Hello,
I am currently out of the office until August 4th, 2010. If you need
immediate assistance contact InJoy at (303) 447-2082 ext 2.
Otherwise, I will reply to your message as soon as I return.
Thank you,
Normal
0
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
Microsof
http://www.copyright.gov/1201/
--
Chris Lewis
Media Librarian
American University Library
202.885.3257
Please think twice before printing this e-mail.
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
relating to the selection, evaluation, acquisition,bibliographic co
I will be on vacation as of July 26 and returning August 16. Interlibrary loan
services will not be available during this time. If you need immediate
assistance, please call 416-675-6622 ext. 4421
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
relating to the select
Very sensible. It allows you circumvent the DMCA in order to use a small
portion of a work for a class etc. I especially appreciate that it really
spells out this is a small portion and for a "transformative" purpose.
Jessica
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Chris Lewis wrote:
> http://www.c
Okay, pardon me if I missed this issue being dealt with earlier this
summer. I have been out of town a lot and have not followed up on some
threads.
I am looking for an FAQ for the DMCA and TEACH act for higher ed
faculty. You know, where they think they can grab a DVD off the shelf
and have it b
I think the Exceptions for Instructors eTool that I created with the
help/support of the Copyright Subcommittee of ALA's Office for Information
Technology Policy is a good place to start.
http://librarycopyright.net/etool/
I'd love to hear what you think of it and if you end up using it at your
Incredible! We won!
Three cheers for Carleton Jackson and his crew on the East Coast, Carrie
Russell and the ALA Washington Office, and me and my posse out
here...restores at least a bit of my faith in process.
gary
Gary Handman
Director
Media Resources Center
Moffitt Library
UC Berkeley
510-
The new rules allow circumvention for the "incorporation of short portions of
motion pictures into new works for the purpose of criticism or comment" in
three instances:
(i) Educational uses by college and university professors and by college and
university film and media studies students; [
Congratulations! This is such good news!
SMc
Sarah E. McCleskey
Head of Access Services
Acting Director, Film and Media Library
112 Axinn Library
Hofstra University
Hempstead, NY 11549-1230
sarah.e.mccles...@hofstra.edu
516-463-5076 (o)
516-463-4309 (f)
-Original Message-
From: videol
As you've commented, Linda, there are really TWO discreet issues at hand:
1. Breaking of circumvention for the purpose of extracting clips--covered
by the DMCA and now a lot more liberal than previously
2. Fair use--under which issues such as quantity, length, nature of use,
etc. fall.
The rec
ooops...that's discrete (not discreet--a word that I've been told isn't in
my vocabulary)
> As you've commented, Linda, there are really TWO discreet issues at hand:
>
> 1. Breaking of circumvention for the purpose of extracting clips--covered
> by the DMCA and now a lot more liberal than previo
I think it is kind of obvious. If you needed to actually license the
material then the rights holder would presumably have granted you permission
to circumvent the DMCA or provided material directly. I believe the whole
point of this was to allow "fair use" to apply because the DMCA made only
the o
I notice also that the restriction on the ownership of the DVDs in question has
gone away, which is marvelous.
Doesn't the wording imply that the exception is for circumventing access
controls precisely in cases where fair use would normally apply? I.e., "short
clips" of the sort one could use
Damn. You beat me to it. I was composing a pithy response but I will
stand down...
:)
Christine Crowley
Dean of Learning Resources
Northwest Vista College
3535 N. Ellison Dr.
San Antonio, TX 78251
210.486.4572 voice
210.486.4504 fax
NEW NAME AND email--ccrowl...@alamo.edu
-Original Message--
Actually Gary I disagree. I think this rule reaffirms the terms of what
"Fair Use" is considering you have a least one major institution and more
than a few academics claiming it actually can cover an ENTIRE feature work.
Here is the wording in the new rule (or whatever we call it)
"in order to ac
yeah...I think the implicit understanding is that the ability to
circumvent for the purposes of exercising fair use rights to extract for
certain purposes (such as teaching) is what this whole shebang is about in
the first place.
gary
> I notice also that the restriction on the ownership of the
Could it not be interpreted that a student in another discipline making a video
for a class project will also have this protection under the second and third
sections? Students could argue that a class project in history or some other
field of study creating a video is either a documentary film
This ruling has NOTHING directly to do with the nature, interpretation, or
application of fair use.
Gary
> Actually Gary I disagree. I think this rule reaffirms the terms of what
> "Fair Use" is considering you have a least one major institution and more
> than a few academics claiming it actual
Well, I think the one area in which we didn't gain as much ground as we
would have liked is the application of exemptions to students. These
revisions at least give a nod to student need to circumvent for academic
uses, even though the exemption is limited to film studies students
(really and trul
I'll second that!
Michael Brewer
Team Leader for Instructional Services
University of Arizona Libraries
brew...@u.library.arizona.edu
-Original Message-
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of
ghand...@library.berkeley.edu
Sen
No I read it that way too again provided it follows the standard short
portion from a legal copy rule.
Jessica
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:18 PM, John Streepy wrote:
> Could it not be interpreted that a student in another discipline making a
> video for a class project will also have this protec
OK, I read the sections in the Registrar of Copyright's Recommendations (found
at the original link http://www.copyright.gov/1201/) that relate to this topic.
Pages 35-43 explain why they are purposely not including language about
infringing and noninfringing uses of the content in documentary
I hope Chris Lewis will forward these clear guidelines to his colleagues
Pat Aufderheide of the Center for Social Media at American University
and Peter Jazy of the American University Law School. It may help them
clarify their position on whether every educational use of copyrighted
material, in
Someone just asked me, and I realized I did not have the answer -- does this
Rule-making by the Librarian of Congress carry the weight of law? is it a
binding step, or a step on the path to a binding interpretation?
VIDEOLIB is intended to encourage the broad and lively discussion of issues
relati
The LOC is vested with making binding rulings re copyright. This
particular ruling does not need to be ratified by Congress.
Gary
> Someone just asked me, and I realized I did not have the answer -- does
> this
> Rule-making by the Librarian of Congress carry the weight of law? is it a
> bindi
Thanks Gary!
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:24 PM, wrote:
> The LOC is vested with making binding rulings re copyright. This
> particular ruling does not need to be ratified by Congress.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> > Someone just asked me, and I realized I did not have the answer -- does
> > this
> > Rule-maki
It clearly states that in order to be entitled to break encryption the use
MUST be for a SMALL portion used for criticism or comment which if nothing
else totally negates any claim that one can stream an encrypted film ( and
most DVDs have some kind of encryption) and justify it by "fair use". We
I think Gary is being a little disingenuous to say that today's ruling
has absolutely nothing to do with fair use. One need merely read UCLA's
legal brief to see that they are making a fair use claim for breaking
encryption not to use clips to "critique or comment" but to stream
entire works.
W
Just passing this on...
Dylan Maddox McGinty
Sales Officer
Accessibility and Digital Enterprises
National Film Board of Canada/U.S. Office
927 Stanford Street
Santa Monica, CA 90403
Tel 310 453 1389
Fax 310 453 4764
Mob 347 873 5160
- Original Message -
From: H-NET List for Scholarly S
This is actually funny & ironic.since Ms. Aufderheide is a leading
proponent of the claim that ENTIRE works are "fair use".I wonder if she
noticed the part about SMALL PORTIONS for use in critique & criticism.
Jessica
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 10:26 PM, McGinty Dylan wrote:
> Just passing this o
30 matches
Mail list logo
