@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 2:33
PM
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: the
continuing frustration
Try this:http://www.youtube.com/terms.phpIts
probably the following stuff from section 5 that Randolfe wasrefring to.
Its enough to put me off, obviously they have
Try this:
http://www.youtube.com/terms.php
Its probably the following stuff from section 5 that Randolfe was
refring to. Its enough to put me off, obviously they have to be given
the rights to distribute the work or they couldnt function, but
perpetual and sublicensable and transferable, hmm
For comparison, Ourmedia and Blip just follow the terms of the
license you attach to your work. They don't claim any additional
rights.
Verdi
--
Me: http://michaelverdi.com
RD: http://graymattergravy.com
Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org
Learn to videoblog in person:
We use Quicktime with single-pass 3ivx... It works for people who
have QT 6 or higher and Bre showed us our videos on his video iPod.
Our latest (theme-based) vlog has more viewers that are non-vloggers
than vloggers and none of them have ever complained about our format.
I too was confused why
The biggest problem with ANY video is that there is no consistancy.
There are multiple file formats (wmv, avi, mpg, mov, etc) and multiple
CODECS within each of those file formats (mp4, 3ivx, xvid, divx,
etc)... and NONE of them have become common.
Audio is pretty firmly entrenched in MP3s,
Greetings,
I dont thnik you are a thorn in anybodies side, the reasons for a lack
of response to specific posts are varied. I frequently get paranoid
that Im being ignored and am wasting my time, or that I am annoying
everyone excessively. Theres likely some truth to it, but Im easily
reassured.
There wass a fuss because:
We knew the paper spec before anybody actually had one of the devices
to test and be sure.
Theres plenty of ways to make video that doesnt work
H264 as well as mpeg 4 adds a extra layer of potential confusion and
choice about what format gives the best results
Apple
Hope this isn't too far off the topic of the thread.. but there is
indeed a forum over at vlogdir.com. I, for one, think it would be
really cool to use that as a means of communication as well.
Organizing messages into different topics makes it easier to find an
answer to a question you may have,
I agree with you mostly, and even if the codec issue was sorted there
are always isues like resolution and different framerates, issues that
wont get any simpler as HD stuff becomes more common with video from
TV, DVD and internet.
On the other hand I remain optimistic about mpeg4's chances of
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 12:28
PM
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: the
continuing frustration
The biggest problem with ANY video is that there is no
consistancy. There are multiple file formats (wmv, avi, mpg, mov,
etc) and multiple CODECS
Id be happy to look at any of
your examples of videos that arentworking right for some people, in whatever
format, to see if I cananswer the specific problems in your case. Personally
if I was makinga site that should be easily accessible to all, id use flash
video forpeople using
, November 21, 2005 12:52
PM
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: the
continuing frustration
Hope this isn't too far off the topic of the thread.. but
there isindeed a forum over at vlogdir.com. I, for one, think it would
bereally cool to use that as a means of communication as
well.Organizing
I'm not a big fan of the new Google Reader, but I think it is
important to offer a 1-click subscribe button for it since Google is
beloved by most Internet users. It is my assumption that average
users are more likely to relate to a Google link than a Bloglines or
Yahoo. Personally, I offer
Hi Bev,
I would like to say a bunch of stuff but I'm in a computer lab
waiting for my class to start.
There are times when it does get a little thick around here. Certain
discussions I actually stay out of because I sense the topic isn't
about vlogging per say but chest beating. Since I have
14 matches
Mail list logo
