On 3/24/06, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree. Blip has generally always been on the ball with resolving
issues there. I wasnt sure if it was my connection or not? After a
couple more tests, I am now pretty sure it's not me.
To be honest, I didnt even know there was a Blip
Hey guys,
We're now using Flash as a default playback mechanism on blip.tv
itself. This is so that our users -- your users -- who don't have the
latest Quicktime or Windows Media installed can still watch the video.
We are NOT sending the Flash format through as a preferred format in
the RSS,
Thanks GuysThere is a step in the right direction, now blip is even more accessible to the passing viewer and some of us who still can't view some of the videos on the site, even though I have downloaded plug in after plug in. There is so much of Randolfe Wickers' work that I couldn't see
Agreed.Nice job on the implementation of flash.sullOn 3/14/06, mikehudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,We're now using Flash as a default playback mechanism on
blip.tvitself.This is so that our users -- your users -- who don't have thelatest Quicktime or Windows Media installed can still
Mike,A couple of questions about the flash cross posting:1) Will the flash video be embedded such that when users click it, it will play in the page (rather than pop-up window)?2) Will the users still see the screen shot that we upload on my blog page, or will they see the first frame of the
This is great, Mike, but my .flv video on blip is only taking up 1/3 of the 'screen'. It is playing in the top left corner with 2/3 of the 'screen' blank.Is this normal?ronOn Mar 14, 2006, at 10:00 AM, mikehudack wrote: Hey guys, We're now using Flash as a default playback mechanism on blip.tv
What about the media permalink? On my blip blog page it points to the MOV but on the file detail page it points to the flv.I'd personally prefer the link to point to my MOV (I've been toying around with more and more quicktime interactivity features and want to drive the use/distribution of the
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is Blip choking on itself again or is it just me? Tried to upload a
video 3 times now and it keeps timing out.
Anyone else having any problems with Blip?
I just tried uploading a video and had no problems. If
Hey Charles,
Thanks for the reply. I guess it was a glitch in the matrix. Uploading
and all seems fine now.
Thanks
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Charles Hope
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Howell
According to all our diagnostic systems and reports, we were up last
night, and haven't had downtime in some time. It looks like there
were Internet networking issues that may have caused blip to be
unavailable for some people for some period of time.
The best example of this is blip working for
I hate it when that happens, too! I'll get out there and try to find
Chicago...
:-) Looks like this was indeed a networking issue outside our
control. But, as I said in my reply to Josh, we're looking into it.
Yours,
Mike
Co-founder, blip.tv
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David
Hey David,
We can suppport quite a few concurrent viewers for a 20mb viewer :)
Our infrastructure includes two collocation facilities in New York
City (we'll soon be adding a third in California) with excellent,
burstable bandwidth. In terms of servers, we have about a dozen of
them, including
Ya...I went and flicked that light switch in my living room on again
before I went to bed last night. *poof* Chicago reappeared.
I guess I will have to put a piece of tape over that switch now to
make sure I dont do that again.
David
http://www.taoofdavid.com
--- In
works for me
Josh Leo wrote:
sorry... so is blip down for a logical reason or what?
On 2/9/06, Josh
Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--
Josh Leo
joshleo.com
stonefarm.blogspot.com
joshspicks.blogspot.com
vlogcats.blogspot.com
wearethemedia.com
Blip is down for me.
David
http://www.taoofdavid.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry... so is blip down for a logical reason or what?
On 2/9/06, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Josh Leo
joshleo.com
stonefarm.blogspot.com
i can see a post randy wicker put up just a few minutes ago
maybe it's a network issue
David Howell wrote:
Blip is down for me.
David
http://www.taoofdavid.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Josh Leo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry... so is blip down for a logical
Chicago has disappeared...
Tracing route to blip.tv [63.251.19.122]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 2741 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.2.1
217 ms14 ms13 ms 10.18.0.1
319 ms18 ms16 ms 12-215-15-65.client.mchsi.com
[12.215.15.65]
420 ms14 ms15 ms
i hate when that happens
On Feb 10, 2006, at 12:23 AM, David Howell wrote:
Chicago has disappeared...
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I might have flicked off that light switch in my living room earlier
this evening.
I *knew* it did something.
David
http://www.taoofdavid.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i hate when that happens
On Feb 10, 2006, at 12:23 AM, David
Does anyone have technical information on Blip? What kind of
bandwidth do they have? How many concurrent users can the support to
view a 20mb video? The service they are offering is amazing. But it
might also cost a pretty penny to provide. I'd like to know what
their infrastructure is?
Does anyone have technical information on Blip? What kind of
bandwidth do they have? How many concurrent users can the support to
view a 20mb video? The service they are offering is amazing. But it
might also cost a pretty penny to provide. I'd like to know what
their infrastructure is?
Hey guys,
Yes, we do allow people to upload video from cell phones.
Both companies have trademarks pending. We're going to work on it,
and that's about the best I can say right now.
Yours,
Mike
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it enough
worse case, change your name to BlipBlip.TV On 1/18/06, mikehudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,Yes, we do allow people to upload video from cell phones.Both companies have trademarks pending.We're going to work on it,and that's about the best I can say right now.Yours,
Mike--- In
or ala the millions of Ray's Pizzas here in NYC:
The original Blip.tv or the famous blip.tv.
Monika
http://nurse2be.blogspot.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
worse case, change your name to BlipBlip.TV
On 1/18/06, mikehudack [EMAIL
or ala the millions of Ray's Pizzas here in NYC:
The original Blip.tv or the famous blip.tv.
famous original Blip.tv
:-)
-Josh
On 1/18/06, monika_lyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or ala the millions of Ray's Pizzas here in NYC:
The original Blip.tv or the famous blip.tv.
Monika
I know and like one of the principals of blip.tv, and I have no idea who these
bliptv.com
folks are, but nowhere in this thread does it explain why people have said or
agreed with
the characterization of bliptv.com as a whore or of its principals as
gigolos.
Can you folks please justify
Deliberately taking on a popular brand name within an industry that
you want to breka into, and then using it for the purposes of
confusing customers into believing that you're the more popular and
reputable company is generally considered whore-worthy.
That was explained in about the second post
i dont know either.i think bliptv.com site is kick ass.blip.tv will eventually have pay services they are a business afterall. the differences will blur somewhat.
whatever.sullOn 1/17/06, Mike Lanza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know and like one of the principals of blip.tv, and I have no
what are the dates of name use and registrations and trademark applications for both?On 1/17/06, Stephanie Bryant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Deliberately taking on a popular brand name within an industry that
you want to breka into, and then using it for the purposes ofconfusing customers into
http://web.archive.org/web/20020924094457/http://bliptv.com/2002On 1/17/06,
Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what are the dates of name use and registrations and trademark applications for both?On 1/17/06, Stephanie Bryant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Deliberately taking on a popular
Well we don't know that they chose their name *after* our beloved
blip.tv did ... we found them much later, but who knows how long they
have been calling themselves that?
services that send video out to cell phones isn't evil, nor is having
a name similar to something else ... (it may be wrong,
unless blip.tv has been doing there thing for 4 years, it appears that bliptv.com has been using the name to some extent related to video since then... the contact people are the same today as they were in 2002... the earliest version of the site i could find.
sullOn 1/17/06, David Meade [EMAIL
Hey guys,
First of all, let me say that we're aware of bliptv.com. I don't
think I should say very much about the issue at the moment, but we're
doing what we can (in regular consultation with our lawyers) to deal
with the situation.
I don't think anyone was out to hurt anyone or otherwise do
Hmmm, well I guess it will remain a mystery to me. I'm using Fedora
Core 4/Linux and haven't figured out how to install the Flash plug-in
which is at the front door of this site.
I have questions about the name, has our Blip.tv been trademarked
protected? Has it been established longer that the
Is it enough separation that one company targets mobile users
and the other is for desktop citizens?
Blip.tv also supports mobile uploads. I wouldn't say its only for
desktop citizens.
-Josh
On 1/17/06, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, well I guess it will remain a mystery to me. I'm
They don't want films made to entertain children... I guess that
leaves me out... heh
Susan
http://vlog.kitykity.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Share [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saw this today on Craigslist
Blip wants short films
The future is right now!
Cheers Blip.
I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we
all know and love for hosting.
Are they related?
On 1/16/06, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They don't want films made to entertain children... I guess that
leaves me out... heh
Susan
http://vlog.kitykity.com
--- In
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we
all know and love for hosting.
They're not. There's the Blip we love and then there's the blip whore who
has a pact with sprint.
- Andreas
--
URL:
http://bliptv.com/On 1/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we all know and love for hosting.They're not. There's the Blip we love and then
lol ... something tells me you're not a fan of sprint? :-P
On 1/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we
all know and love for hosting.
OMG! thanks for the clarification on that Andreas.
Had no idea there was an evil blip.
cheers.
s.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought I heard that this
I've never had to endure Sprint, but I'm not a fan of companies stealing
the name of other companies. It creates confusion and the blip.tv guys
don't need that.
- Andreas
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:53:07 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
lol ... something tells me you're not a fan
I seriously hope blip.tv has a trademark registration-- the name
similarity IS causing customer confusion, which is exactly what
trademark exists to prevent.
This Blip whore needs to go!
--Stephanie
On 1/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100,
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:26:23 +0100, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I seriously hope blip.tv has a trademark registration-- the name
similarity IS causing customer confusion, which is exactly what
trademark exists to prevent.
I'm certain the blip.tv guys are all over it. However
i thought we agreed way back when back to try and refer to them as
gigolos ;)
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we
all know and love for hosting.
Not that I know, David...
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, taoofdavid65 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
O crap. Did Blip just take another nose dive?
David
http://www.taoofdavid.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, mikehudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
Yes, blip was
Very sorry about that. Should be stable again now.
Yours,
Mike
Co-founder, blip.tv
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
confirmed - it was unavailable again for a short time when david's
second message appeared, then came back pretty soon afterwards
Hey guys,
Yes, blip was down for a little bit today. Everything has been back
up and running for some time now, and we expect it to stay that way :)
The cause of the failure, for the geeks in the house, was the failure
of the RAID controller in one of our primary production servers. We
O crap. Did Blip just take another nose dive?
David
http://www.taoofdavid.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, mikehudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,
Yes, blip was down for a little bit today. Everything has been back
up and running for some time now, and we expect it to stay
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jakob and Schlomo get quoted too...
http://tinyurl.com/77ce9
cheers
r
--
URL: http://r.24x7.com
Deconstructing the status quo, collaboratively
Here's the permalink to the ClipShack film, Capt Jack the
That damn one-eyed dog got more space in the article than I did!!
:)
As an online article, I thought it was kinda strange that they didn't link to
any of us
content makers-- just hosting services. And even then, it was kind of slapshod
in where
the hotlinks are located. They have that
101 - 151 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
