Re: exists() result sometimes misleading for a command

2016-09-15 Thread Kazunobu Kuriyama
2016-09-15 7:41 GMT+09:00 Tony Mechelynck : > exists() result is sometimes misleading for a command. > > Example (with GTK3 gvim linked with GTK 3.16.7): > :echo exists(':tearoff') > 2 > :tearoff &Help > E319: Sorry, the command is not available in this version > > So for e

Re: exists() result sometimes misleading for a command

2016-09-15 Thread Tony Mechelynck
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > 2016-09-15 7:41 GMT+09:00 Tony Mechelynck : >> >> exists() result is sometimes misleading for a command. >> >> Example (with GTK3 gvim linked with GTK 3.16.7): >> :echo exists(':tearoff') >> 2 >> :tearoff &Help >>

Re: exists() result sometimes misleading for a command

2016-09-15 Thread Kazunobu Kuriyama
2016-09-15 17:46 GMT+09:00 Tony Mechelynck : > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Kazunobu Kuriyama > wrote: > > 2016-09-15 7:41 GMT+09:00 Tony Mechelynck > : > >> > >> exists() result is sometimes misleading for a command. > >> > >> Example (with GTK3 gvim linked with GTK 3.16.7): > >> :echo

Patch 8.0.0005

2016-09-15 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Patch 8.0.0005 Problem:Netbeans test fails with Python 3. (Jonathonf) Solution: Encode the string before sending it. (closes #1070) Files: src/testdir/test_netbeans.py *** ../vim-8.0.0004/src/testdir/test_netbeans.py2016-09-09 15:27:58.0 +0200 --- src/testdir/test_net

Re: exists() result sometimes misleading for a command

2016-09-15 Thread Tony Mechelynck
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > 2016-09-15 17:46 GMT+09:00 Tony Mechelynck : >> >> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Kazunobu Kuriyama >> wrote: >> > 2016-09-15 7:41 GMT+09:00 Tony Mechelynck >> > : >> >> >> >> exists() result is sometimes misleading for a command. >>

Gtk3 warning on stderr

2016-09-15 Thread Matěj Cepl
I have built vim 8.0.003 on RHEL-7 with Gtk3 (gtk3-3.14.13-20.el7.x86_64) and everything works nice (thank you!) except I get plenty of warnings on stderr: (gvim:10610): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkNotebook 0x28001e0 is mapped but visible child GtkEventBox 0x2802150 is not mapped According to my colleag

Re: exists() result sometimes misleading for a command

2016-09-15 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Tony Mechelynck wrote: > exists() result is sometimes misleading for a command. > > Example (with GTK3 gvim linked with GTK 3.16.7): > :echo exists(':tearoff') > 2 > :tearoff &Help > E319: Sorry, the command is not available in this version > > So for example the followi

Re: Gtk3 warning on stderr

2016-09-15 Thread Kazunobu Kuriyama
2016-09-15 19:04 GMT+09:00 Matěj Cepl : > I have built vim 8.0.003 on RHEL-7 with Gtk3 > (gtk3-3.14.13-20.el7.x86_64) and everything works nice (thank > you!) except I get plenty of warnings on stderr: > > (gvim:10610): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkNotebook 0x28001e0 is mapped > but visible child GtkEventBo

Re: gvim and ASCII glyphs

2016-09-15 Thread manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev
On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 20:38:27 UTC+1, Christian Brabandt wrote: > Hi, > > On Mi, 14 Sep 2016, manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev wrote: > > > > > let g:gtk_nocache=[0x, 0xfc00, 0xf801, 0x7801] > > > > This contains a bitmap for each character < 128, which has the >

Re: gx doesn't work anymore with vim 8.0.4

2016-09-15 Thread Charles E Campbell
Cesar Romani wrote: > I'm using vim 8.0.4 on Windows 7 compiled with MinGW. > When doing gx on an url I get: > > E117: Unknown function: netrw#CheckIfRemote > E116: Invalid arguments for function netrw#BrowseX > > Many thanks in advance, netrw#CheckIfRemote is in v156 which is distributed with vim

Re: gvim and ASCII glyphs

2016-09-15 Thread Kazunobu Kuriyama
Hi Manuel, 2016-09-15 21:33 GMT+09:00 manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev < vim_dev@googlegroups.com>: > On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 20:38:27 UTC+1, Christian Brabandt wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mi, 14 Sep 2016, manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev wrote: > > > > > > > > let g:gtk_nocache=[0x0

Re: gvim and ASCII glyphs

2016-09-15 Thread manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev
Hi Kazunobu, On Thursday, 15 September 2016 14:33:48 UTC+1, Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > Hi Manuel, > > 2016-09-15 21:33 GMT+09:00 manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev > : > > > > > On Wednesday, 14 September 2016 20:38:27 UTC+1, Christian Brabandt  wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Mi, 14 Sep

Re: gvim and ASCII glyphs

2016-09-15 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2016-09-15, 12:33 GMT, manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev wrote: > Hi Matěj, Christian, > > I've added the value which is equivalent to the previous patch, i.e. > > " this should keep character 0-31 (control characters), and > " [0-9A-Za-z] flowing through the glyph cache, and the rest > " < 12

Re: gvim and ASCII glyphs

2016-09-15 Thread Kazunobu Kuriyama
2016-09-15 22:43 GMT+09:00 manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev < vim_dev@googlegroups.com>: > Hi Kazunobu, > > On Thursday, 15 September 2016 14:33:48 UTC+1, Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > > Hi Manuel, > > > > 2016-09-15 21:33 GMT+09:00 manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev < > vim...@googlegroups.com>: >

Re: gvim and ASCII glyphs

2016-09-15 Thread manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev
On Thursday, 15 September 2016 15:14:03 UTC+1, Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > 2016-09-15 22:43 GMT+09:00 manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev > : > > > Hi Kazunobu, > > > > On Thursday, 15 September 2016 14:33:48 UTC+1, Kazunobu Kuriyama  wrote: > > > Hi Manuel, > > > > > > > > 2016-09-15 21:3

Re: gvim and ASCII glyphs

2016-09-15 Thread manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev
On Thursday, 15 September 2016 15:01:35 UTC+1, mcepl wrote: > On 2016-09-15, 12:33 GMT, manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev wrote: > > Hi Matěj, Christian, > > > > I've added the value which is equivalent to the previous patch, i.e. > > > > " this should keep character 0-31 (control characters), and

Re: gvim and ASCII glyphs

2016-09-15 Thread Kazunobu Kuriyama
2016-09-15 23:31 GMT+09:00 manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev < vim_dev@googlegroups.com>: > On Thursday, 15 September 2016 15:14:03 UTC+1, Kazunobu Kuriyama wrote: > > 2016-09-15 22:43 GMT+09:00 manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev < > vim...@googlegroups.com>: > > > > > > Hi Kazunobu, > > > > > > >

ratpoison.vim syntax update

2016-09-15 Thread Magnus Woldrich
List, Bram, Attached is a patch, - fixing missing 'gravity' highlighting - introducing the "new" 'maxundos' setting - introducing the (in ratpoison) undocumented setting 'framefmt' which takes the same arguments as 'winfmt' Cheers -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maill

Re: gvim and ASCII glyphs

2016-09-15 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2016-09-15, 14:52 GMT, manuelschiller.pimail via vim_dev wrote: > Well, I was thinking along the lines that using these special > ligature glyphs is definitely a matter of preference. (For > example, Bram had a pretty strong opinion about ">=/<=" and > how he would not like to see ligatures f

Re: gvim and ASCII glyphs

2016-09-15 Thread Matěj Cepl
On 2016-09-15, 16:42 GMT, Matěj Cepl wrote: > That’s probably a good point: looking at issues on > https://github.com/tonsky/FiraCode/issues and > https://github.com/tonsky/FiraCode/wiki it seems there is > truly not The Right Way™ how to do it (especially, if Haskell > people get involved, who

Re: gx doesn't work anymore with vim 8.0.4

2016-09-15 Thread Cesar Romani
On 15/09/2016 08:06 a.m., Charles E Campbell wrote: > Cesar Romani wrote: >> I'm using vim 8.0.4 on Windows 7 compiled with MinGW. >> When doing gx on an url I get: >> >> E117: Unknown function: netrw#CheckIfRemote >> E116: Invalid arguments for function netrw#BrowseX >> >> Many thanks in advance,

Re: [doc][patch] Fix version8.txt

2016-09-15 Thread Darren
Another typo. On https://github.com/vim/vim/blob/master/runtime/doc/version8.txt#L162";>line 162 of version8.txt'so' should be 'to'. Thanks, Darren -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more informa

Re: gx doesn't work anymore with vim 8.0.4

2016-09-15 Thread Cesar Romani
On 15/09/2016 02:22 p.m., Cesar Romani wrote: > On 15/09/2016 08:06 a.m., Charles E Campbell wrote: > > Cesar Romani wrote: > >> I'm using vim 8.0.4 on Windows 7 compiled with MinGW. > >> When doing gx on an url I get: > >> > >> E117: Unknown function: netrw#CheckIfRemote > >> E116: Invalid