Hi Tony!
On Do, 24 Jan 2013, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> What do you mean, "the Swiss may think otherwise"? IIUC, in the
> de_CH standard the eszett is not used, it is always replaced by ss,
> because the Swiss have no room for it on their trilingual (well,
> quadrilingual, even) typewriter keyboard
On 23/01/13 22:08, Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Dominique!
On Mo, 21 Jan 2013, Dominique Pellé wrote:
You obviously speak better German than me, but isn't the German
ess-zett equivalent to ss rather than sz? I'm curious why /sz.
You got me ;)
Of course esszett is, despite its name, equivale
Hi Joachim!
On Do, 24 Jan 2013, Joachim Schmitz wrote:
> But still, while ß is equivalent to ss, the oposite is not true,
> only few ss are equivalent to ß.
> Same for ä,ö,ü and ae, oe, ue, equivalent in one direction but not
> the other.
Indeed, but when we are talking about equivalence classes
Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Dominique!
On Mo, 21 Jan 2013, Dominique Pellé wrote:
You obviously speak better German than me, but isn't the German
ess-zett equivalent to ss rather than sz? I'm curious why /sz.
You got me ;)
Of course esszett is, despite its name, equivalent to ss and that i
Hi Dominique!
On Mo, 21 Jan 2013, Dominique Pellé wrote:
> You obviously speak better German than me, but isn't the German
> ess-zett equivalent to ss rather than sz? I'm curious why /sz.
You got me ;)
Of course esszett is, despite its name, equivalent to ss and that is
what the standard actua
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Hi Dominique!
>
> On Mi, 16 Jan 2013, Dominique Pellé wrote:
>
>> When using equivalent class [[=x=]], I realized that what I
>> generally want, is to use it on the full strings rather than on
>> a single characters. Searching for "foobar" with...
>>
>> /[[=f=]][[=o=]][
Hi Dominique!
On Mi, 16 Jan 2013, Dominique Pellé wrote:
> When using equivalent class [[=x=]], I realized that what I
> generally want, is to use it on the full strings rather than on
> a single characters. Searching for "foobar" with...
>
> /[[=f=]][[=o=]][[=o=]][[=b=]][[=a=]][[=r=]]
>
> ...
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Bram,
> I recently discovered, that using equivalence classes in regular
> expressions did not match all expected characters. Also I think, the
> current implementation does not work as expected, since searching for
> [[=Ä=]] does only match Ä and neither A nor any
Christian Brabandt wrote:
> Bram,
> I recently discovered, that using equivalence classes in regular
> expressions did not match all expected characters. Also I think, the
> current implementation does not work as expected, since searching for
> [[=Ä=]] does only match Ä and neither A nor any oth
