[Videolib] [SPAM] Re: First reports of beta testing of Hoopla, streaming media service

2013-05-01 Thread John Streepy
I read the article and saw that people not in the beta tester group can give it a try. So I click on the Trial library, and it fills in the data and lists my Library Card Number as 'Not needed for demo', so then when I click register, it denies me access saying that Library card 'Not needed for de

Re: [Videolib] Is Streaming transformative?

2013-05-01 Thread Moshiri, Farhad
Thank you Jessica, Judith and others who responded to my email. I was thinking did I get everything wrong for the past few years studying copyright issues? You've cleared for me that I have not yet lost my mind! Farhad From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.be

Re: [Videolib] Is Streaming transformative?

2013-05-01 Thread Jessica Rosner
This person is so breathtakingly wrong it is hard to know where to start. Judith responded to some of it, but lets for a moment totally ignore the totally wrong assertions on copyright and go to the unbelievable claim that "Federal Law trumps contract law" WTF?? Really you mean that contract Paypal

Re: [Videolib] First reports of beta testing of Hoopla, streaming media service

2013-05-01 Thread Rosen, Rhonda
If only they would move into the academic market. From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Deg Farrelly Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 9:48 PM To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu Subject: [Videolib] First reports of beta testing of Hoopla,

Re: [Videolib] Is Streaming transformative?

2013-05-01 Thread Shoaf,Judith P
The UCLA case was dismissed, twice. Until some valid plaintiff names a valid defendant (as for example in the Georgia State case, which involved books scanned and put on line), there will be no proper decision about fair use in the case or opportunity to appeal that decision. The second time A.

[Videolib] Is Streaming transformative?

2013-05-01 Thread Moshiri, Farhad
Dear Colleagues, Yesterday, I attended a webinar on recent copyright court cases in which the presenter stated several points that confused me a lot since they were completely the opposite of what I've learned up to this day. I need your help to clarify these issues. 1. The presenter st