I've been reasonably successful getting a "new" Mac IIci together.
I got a Mac IIci, 128MB of RAM, a Daystar accelerator, and a Radis
Thunder GT graphics card.
The machine is still awfully slow running iCab. Otherwise, the
accelerator had a huge impact on speed.
I also noticed some anomalies
> I have some more questions about my Mac IIci.
>
> First off, I am thinking of adding a Daystar 030 Direct Slot 50 Mhz
> accelerator, but this would require the removal of my Apple Mac IIci cache
> card. Question: Would this increase or decrease performance?
Increase, and quite some. For me
--- DeVaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone -- me again!
>
> I have some more questions about my Mac IIci.
>
> First off, I am thinking of adding a Daystar 030
> Direct Slot 50 Mhz
> accelerator, but this would require the removal of
> my Apple Mac IIci cache
> card. Question: Would t
> I know there are limitations on the power supply of a Mac IIsi, but are
> there any on the Mac IIci?
>
What are the limitations for the IIsi?? My friend has one. She has the
Daystar 50mhz, maxed out the Ram, 500mb internal, 500mb external, and a
external CD-ROM. Don't remember how much RAM, b
At 20:37 -0400 on 12/07/02, DeVaul wrote:
>First off, I am thinking of adding a Daystar 030 Direct Slot 50 Mhz
>accelerator, but this would require the removal of my Apple Mac IIci cache
>card. Question: Would this increase or decrease performance? The
Increase, by about a factor of two. The
--- DeVaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone -- me again!
>
> I have some more questions about my Mac IIci.
>
> First off, I am thinking of adding a Daystar 030
> Direct Slot 50 Mhz
> accelerator, but this would require the removal of
> my Apple Mac IIci cache
> card. Question: Would t
Hi Everyone -- me again!
I have some more questions about my Mac IIci.
First off, I am thinking of adding a Daystar 030 Direct Slot 50 Mhz
accelerator, but this would require the removal of my Apple Mac IIci cache
card. Question: Would this increase or decrease performance? The
accelerator ca
Apologies for the 24-hour delay but a certain rogue listnanny (not one for
this list) has decided he has a personal vendetta against me. Dan has been
notified.
At 19:09 -0400 on 06/07/02, Jason Trunzo wrote:
>By the '040 card do you mean Sonnet's 040 Presto card? If so, that
>substantially inc
Apologies for the 24-hour delay but a certain rogue listnanny (not one for
this list) has decided he has a personal vendetta against me. Dan has been
notified.
At 19:12 -0700 on 06/07/02, Gregg Eshelman wrote:
>It's an 040, best it will do is 8.1. If it's the
>DayStar Turbo 040 it's even better
At 07:09 PM 7/6/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Howdee!
>By the '040 card do you mean Sonnet's 040 Presto card? If so, that
>substantially increases your processing speed (to 55 or 60mhz I
>think) and allows you to run up to OS 8.6 on your IIci.
8.6 requires a PPC to run. An 040 will only run up to 8.1
--- Jason Trunzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdee!
> By the '040 card do you mean Sonnet's 040 Presto
> card? If so, that
> substantially increases your processing speed (to 55
> or 60mhz I
> think) and allows you to run up to OS 8.6 on your
> IIci.
It's an 040, best it will do is 8.1. I
> I have a ci with 8 megs ram that seems to have a
>troubled floppy drive. I'd like to swap in a floppy
>drive pulled from a LC II, and I removed the Hard
>Drive which sits upon this plastic partition. The
>floppy drive seems entombed beneath this plastic
>partition, and I'm wondering what's the
I have a ci with 8 megs ram that seems to have a
troubled floppy drive. I'd like to swap in a floppy
drive pulled from a LC II, and I removed the Hard
Drive which sits upon this plastic partition. The
floppy drive seems entombed beneath this plastic
partition, and I'm wondering what's the best wa
13 matches
Mail list logo
