Re: MO

2005-03-01 Thread Lex Eisenhardt
Why don't we all leave this list? Seriously, I really can do without this nonsense. I'm thinking of folding it completely. I guess you are not in the position to do that? It's our list. I don't want to be responsible for creating more space in the cyberworld where we can flex our

RE: MO

2005-02-28 Thread Rob MacKillop
, and at that time I said I don't think he is. So Matanya made some valuable contributions. Eventually RT did join up, and the inevitable clash came. MO just can't be bothered with the confrontation, and decided to leave. I can see now, from my earlier posting, that it looks like I kicked him off

Re: MO

2005-02-28 Thread Stephan Olbertz
did join up, and the inevitable clash came. MO just can't be bothered with the confrontation, and decided to leave. I can see now, from my earlier posting, that it looks like I kicked him off the list. Nothing could be further from the truth, and this list remains unmoderated. Roman, you

RE: MO

2005-02-28 Thread Rob MacKillop
No problem! I think I was not very clear in my first post. I was a bit depressed about it all. Cheers, Rob -Original Message- From: Stephan Olbertz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 28 February 2005 19:05 To: vihuela@cs.dartmouth.edu; Rob MacKillop Subject: Re: MO Dear Rob, I

Re: MO

2005-02-28 Thread Antonio Corona
Dear all, I donĀ“t know how such a situation may have arised, but one fact is perfectly clear to me: in a list devoted to communicate and share, either all of us - even those we disagree with - have a place, or there is no point in pursuing what may become a futile exercice. I have often read