Elmar Hinz writes:
> Summarising this, you think vim is behaving differently than most
> other vi derivates?
>
> Why is the comment quoted by Christian Brabandt telling, vim tries to
> behave like vi?
"vi derivates" is a bit misleading term. All of the programs I
On 2016-02-04, Christian Brabandt wrote:
> I think, it is this part of the code from op_delete()
>
> /*
>* Imitate the strange Vi behaviour: If the delete spans more than one
>* line and motion_type == MCHAR and the result is a blank line, make
> the
>
Elmar Hinz writes:
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a Python clone of vim, which requires to inspect Vim
> behaviour in detail. Some behaviour looks odd and I like to know if it
> is a bug or what is the reasoning of that behaviour. This is my first
> observation:
>
> Given,
Justin Dearing writes:
> I'd like to edit EBCDIC encoded files in VIM on windows vim
Windows VIM apparently supports all windows codepages as file
encodings [++enc=cpNNN] including cp37 and cp1047, etc. It seems
to work fine for me, though I'm not sure if there are any
Erik Christiansen writes:
> Ah, not simply remapping, then. For UTF-8, Vim has the "8g8" command, to
> hop to the next encoding violation. Unfortunately, there's no mention
> there of any ability to do that for CP1252.
Works for me if the file has been opened with
Kenneth Reid Beesley writes:
> I have a little alias gvim1252 set to
>
> gvim -c “e ++enc=cp1252”
you'll want to add ++bad=keep to that; it should do mostly what you
asked for below with the <81> and such. It'll open the file in read-only
mode, and won't let you
On 2015-12-05, wolfv wrote:
> Sometimes I unintentionally close Vim with many buffers open.
> Then I have to reopen Vim and reopen all the buffers I was working on.
> Is there a way to prevent this, like a plugin that prompts "Multiple
> buffers are open, are you sure you
On 2015-11-25, Roman wrote:
> Why vnoremap "+y in vim visual mode puts all stuff to "* not to "+
> But "+y in vim working fine. In gvim all working fine.
As I understand it, only x11 gvim makes a distinction between "* and "+. In
win32, these both refer to the clipboard. In
On 2015-11-23, bob beckett wrote:
> Thank you for your suggestion. Unfortunately, it finds all non-ASCII
> characters in the entire file, and it does not move the cursor to the first
> Japanese (i.e. non-ASCII) character in the current line.
And does what with them,
On 2015-11-20, Dmitri Vereshchagin wrote:
> * Tony Mechelynck [2015-11-20 23:54]:
>> N°№ U+2116 NUMERO SIGN
>
> Thank you. It is very clever. I suppose you use AZERTY keyboard
> layout. I have ЙЦУКЕН (JCUKEN) keyboard and
John Little writes:
> Maybe you're thinking of gpm mouse support. Install the package gpm,
> and with set mouse=a in your .vimrc, a middle click does a paste, but
> from the unnamed register; you still don't get a separate "* and "+
> AFAICS.
Why not? gpm has a
"'Suresh Govindachar' via vim_use" writes:
> Additional background info: I am on Windows 7 64 bit, running console
> Vim inside ConEmu.
>
> Thanks for the replies. Indeed it was bullets at the beginning of
> each line. Opening the file in gvim shows the bullets.
What
Tim Chase writes:
> And if your screen/$TERM gets corrupted, there's always ed(1) ;-)
Or ex, which is technically "vi by another name" but almost certainly
not what he wants.
To add to the list of suggestions - if they are different, see what the
output of :set termcap
"Karl (Xiangrong) Cai" writes:
> I thought this was pretty clear :-): And here are the steps again:
>
> 1) xterm with a login tcsh shell is created. At this time $c is set to
> /volume/current.
> 2) do " setenv c /volumeNew/current". As this time "echo $c" in this
> shell shows
Tim Chase writes:
> On 2015-10-19 09:52, Paul wrote:
>> For a reason that I haven't been able to suss out, "fictious" not
>> recognized as spelling error.
>
> Not sure what OS you're on or what system dictionary you're using,
> but that word/spelling is present in my
>
>
"Karl (Xiangrong) Cai" writes:
> Regarding " What is your _exact_ set of steps that results in echo $c
> showing /volumeNEW/current"
>
> 641% echo $c
> /volume/current
> 642% setenv c /volumeNew/current
> 643% echo $c
> /volumeNew/current
Which shell is this? The original one,
"Karl (Xiangrong) Cai" writes:
> And in vim, when I do 1) echo $c, and 2) let x = system(“echo $c”);
> and then “echo x”, both shows “/volume/current”, which is expected;
> Then inside this shell I set this variable to another value:
> <<<
> 603% setenv c /volumeNEW/current
>
> Paul gmail.com> writes:
>> I'm finding that cygwin's gvim no longer seems to use the same cryptic
>> font names as xfontsel. They are much simpler names. So it seems
>> that gvim doesn't use the X-window fonts. I'm at a loss for how to
>> select cygwin packages that will expand my font
18 matches
Mail list logo