> Ok, it makes sense. But what about the first part of my post, before
> "But let us assume for a moment that this behaviour is correct"?
>
> There is neither buffer named '~/foobar/bar' nor '~/foobar/baz'. There
> are only 'bar' and 'baz' buffers. The results returned by either ':ls'
> or '' are
On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 6:36:28 PM UTC+2, ZyX wrote:
> > But let us assume for a moment that this behaviour is correct. Then:
>
> >
>
> > :buffer bar
>
> >
>
> > should display analogous results (because 'bar' is a substring in the
>
> > absolute path for all files). That is:
>
>
On Sep 11, 2013 8:13 PM, "Wiktor Ruben" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I use Vim 7.4.5. Let me start with some prerequisities:
>
> ~ $ mkdir foobar
> ~ $ cd foobar
> ~/foobar $ touch foo bar baz
> ~/foobar $ vim -u NONE foo bar baz
>
> Now, make the observation that:
>
> :ls
> 1 %a
Hello,
I use Vim 7.4.5. Let me start with some prerequisities:
~ $ mkdir foobar
~ $ cd foobar
~/foobar $ touch foo bar baz
~/foobar $ vim -u NONE foo bar baz
Now, make the observation that:
:ls
1 %a "foo" line 1
2 "bar"
