Hi,
I have noticed this bug[1] occurring on Windows 7 since version 8.0. It
looks to me that this does not happen on linux console or gui versions. I
just observed it occurring with vim and gvim on Windows 10.
Please let me know if anyone can reproduce this.
Thanks,
Brian
[1
Hey Bram,
> Patch 8.0.1194
> Problem:Actual fg and bg colors of terminal are unknown.
> Solution: Add t_RF. Store response to t_RB and t_RF, use for terminal.
> Files: src/term.c, src/term.h, src/proto/term.pro, src/terminal.c,
> src/vim.h, src/eval.c, runtime/doc/eval.txt
>Bram Moolenaar wrote:
> Can we see the start and/or end of a word by recognizing characters?
> Or do we need to recognize words?
>
> The spell checker does have some knowledge about where words start and
> end. It's a bit slow doing it that way, but might still be acceptable.
>
> I suppose we
e difference between the two examples that you give.
:) If I type '*' while sitting on a Thai word, I would expect it to go the next
matching word and not try to match the entire unspaced-phrase. 'diw' should not
delete the entire phrase, but only the Thai word that I am sitting on. etc.
Brian
> --
I posted the following question on the vi/vim stack exchange
<http://vi.stackexchange.com/questions/5452/set-line-breaks-word-wraps-and-word-searching-for-thai-and-other-non-latin-lang>
and was told that the vim-dev mailing list would be a more appropriate
place to ask.
Brian
It is edite
A few bugs with C and C++ syntax highlighting:
1. In C mode, if c_no_c11 is set, then the highlighting of u8foo depends on
c_no_cformat. If c_no_cformat is on, it gets highlighted even though u8foo is
not a valid string literal pre-C11.
2. In C++ mode, if c_no_c11 is set, then (u8foo) doesn't
cpp.vim has a lot of if statements like this:
if !exists(cpp_no_cpp11) ... endif
for C++11-only features. C++14 adds binary literals and digit separators and
I'm interested in adding these to cpp.vim. In analogy, should I just wrap them
in
if !exists(cpp_no_cpp14) ... endif
blocks?
--
--
After :silent !, vim looks blank. I have to ^L or :redraw! to make
it look normal.
Sorry if this isn't the right list; I'm sending this here because :help
bug said to.
Let me know if this isn't enough bugreport.txt.
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.3 (2010 Aug 15, compiled Dec 8 2012 16:47:21)
Included
On Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:30:42 AM UTC-4, James McCoy wrote:
On Jul 17, 2012 6:47 AM, Brian D. Burns bu...@iosctr.com wrote:
I've attached a new patch, with an updated test and Makefile which
includes tests using --remote-send and --remote-expr.
Also, I've spent some time with gdb
On 07/14/2012 06:21 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Brian Burns wrote:
I've attached a patch which includes an updated test and Makefile, with
the server being started and stopped in the Makefile. Also included is a
change to serverPeekReply() and an added note for ServerWait
On 07/07/2012 09:57 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Brian Burns wrote:
Recently, I have been looking into different methods for using Vim
to syntax highlight small blocks of code. In the process, I found
runtime/tools/xcmdsrv_client.c, which worked but seemed a little
outdated. So, after
On 07/08/2012 07:49 PM, Brian D. Burns wrote:
On 07/07/2012 09:57 AM, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Brian Burns wrote:
Recently, I have been looking into different methods for using Vim
to syntax highlight small blocks of code. In the process, I found
runtime/tools/xcmdsrv_client.c, which worked
suggests some changes to the ServerWait() function,
which speeds up response time, handles an issue where the XEvent queue
is not being checked when 'localLoop' is true, and a few other thoughts.
I appreciate your time - and Vim! :)
- Brian
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do
. It took me
several hours and a few gdb sessions to figure out how to get the
netbeans interface going, and I suspect I can save others the trouble I
went through.
--
Brian
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying
want to limit output to
actual UTF-8/Unicode. :-)
Feeling slightly pedantic,
~~ Brian Gernhardt
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
Hello,
With 7.2a now out, I didn't see any mention of support for 64-bit
Windows. Vista (whatever you feel about it) really is the gateway to
64-bit on the Windows platform. This is my plea that 7.2 supports 64-
bit Windows out of the box.
All of the work is already done. There is a site
16 matches
Mail list logo
