On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 2:59 AM, Tony Mechelynck wrote:
...
I would add not only .*.swp but even .*.sw? (to ignore .swo .swn etc.),
src/auto/config.mk (which is regenerated by configure from the
config.mk.dist and a couple of others) and runtime/doc/tags (which is
regenerated by make
Tony Mechelynck, 2010-05-28 02:59:
On 28/05/10 01:54, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
You can still add something like .*.swp to .hgignore for the swap files.
I would add not only .*.swp but even .*.sw? (to ignore .swo .swn etc.),
Yes, that would make sense.
src/auto/config.mk (which is
On May 25, 3:37 pm, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
This is moot though, a file edited by several people is very unusual,
and if it does happen an undo file won't be very useful. Better not
enable the undofile option for this kind of file.
I haven't had time to try out the Vim 7.3
On Thu, 27 May 2010, Ben Fritz wrote:
Is persistent undo a buffer-local option? It sounds like perhaps it
should be, so that users can easily turn it on and off on a per-file
basis.
I agree that this is an option that should be possible to set locally.
Setting it with :set should default to
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 25, 3:37 pm, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
This is moot though, a file edited by several people is very unusual,
and if it does happen an undo file won't be very useful. Better not
enable the undofile
Bram Moolenaar, 2010-05-26 22:59:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 25/05/10 22:37, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The undo files are hidden, all version control systems I know will
ignore them. E.g. swap files are normally not a problem.
[...]
For a counterexample, Mercurial tracks
On 28/05/10 01:54, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
Bram Moolenaar, 2010-05-26 22:59:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 25/05/10 22:37, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The undo files are hidden, all version control systems I know will
ignore them. E.g. swap files are normally not a problem.
[...]
For a
On 25/05/10 22:37, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The undo files are hidden, all version control systems I know will
ignore them. E.g. swap files are normally not a problem.
[...]
For a counterexample, Mercurial tracks files regardless of an initial
dot: .hgignore is specifically mentioned as
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 25/05/10 22:37, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
[...]
The undo files are hidden, all version control systems I know will
ignore them. E.g. swap files are normally not a problem.
[...]
For a counterexample, Mercurial tracks files regardless of an initial
dot:
When editing a file over a network or a removable media (USB stick) it's
very easy to misplace the undo file. Also, when a file is edited by
several people, or the same person with different login names or from
different systems, the undo file would go in the wrong place. Also
problems with
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 13:11:34 Milan Vancura wrote:
When editing a file over a network or a removable media (USB stick) it's
very easy to misplace the undo file. Also, when a file is edited by
several people, or the same person with different login names or from
different systems, the
Milan Vancura wrote:
When editing a file over a network or a removable media (USB stick) it's
very easy to misplace the undo file. Also, when a file is edited by
several people, or the same person with different login names or from
different systems, the undo file would go in the wrong
12 matches
Mail list logo
