Re: More SCSI Voodoo or something...

2002-04-13 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- Scott Holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, now it's my turn for some SCSI problems ;) > > I recently picked up a SCSI card and memory card for > my IIgs so I could > have some fun with it, so I pulled out the old 20 > meg external I had on my > Plus originally. The IIgs wouldn't see i

IIcx probs

2002-04-13 Thread Brad Bobak
Hi, I have a Mac IIcx w/ external scsi drive. I can't get any mac cd of mine to automount.. How do I go about getting the cd to mount?? thx.. Bradd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) __ Find, Connect Date! http://personals.yahoo.ca -- Vi

Re: Apple IIGS / Mac Network

2002-04-13 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- Wendell III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > could all print. The interesting thing was that I > don't think the IIGS > machines had any sort of hard drive in them. > However, on power-up, they > would instantly go to this boring, blue-colored menu > system from which TONS > of MECC and variou

Re: Apple IIGS / Mac Network

2002-04-13 Thread kapnkid
Knowing nothing about the networking capabilities of the AppleIIgs, I can only talk about the AppleII+. My cousin worked for "Mountain Computer" and he got me a ROM card which would allow the AppleII+ to 'boot up' to any program on the ROM, as soon as it was turned on. Without checking the card a

Re: Apple IIGS / Mac Network

2002-04-13 Thread Cameron Kaiser
> Presumably, they were somehow booting across the network, from the Mac II? Yes, they were. I have a SE/30 and a IIgs that were originally configured this way, and the IIgs can netboot from the SE/30. I've never been able to get the IIgs to boot into GS/OS but it will come up in ProDOS. Only RO

Re: More SCSI Voodoo or something...

2002-04-13 Thread Scott Holder
At 06:38 PM 4/13/2002 -0400, you wrote: >Well, now it's my turn for some SCSI problems ;) > Here's an update. I opened up the SCSI case and stuck a formerly internal Apple drive on the connector, set the ID via a jumper, and it worked fine. So it's not the case. Hooked it back up to the origina

More SCSI Voodoo or something...

2002-04-13 Thread Scott Holder
Well, now it's my turn for some SCSI problems ;) I recently picked up a SCSI card and memory card for my IIgs so I could have some fun with it, so I pulled out the old 20 meg external I had on my Plus originally. The IIgs wouldn't see it, so I've tried hooking it up to my various Macs with no

Apple IIGS / Mac Network

2002-04-13 Thread Wendell III
Greetings everyone! I was pondering my earliest memories of Apple computers today, and came across something I have not seen since. Perhaps one of you can shed some light on this? At my elementary school, circa 1989-1992(?), was a computer lab full of Apple IIGS computers, several ImageWriter I

Re: basic networking question

2002-04-13 Thread A. Daniel King
Teri Pittman wrote: > > I am curious about what networking topology Apple used for Apple Talk. Is > this star, bus, ring, or something completely different. > > Having wasted a year of my life getting a CNE, I try not to dig too deep > into networking topics. The discussion does make me a bit

Re: my internet problem

2002-04-13 Thread A. Daniel King
In a mixed network, TCP/IP is nearly a must. There is no more commonly spoken network language out there. The key word here is 'mixed'. DHCP is a luxury, but good if you can do it. It's worth the setup time if you've got machines coming and going. You can tell most DHCP servers to allocate a

Re: benchmarks Re: Upgrade cards

2002-04-13 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- Darren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >As I say it more likely shuts off all the functions > and just uses the > >50MHz CPU and the 16MHz FPU, hence the drop in FPU > performance. > > > A 50mhz cpu and a 16 mhz fpu can run together? Yes, when one is on an accelerator card. = http://www.

Re: Wonder why they don't do that with Mac's

2002-04-13 Thread Scott Holder
At 05:46 PM 4/13/2002 +0100, you wrote: > > > Is it OK with you if put these (and more) into a system 7.1 and a > system 6? > > > > > >-mart > > > And how would you do that? Stephen > >In Resedit. You can fool around with the alert message there. Great Fun! > >-mart There's no reason you could

Re: Wonder why they don't do that with Mac's

2002-04-13 Thread Martien Bakker
> > Is it OK with you if put these (and more) into a system 7.1 and a system 6? > > > >-mart > And how would you do that? Stephen In Resedit. You can fool around with the alert message there. Great Fun! -mart -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by and... Small Dog Elect

Re: Wonder why they don't do that with Mac's

2002-04-13 Thread Stephen Foster
> > >This is great fun! > > Is it OK with you if put these (and more) into a system 7.1 and a system 6? > >-mart And how would you do that? Stephen -- - "A man cannot step into the same river twice; for neither is it the same river nor is it the same man." Heraclitus c. 540- c. 480 BCE --

Re: benchmarks Re: Upgrade cards

2002-04-13 Thread Darren
> > > >As I say it more likely shuts off all the functions and just uses the >50MHz CPU and the 16MHz FPU, hence the drop in FPU performance. > A 50mhz cpu and a 16 mhz fpu can run together? -- Vintage Macs is sponsored by and... Small Dog Electronicshttp://www.sm

Re: benchmarks Re: Upgrade cards

2002-04-13 Thread Mark Benson
On Saturday, April 13, 2002, at 08:52 AM, Gregg Eshelman wrote: > > --- Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well turning off both the PowerCache and PowerMath >> options drops FPU >> performance from 0.381 to 0.280 average (1 = Quadra >> 605). I think that >> shows a difference - don't you

benchmarks Re: Upgrade cards

2002-04-13 Thread Gregg Eshelman
--- Mark Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well turning off both the PowerCache and PowerMath > options drops FPU > performance from 0.381 to 0.280 average (1 = Quadra > 605). I think that > shows a difference - don't you? That's a 33% speed > drop in FPU processes. What about the CPU perfor