On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Mike Miller wrote:
> It's on Solaris 8. We now believe the problem is caused by ssh-X11 port
> forwarding occupying port 6010. Port 6010 (DISPLAY :10) is the first
> used by ssh.
I have finally demonstrated that this was exactly the problem. My
computer was connected to t
>
> Mike Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 12/04/02 12:49 PM
>
>
> To: David Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
> Subject:RE: "A VNC
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd assumed that there weren't any operating systems vulverable to "dead
> socket"s, but that sure sounds like what you've got. A socket isn't
> closed properly when a program exits, and the IP stack doesn't make it
> available. Only cure - reboot (
upport2 on AIM
"There are some who call me Tim?"
Mike Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/04/02 12:49 PM
To: David Howe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject:
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, David Howe wrote:
> Is it possible a non-vnc x-server is running on 10? or that port 5910 is
> in use by some other app?
It looks like something is running on 6010, and that must be the problem.
Thanks to Corni Beerse for pointing it out!
Now to figure out what's using 6010!
Is it possible a non-vnc x-server is running on 10? or that port 5910 is in use by
some other app?
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, David Howe wrote:
> Possibly the .pid file (that vncserver checks to see if a instance is
> already running) is still in the user's ~/.vnc?
No. It's perplexing. There is no sign of a pid file and vncserver -kill
:10 won't work because it can't find the pid! I don't know wh
Possibly the .pid file (that vncserver checks to see if a instance is already running)
is still in the user's ~/.vnc?
___
VNC-List mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.realvnc.com/mailman/listinfo/vnc-list
List'
Subject: RE: "A VNC server is already running as :10", but it isn't!
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Miller
> I'm still using old Xvnc version 3.3, running on Solaris 8.
> I set u
I see this all the time on my Linux box when I reboot the computer without running a
"vncserver -kill :10". It usually complains that there is a .pid file not in ~/.vnc
but in "/tmp/.X11/" or something like that. Deleting the appropriate lock file
fixes the problem.
Greg
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2002,
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, William Hooper wrote:
> Doesn't VNC start the session you requested after you set the password
> (you don't need to run it a second time)?
No, you do have to run it a second time, at least with Xvnc 3.3.
> Are you sure that there isn't a server running on :10?
Yes. Using a
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mike Miller
> I'm still using old Xvnc version 3.3, running on Solaris 8.
> I set up VNC
> for a student and had him start it up on :10. It prompted
> for password,
> which he entered, then I had h
12 matches
Mail list logo
