
> Harindra.
>
>
>
> *From:* Amit Srivastava [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* 04 September 2008 12:47
> *To:* Harindra Patel
> *Cc:* veritas-vx@mailman.eng.au
@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi,
You should'nt run vxdisksetup on that instead u should have tried
adding the disk after doing
vxdisk -f init c#t#d# privlen=value found from vxdisk list c#t#d#
then try adding the disk from this command
vx
2008 12:47
To: Harindra Patel
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi,
You should'nt run vxdisksetup on that instead u should have tried
adding the disk after doing
vxdisk -f init c#t#d# privlen=value found from vxdisk list c#t#d#
Hi,
You should'nt run vxdisksetup on that instead u should have tried
adding the disk after doing
vxdisk -f init c#t#d# privlen=value found from vxdisk list c#t#d#
then try adding the disk from this command
vxdg -g diskgroup -k adddisk diskname=c#t#d#
and then start the volume force fully
v
Hi Tim,
I have gone though your problemwhen i tried to add two disk in diskgroup and
i get following same error .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # /usr/lib/vxvm/bin/vxdisksetup -i c3t0d0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # vxdg -g suportaldg adddisk suportaldg02=c3t0d0
VxVM vxdg ERROR V-5-1-10127 associating disk-media
basic information
that exists in public technotes on the topic.
Cheers,
jf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
Bishop
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 7:59 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Serial Split Brain
Hi all,
I'm using VxVM 4.1 MP2 on Solaris 9 and have a strange problem. I'm
trying to add some disks to a diskgroup and I get the following error:
# /usr/lib/vxvm/bin/vxdisksetup -fi c2t216000C0FF892131d10
# /usr/lib/vxvm/bin/vxdisksetup -fi c2t216000C0FF892131d11
# vxdg -g TeachFS-DG adddisk Tea
Hi All,
I have just upgraded a test Solaris 8 server from SF 4.0 to SF 5.0
I used the upgrade_start and upgrade_finish scripts.
Upon doing a reboot vxconfigd does not start.
I can start it by hand and all seems well.
What is wrong?
I get the following error messages on the consol
Hi,
Sorry for crossposting as I am not sure if this is a VCS or VxVM problem.
We have a Veritas Cluster Server 4.0 running on two Solaris 8 (SPARC) nodes.
We had a power outage on one of the nodes A recently, then we started all
the stuff that was on node A on node B. Then we brought back node A
tas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM Compatibility
Antony,
>>You can easily do this and it just work.
Good to know, thanks for the confirmation.
>> Also Sun have SUE disk, which
>>include veritas. Also there is a good instruction how to setup net boot
>
Antony,
>>You can easily do this and it just work.
Good to know, thanks for the confirmation.
>> Also Sun have SUE disk, which
>>include veritas. Also there is a good instruction how to setup net boot
>>( not shure about wan boot) from SUE.
I already heard about SUE - but until now I did not fi
Hello,
You can easily do this and it just work. Also Sun have SUE disk, which
include veritas. Also there is a good instruction how to setup net boot
( not shure about wan boot) from SUE.
--
Antony Pavlenko
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 06:35:05PM +0100, Bernd Schemmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for maintenanc
Not sure if this is a good idea when you want to do maintenance on a
Production box.
Consider this in your design to solve whatever issue you have:
1. Make 1 local disk available, keep it out of control of Veritas.
(altboot)
2. Create all the slices on altboot similar in size as the Root disk bef
Hi,
for maintenance purpose for our Sun Server we have created a Solaris
WANBOOT Image with VxVM 5.0 MP1 included.
The plan for using this WANBOOT Image is as follow:
- boot the Sun machine from the network using this WANBOOT image
- import the rootdg from the local disks
- do what ever necessa
s well and
something must have gotten screwed up there.
Cheers,
- Mike.Myers nwdc.net
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Rumbidzayi Gadhula
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 12:35 AM
> To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
am unable to initialize my disk array under VVM 4.0 (StorageTek D173).
When I select initialize disk veritas says it is unable to read the
disk geometry.
Trying to label the disk fails with Disk unformatted. Trying to format
results in a Read error (failing to read VTOC) with an error code
Hi,
We've done this before to migrate data to new arrays and other servers
a while ago. After the plexes have fully synced you could do this:
- Dissasociate server B's LUNs from the DG:
vxplex -g dis
vxedit -g -fr rm
vxdg -g -k rmdisk
- Now unzone server B's LUNs from server A. (Alternativ
Rajinder Bhalla wrote:
>
> Hi Gurus,
>
>
>
> I have a small problem for which I need your help.
>
>
>
> My requirement is to copy data from one server A to a new server B but
> I have to do it only through Veritas VxVM mirroring. The disks from
> server B are dual zoned with server A. I have
Hi Gurus,
I have a small problem for which I need your help.
My requirement is to copy data from one server A to a new server B but I have
to do it only through Veritas VxVM mirroring. The disks from server B are dual
zoned with server A. I have mirrored the plexes on Server A with the disks fr
n
Sent: 30 October 2007 02:51
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue
Hi,
Thanks for all the replies, I think I have got to know why this is
happening with help from Mark. vxconfigd in debug mode shows that it
fails after it finds a symmetrix VCM
PM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue
Hi,
Thanks for all the replies, I think I have got to know why this is
happening with help from Mark. vxconfigd in debug mode shows that it
fails after it finds a symmetrix VCM device. So I tried to
t
"c3t5006048ACCD1E3C0d2" . Is there any way to overcome the VCM disk from being
scanned by VX?
Any help is appreciated. I do not have the luxury of getting a call raised with
veritas :(
Thanks,
Ashish
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
shish
madhavan
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 9:25 AM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu; Dmitry Glushenok; Mark Alleyne
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue
Thanks for your replies Dmitry and Mark. I had forgotten to run
vxinstall. But even after I had it could not start vxconfigd
ED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CC: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 4.1, vxconfigd issue
>
> Hello,
>
> Have you tried to use vxinstall to do things like creating volboot, removing
> install-db, etcetera?
>
> ashish madhavan wrote:
Hello,
Have you tried to use vxinstall to do things like creating volboot, removing
install-db, etcetera?
ashish madhavan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a Sun 220R to which I have assigned 1000 luns of 45 Mb (this is
> to simulation a case) from a symmetrix. Host details are -
>
> 1. SunOS
aemon; aborting!"
exit 1
fi
VXDCTL_MODE=`/usr/sbin/vxdctl mode | awk '{print $2}'`
if [ "${VXDCTL_MODE}" = 'enabled' ]
then
echo "Volume Manager is enabled."
else
echo "ERROR: Volume Manager is NOT enabled; aborting!"
exit 1
fi
To: Goutham N
Cc: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VXVM unattended installation
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:18:26PM +0530, Goutham N wrote:
>>>>> "N. Goutham" == Goutham N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
N. Goutham> Hi All, I am tryin
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 02:18:26PM +0530, Goutham N wrote:
> "N. Goutham" == Goutham N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
N. Goutham> Hi All, I am trying to do an unattended installation
N. Goutham> of VXVM, VXFS VSF4.1 software. It seems that we can
N. Goutham> do with a response file.
Hi All,
I am trying to do an unattended installation of VXVM, VXFS VSF4.1 software.
It seems that we can do with a response file. Have any one done this
before.
Can you provide your ideas on how you achieved this in your environment.
N. Goutham.
___
Ve
Nath Pankaj-a22823; veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 3.2 is incompatible on Solaris 10
"This package, VxVM 3.2, is only supported on Solaris 2.6, 7,
and 8; however, you appear to be running Solaris 2.10.
That is not a supported version of Solari
10 and no you
can't upgrade from 3.2 to 5.0.
- Original Message
From: Nath Pankaj-a22823 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Tuesday, 14 August, 2007 5:59:14 PM
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 3.2 is incompatible on Solaris 10
Hi,
I have installe
try to LU to u3
...ouch.
No I prefer a solid clean mirror break off or better yet just physically pull
the drive. Simple quick reliable
--Original Message--
From: Darren Dunham
To: Veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Sent: Aug 16, 2007 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Veritas-vx] VxVM encapsulated
> If the OS install/upgrade goes badly you may well hose the disk in the
> other disk group. Unless maybe you were to deport it...but then how
> could you boot it...
I was thinking you would remove the (old mirror) disk from the existing
DG, give it to LU for install/upgrade, then create/encap a n
> If you don't do an unencapsulate of the root mirror after you detach it,
> you will have a world of pain if you try to boot from it. See man page
> for vxunroot and there's a procedure for doing this manually floating
> around on the web
Sorta. You can't can't boot from a currently detatche
> Has anyone successfully performed a LiveUpgrade using VxVM encapsulated
> rootdisks? If so, could you please outline the procedure you used to do
> so?
>
> Conceptually, it isn't difficult. Break the plexes on rootdg - remove
> the root mirror disk from rootdg - perform your LiveUpgrade on the
up
NYC-HRA MIS
+1 718 510 8586
Nextel: 172*26*16684
=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Svoboda,
Michael Steven
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2007 1:35 PM
To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM encapsulate
Has anyone successfully performed a LiveUpgrade using VxVM encapsulated
rootdisks? If so, could you please outline the procedure you used to do
so?
Conceptually, it isn't difficult. Break the plexes on rootdg - remove
the root mirror disk from rootdg - perform your LiveUpgrade on the root
mirror
ROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Nath Pankaj-a22823
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 12:59 AM
> To: veritas-vx@mailman.eng.auburn.edu
> Subject: [Veritas-vx] VxVM 3.2 is incompatible on Solaris 10
>
> Hi,
> I have installed Solaris 10 and then while installing the VxVM
> 3
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
