Joan Khoo wrote:
>
> Personally, I would do what I want regardless of the audience.
I hope this idea sticks around videoblogging for a long time. :)
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Get fast
On 11/28/05, Joan Khoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sounds like a "do we give the audience what they want or do we do what we want" dilemma.
This usually depends largely on whether the audience has money.
Ronen
cinemalog.net
On 11/27/05, Randolfe Wicker <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:>> I'm w
Sounds like a "do we give the audience what they want or do we do what we want" dilemma.
Personally, I would do what I want regardless of the audience. I
believe its all in how you present it. If you consistently deliver
interesting topics, the audience have no choice but to "follow" you.
Ther
You can do whatever you like, that's one of the great things about
vidoeblogging.
Of course, if you want to reach a larger audience, you might want to
create content with regards to that particular audience in mind.
Also, don't get too hung up on stats. The longer you produce content,
the more att
ivistAdvisor: The Immortality
InstituteHoboken, NJhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280
- Original Message -
From:
Susan
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 4:05
PM
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: great post
of p
No wait... I've got it... you know LJdrama.com ? We need
vlogdrama.com ... is it available?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "LeanBackVids.com"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I find this hilarious too. Isn't this just the result of defending
> existing and potential personal celebrity statu
Josh, I'd have to say that this is the best post so far in this
thread. That's quite a head you have on your shoulders; we could all
learn from it. ;)
Susan
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Oy, this whole conversation is like an exercise in no
Sorry that you got such a bad rap... I thought the post was great.
And you smiled through the whole thing. :)
Susan
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "gabe_perardua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I have to say that this is a much nicer thread than what is happening
> on my vlog at the moem
Hey! He said cheerleading. I vlog cheerleading.
http://www.kitykity.com/weblog.php/vlog/comments/2774/
Ok folks, now here's my two cents--my own, personal, two pennies.
I get bored by themed content. I do. I watch Rocketboom, but not
every day, even though it's in my FireANT--but I see that
> No, I was talking about Josh. He is a unique individual and I think
> he has one of the most spirited uses of a videoblog I have seen. When
> I look around at videobloggers, I do not see sameness. I see people.
Do you see dead people?
;)
Susan
http://vlog.kitykity.com
Excellent! Thanks for posting this. I haven't watched any of his
stuff since he interviewed Josh K... now I remember that I need to get
his feed in my ant :)
Susan
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "jonny goldstein"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Cops illegally frisk a Gabe, a vlogger an
Given our medium and passions, it's a shame that -- if we at least
can't get rid of flame-wars-esque discussions -- we can't at least put
them in our chosen medium, to make them interesting and perhaps get
people involved and active (ie: content creators) by inspiring
reactions. (ie, this is a
I have to say that this is a much nicer thread than what is happening
on my vlog at the moemnt with the comments. I've just spent the last 2
hours removing hate comments about this posting. I tried to leave as
many comments that actually were about the event rather than blatant
hate comments. I've
Defensiveness is what its all about, what makes it hard to discuss
these sorts of issues without people falling out.
Some 'personal' videobloggers are on the defensive because of how the
big media voices have dismissed them. They put time and love into what
they do, it seems valid to them, and it
I find this hilarious too. Isn't this just the result of defending
existing and potential personal celebrity status?
We may need to start our very own gossip magazine or celebrity death
match. HA!
-Matt
---
http://ridertech.com
http://leanbackvids.com
http://vlogmap.org
To take this in a slightly different direction, I thought
Gabe's video was great. I would hope, at least in the USA, that if one
put this video of police misconduct on one's videoblog, no matter what
the overarching theme of most of the posts on that blog, that this
post would be considered news,
Ah, the themed vs. personal debate again. This is the most
entertaining one so far.
On a somewhat related note, the December issue of Wired asks - "What's
the most overhyped tech trend right now?"...
Robert X. Cringely (Creator and host of NerdTV) answers...
"There's nothing wrong with blogging
I'd just like to butt in for a second and say that snooping in on this thread
has been a strange experience. AMB--hostile, much?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Verdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 19, 2005, at 12:12 PM, andrew michael baron wrote:
>
> > Is this videoblogging lis
Having strayed pretty far off this topic, I did want to say Josh,
that I don't in any way mean to devalue self-fufillment - self
fufillment is something that I hope all of here have as a component
of what we are doing with all of this.
On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:52 AM, andrew michael baron wrot
On Nov 19, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Steve Watkins wrote:
> I think you are making an err if you think the overall intent of all
> of a persons works are the main key to whether they can invoke a 'fair
> use' defense for anything that might otherwise be questionable.
>
I dont think its the main key. Bu
I think you are making an err if you think the overall intent of all
of a persons works are the main key to whether they can invoke a 'fair
use' defense for anything that might otherwise be questionable.
If the law is even half-sane then it will come down to stuff like
intent with that particular
Regarding US law I think this site sums things up very well:
http://fairuse.stanford.edu/Copyright_and_Fair_Use_Overview/chapter12/index.html
Intent is important, I think its actually 'free speech' (rather than
fair use) things in your constitution which make this stuff
acceptable, but it should
22 matches
Mail list logo
