turally
understood norm is that what's not yours is not yours and you must
get permission to use it. To put the responsibility on the creator
to blacklist everyone he doesn't want to grant access is too onerous,
it's too costly.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
that will, hopefully, occur less
and less, I think there remains confusion about licensing and rights
in general.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> They're playing it off of blip, so you are getting credit for th
s). It'll be fun to chatter rant and rave.
email me the details: castingtalent-at-gmail.com I don't check the
capt. Humphreys email as often.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, sull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> life is not perfect. know that.
> rela
this okay, or
would you recommend something else?
Need input.
David
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=12805666/grpspId=1705554021/msgI
d=55383/stime=1169442365/nc1=3848549/nc2=3848642/nc3=3848528>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Domain videos. It's axiomatic that Public
Domain material can never be copyrighted by inclusion in another
format, so when you convert these videos, the underlying data is yours
to use. Hope this contribution is fun and helpful.
-David
said who are you to
> dictate how google retransmits that data. Google isn't making any
> money off of putting that video up on Google Video. In fact, if
> anything they are losing money just by making it available in the
> first place. Bandwidth costs etc. So who should you be
decisions in places like the
> NARA just DON'T UNDERSTAND what's at stake, and what the
> opportunities are.
>
> And I think you're right to be angry at Google, David - they are
> pushing a form of DRM for their own commercial gain when they
> *should* be advisin
That's a good resource. Thanks Josh.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Joshua Kinberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> You can sell media with Cruxy.com, which was developed by Nathan
> Freitas, who is on this list.
> Definitely check it out.
>
> -josh
>
>
> On 1/24/07, Rupert <[EMAIL P
Interesting links. Thanks. The reproduction of Tom Hanks in the 3D
model is scarier to me than the resurection of Orville Redenbacher.
And I love that it took an army of people to produce the popcorn
piece.
--- In
videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "bordercollieaustralianshepherd"
<[EMAIL PR
n opt-in ... Content creators who are
okay with player-adjacent AdSense advertisements because they want
the extra traffic that Magnify may generate will easily be able to
opt in."
So is it an "opt-in" or an "opt-out" strategy for Magnify?
-David
--- In videoblogging@yah
Are we seriously okay with opt-out? A thousand aggregators take your
material and use it however they want. Does anyone have the time to
sift the net and sift those sites to ensure your material is being
used as you have licensed it to be used? A CC, non-commercial
license means you have to
www.videodl.org and media-convert.com might help. videodl.org
returns the address to the actual file. media-convert will convert
it.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Lucas Gonze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On 1/26/07, Philip Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There are two website
Thanks for sharing the news Enric. Here's a transcript of what he
said:
"In terms of paying users revenue against the content that they're
uploading, we're definitely going to move in that direction. But we
didn't want to build a system that was motivated by monetary reward.
We wanted to
to speculate much, balancing adverts so
> they dont alienate viewers, and revenue sharing so it doesnt
alienate
> creators, is the 64 million dollar question right now given that
more
> radical ideas about alternative revenue models are hard to come by.
>
> Cheers
>
>
various terms & conditions
> people are signing up to with hosts, but so long as there are
service
> slike blip trying to do the right thing, I perhaps shouldnt get
caught
> up in the finer details of the purely legal definition side of
things,
> and if the term non-commercial is too n
his kind of sandbox arrangement with blip or other services we use
is inappropriate.
And, again, thanks for your advocacy.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> John,
>
> I'm going to reply to David directly in
l kinds, for all the associated distribution and
> > publicity industries, because the stakes would change. But I
dont see
> > that happening unless any of my doomer scenarios of the future
happen.
> >
> > What a totally different attitude we might have to all forms of
> &
Lucas, I did not, nor did anyone participating in this discussion
make the argument that a third party's profit is necessarily someone
else's loss. No one said any such thing. What many people are
saying is that they don't want others, with most of the emphasis on
corporations, profiting from
Congratulations. That's got to feel good.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Kent Nichols"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I sent this in on Friday...
>
> Hey Guys,
>
> I just wanted to let everyone know that we have signed with
Federated
> Media to handle all of our advertising.
>
> We'r
This comes as no surprise, I suppose. Inevitably the question arises,
what's high quality content? One man's meat is another man's poison,
after all. It will be interesting to see how Google cracks the search
and discovery problem. We already know that automated methods of
assisted discover
It's another contest. I just became aware of it when a friend emailed
me about it. In case anyone is interested, here's the link:
http://www.thelot.com/ Seems like there's lots of contests popping
up. This one's got a million dollar development deal as the prize.
Old school, huh? Why not
What's wrong with you people? That site is offering a "geyser" of
traffic. Don't you know what that means? It can't be the first
definition, "a hot spring intermittently sending up jets of water,"
because nobody wants intermittent watery traffic. It can't be the
second definition of "a hot
a to you. You
can't let that stop you. Creativity is part of the life force. You
know it.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David Howell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> It appears that the problem is that basically anyone can create an
> aggregator and pull fe
Huge fan of music.podshow.com. But it could be clearer. They don't
tell you what license the material is published under. I sent them
an email one time asking for clarification. I asked, "can I use this
in a video that will have advertising associated with it?" They said
something tantamou
Several days ago Lucas characterized those who want to maintain full
copyright control over their works as people engaging
in "victimization." Now Jay you say they are "whining." Gentlemen,
why do you denigrate and deride the people on the opposite side of
the debate from you? I may advocate
This kind of thing always upsets me. The two young men who planted
those toys should have questioned their instructions. The people who
gave them those instructions should have questioned their
instructions and on up the chain of command. There must be a couple
of dozen people (upwards of 10
Jose Gonzales might care that you're using his music in your video no
matter how few people watch your stuff. But he might not. You can
get in touch with him and ask him. But that's probably too much
work. Since there's so much music out there you can use under CC
license from artists who y
don't have your facility for organizing. And
that's why I get a little snappish when I see verbiage being used to
silence others and I raise my voice to say bullshit. Sorry if I took
you out of context.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jay dedman" <[E
The "man on the street" defense of their actions seems hauntingly
stupid ... "they were just doing their jobs, following orders."
I want to see interviews with executives who approved this debacle.
That would be a laugh riot.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "J. Rhett Aultman" <[EMAIL PRO
You wrote "Half of you are crazy, thoughtless, greedy, parochial and
irrational, but only half." Dude the glass is half full. "Only
half?" And let's not forget that great swaths of the population of
other countries are also those things. The French may elect LePen
the next chance they get.
Mine would be similar to Mike Moon's above, except that in addition
to videobloggers I'd stop and talk to random people doing interesting
things or everyday things well with joy. Think Charles Kuralt's "On
the Road," except take it international. If you don't know Charles
Kuralt or his show "
s part of a database of CC stock
footage. Revenue from an ad attached to that piece would go to
support more community media. I shan't belabor the point. Looking
forward to feedback and hoping it's not a totally cockeyed concept, I
remain,
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,
T
is a website where any cute girl under 25 who appears to be not full
of herself is valued, dogs on skateboards are endlessly fascinating,
lighting your farts on fire is high art, and most things displaying
sentential logic or thought requiring more than 20 seconds of
attention are doomed. YouTu
are, after
all, social creatures that crave interaction. Whatever happens, we
live in interesting times.
Cheers!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Meiser" wrote:
>
> Ha! Great Rant!
>
> That was well said David. I can tell by the way it reads that was
written
&
This is good for us. It's probably good for them too (or else they
wouldn't be doing it) since they're #2 and a lot of interesting
material isn't on YouTube yet.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fantastic!
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
e to be a car? Are there not situations in which a plane
is better. Are there not places only a donkey or mule can take you?
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "J. Rhett Aultman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I'm also already on YouTube (
Good luck with your future developments and your mission to "make
independent video on the internet easy to find and share." It's a
worthy mission. Cheers!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Van Dijck"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I just wanted to share this:
> http://mefeedia.com
hether artistic, journalistic, DIY, educational or
fictional. Maybe the word isn't really out yet. Or maybe the
experience of searching and finding this independent media is still a
little bit too much, a little too annoying or enervating and so people
continue to prefer to
Yo Heath don't be a hater. Didn't you read the website? It had lots
of useful information. For example, pay them $3.00 and you can
make "Thousands of Dollars From Other Peoples Efforts" How
much? That's simple. They tell you, "THAT'S THREE MILLION
DOLLARS!" Dude they put that message
Thanks for this Bill. She seems so much more personable in your vlog
then she ever does on television news shows like CNN. Is it possible
that editorial choices being made at network effect the timbre of our
presidential candidates?
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Ca
By watching your video, Randy, I learned you never issued a complaint
to YouTube about that video being stolen. I think you should send
them a notice and get AskTony to take it down . I know you made the
original video as an expression of your freedom to be gay and freedom
to be openly homose
would be
> fascinating at some point in the future. In one of the subtitles
I
> raised the possibility that I might be doing him a great favor by
> exposing him---although, that is an outcome I suspect will not
come
> to pass.
>
> I have had an interesting exchange of e
Ninja may have been stealthy and left Anna totally unaware of the
coitus, but we're sure he left her quite satisfied. Ninja would do
Ninja-else.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Kent Nichols"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Cross Posted at askaninja.c
shows" can be just as personal and revelatory as a "diary"
and a "personal vlog" what is the point of making these
distinctions? Shouldn't we be more concerned with what touches and
inspires us? Epic poetry, diaries, plays, journalism, novels,
documentaries, &
tomorrow, come out and say "Hi." If you're available and
interested, call or email and I'll give you directions to the place
(Upper West). I can be reached at: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 917-769-
7546. Cheers!
-David
P.S. You may have seen some of my work in the past:
capt
27;m out of town. Good luck! :D
>
> --
> billcammack
> http://realfans.tv
>
>
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David"
wrote:
> >
> > Hi all. I am doing a shoot tomorrow - a garden party scene - and
I
> > would love to see some of my
I read on a legal forum that a person in public can have no
expectation of privacy and that, therefore, you can take images of
them. Cartier-Bresson photographs and your videoblog with random
incidental people walking by, therefore, are permissible.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Brook
Joanna Shields of Bebo is quoted in that article as saying "As more
and more interesting content from major media brands becomes
available ..."
REALLY? I've got 1,000 channels and find it extremely difficult to
find anything interesting to watch. There're gobs and gobs of
stultifying treacl
Secret #1 - No reasonably intelligent person needs this
guy's 'secrets' because they're self evident if you spend a moment
thinking about how you could game the system. I mean, multiple
accounts, who ever would have come up with that?
Secret #2 - The message in this piece is ultimately depress
If I could make "Crow Pose" look so easy and fun I'd host a show like
yours too. Good luck!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Jan McLaughlin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Like Irinia said - and you do it so well! Very funny, educational
and
> inspirational.
>
> Jan
>
> On 11/26/07, I
a moratorium on strenuous
arguing.
The good news: the solstice is behind us. The days are getting
longer. Eat. Drink. Commune with friends. Be merry.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Cheryl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In videoblo
ore it expands
again. Or maybe it will contract in numbers before it picks up in
activity again. I still check in from time to time and haven't done
any videoblogging for awhile now.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "andrew michael baron"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-- competition and low barriers to
switching should one need it -- and bad from another -- fractured
audience. The big media companies don't care so much because they've
got the brand strength to guarantee a certain audience.
-David
www.captainhumphreys.com
www.simpledosanddonts.
http://hassleheadnews.blogspot.com and let me know what you think. I
hope you like it.
Cheers,
-David
hen we are bleeding money for a war that appears to be a personal
family vendetta is outrageous and needs to be commented on with
political criticism.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, CarLBanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It is truly quite sad that we couldn't ref
silence
their opinions for your own purposes.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, CarLBanks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your right David, I support Bush and his "corrupt" policies. He may
not be
> our best president, but he's better than the alternatives we
Robyn, you just made a political statement.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Robyn Tippins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I am actually in agreement that I also hope not to hear politics
(or really
> one-sided politics) on the list. Of course, I
somethnig. Maybe
he knows what some of us won't admit: he belongs at the kiddie table.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Irina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> now i'm sorry i even watched that PR video. bill,
> i'm sure it was made with the 40% that's
trying to silence political expression a cold chill runs up
my spine. The suppressors of political expression are invariably the
transgressors of political wrong.
-David
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "missbhavens1969"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right! Okay
t will not spark such strong
feelinglike
> religion..
>
> ;)
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David" wrote:
> >
> > That video (that series of videos) probably cost more than we can
> > imagine and probably more than anyone on this boar
It may seem amazing, but take it from someone who juggles, it's not that impressive. To be really impressed, check out Jason Garfield's version of the Bliss routine http://www.jasongarfield.com/pennradio.html --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joseph Puentes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> > hi
I love a challenge!
David
http://www.bubbaraylove.com/revue.html
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use o
I just emailed them a bill for $68,000.00. It was an arbitrary number
I pulled out of my head.
Think they'll pay?
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> my Blip videos as well.. hmm
&
There were times over the holidays that I felt like I had a sumo
wrestler sitting on my head. Does that still count?
It sucks when this happens. I have a feeling that it's going to become
more often than not now.
So...are we all going to have to keep a lawyer on retainer now? Geez.
David
Sweet. Maybe they will actually pay my $68,000.00 bill I sent them then!
(and then David woke up to the smell of tasty tasty pizza)
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Daniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> http://heavypr.wo
I havent heard anything back from them yet. Maybe they are looking for
their checkbook to send me my $68,000? ha!
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Man, I take a break from the web for a nig
Update.
It appears that all my videos have been remove from their site.
Such a shame too. I was thinking that $68,000 would have made a nice
donation to Blip. Sorry Mike.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "David Howell" <[EMAIL PROT
utube doesn't do that. Myspace is a little different - it's a geek
world of it's own, with RSS, bulletins, pics, videos, etc... but Youtube is
simply a storage place for video (and not the best one, either).
Just some thoughts
David
On 1/5/07, Patrick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You said "and the humans, what they say
and how they communicate with others and feedback is what really
attracts me to all this, not any one particular way of doing this stuff."
Very good point!
David
On 1/5/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This stuff
I've read it - it says much the same as the other three videoblogging books.
And all four are worth reading - they all present info in pretty different
ways, so are useful.
David
On 1/6/07, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Heh, I just learned there was another vide
Well, not really stop motion... but take a peek at
http://davidleeking.com/etc/2007/01/stop-motion-talking.html
I'm filming me saying one word at a time, and making sentences out of it.
It's HARD!!!
Anyway - thought some of you might get a kick out of this.
--
David King
davidl
st time I saw the Macintosh 128K.
It was not the first compact computer, but it was the
first elegant compact computer.
Cheers,
David.
David Tames, Filmmaker & Media Technologist
http://kino-eye.com
You said "Why should it be teathered to one desktop computer with a
sync cable."
That one's easy - it's so Apple can sell TWO things... :-)
David
On 1/9/07, Mike Meiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ha, I'm here.
>
> I just have so much to say I don
Ditto on the H.264 and ditto on using it for a long time now. Never
heard an issue from anyone.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Michael Verdi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been using H.264 for a while now along
/byos_single_product_results.phtml?product_id=213194
should do you fine. Here is a firewire drive enclosure,
http://www.microcenter.com/byos/byos_single_product_results.phtml?product_id=241812
Hope those links work.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Congrats Bill. Good on ya!
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Streeter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey I just wanted to let you all know that I followed in Jay and
> Ryanne's footsteps and joined the Podtech Netw
Same camera as the one my wife and daughter bought for me this
Christmas. It's a very nice camera.
I added a Rode VideoMic to it to finish it all off nicely.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "dinarebecca" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wr
I found that interesting as well. Being that I am from Minnesota
myself and had absolutely no knowledge of this opportunity to become
involved. I wonder how many other MN people were told about this?
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "taulpau
I think I'll hop in on that tonight. It's been a long time since I
took part in the meeting.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Enric" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Tuesday FlashMeeting is in progress. To go t
was better to simply use blip.tv and
forget custom branding and integration and all that.
See: http://www.on2.com/developer/on2publisher/
Have fun!
David.
David Tames, Filmmaker & Media Technologist
http://kino-eye.com | 617.216.1096
*sigh*
Here we go again. They are pulling all my videos from a Blip feed.
I'm at the point where I am about to remove all my videos from
external sites and host them on my own server requiring people to
login to view them.
This sucks.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
-
re in preventing or
resolving it.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Gena" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Response from VideoRonk:
>
> "Considered usuary.
>
> Videoronk is a finder that obtains the video
Thanks Mike.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Hudack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David,
>
> We will block these guys on our end if we have to.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: videoblogg
have listed as allowed to distribute my work, the viewer is
watching unauthorized and stolen content. Also, provide an email
address in the intro informing the viewer to contact me if they think
the content could be "pirated".
How draconian...hmm?
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
Deleting all my videos from Blip and removing my own feed would stop
aggregators.
As I said earlier, I have some thinking to do about this.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Cammack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I see
; vPIP can now take all the ... links
> and make them work immediately with vPIP. The nmew script vpipit.js
> will do that. All the installation instructions for different web
> platforms include vpipit.js. With this you don't need to figure out
> how to call the vPIP function (oncli
Question for Blip: Somewhere in my blip profile I told it my itunes
URL is http://www.davidmeade.com/itunes and this is the itunes URL
that is shown on my 'show' page.
Is there some reason my show page doesn't similarly use my feed URL
(http://www.davidmeade.com/feed) that I've also specified? I
and daughter.
I would love to have the financial freedom to be able to work 8 to 5
on my videos. I dont see a sugar daddy knocking on my door in the near
future so I continue muddling along making what I can when I can.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
This should help you...
http://www.pana3ccduser.com/showthread.php?t=1695&highlight=gs150+webcam
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "heytobey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, I'm on a PC...so am I better of
Blip.tv
In my opinion, they are the best you will find.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "toekneearm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey. Is anyone using a separate server for their videos? Something
> that can handle spikes
I haven't really played with it yet (though I have the HD1A). I have editing
once in Quicktime Pro, I think (but it was just a short clip).
David
On 2/10/07, Halcyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Anyone have a Xacti HD? I have edited short HD clips using iMovie. But I
>
That's pretty cool - new media being watched on new mobile tech! It's the
revolution in progress...
david
On 2/15/07, Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, this is very cool.
>
> I just watched Rocketboom, from February 7th, on my Nokia N95 via the
>
I'm chiming in a little late on this, but all the mics sound like there's a
bad connection/cable. My guess is if you get a new cable, you'll have a
better sound.
Hope so anyway - I haven't tested the external mic thing on my Xacti yet!
David
On 2/15/07, Halcyon <[
I've been looking for inspiration to get my lazzy butt back to
vlogging ... I can think of no better reason than to take advantage of
the opportunity to put a question to The Batman Geek I will
dream up some worthy question and upload a video this weekend.
On 2/16/07, Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED
This is my personal preference for video file formats. I am by far not
an expert, master or authority on this though.
For the best quality and size, I prefer h.264 encoded .mov files.
For the best distribution, probably Flash format.
I use Final Cut Express HD to do all my editing.
David
http
videoblog, vlog, vodcast, v-blog, videocast, video podcast, podcast... any
others? They tend to be called MANY things!
David
On 2/20/07, Steve Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I remain fascinated by the possibilities of the opposite - a blog in a
> video. A really sophisti
I don't worry about the "shows" - if I'm still having fun, then it still
matters to me. And I'm only DOING it for me in the first place, so...
david
On 2/20/07, Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's it, that is the question 'does personal
Personal videos have recently become more important to myself.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's it, that is the question 'does personal vlogging matter
> anymore?'
That would be 2 trips to NY state in less than a year for me. I think
I'll fly there for this though.
If it's a sure deal, then I am definitely going to be there this year.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Charles Hope" <[
I'll trade ya. A glass of red wine for me and a beer for you.
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "Heath" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well then good I can buy you a beer...that is if you can still drink
>
1 - 100 of 1499 matches
Mail list logo