Mike Carrell writes,
> Anyone with a new awareness of China should get a copy of
"1421 The Year China Discovered America" and also dig into
the 1421 website,
There is local (SF Bay area) connection to this story :
http://www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/7792971.htm?1c
Supposedly one of
Mike Carrell wrote:
>
> Ed Storms wrote:
> >
> > John Fields wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:48:27 -0500, you wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >Dr. Storms wrote: "I think you all are missing the point of the missile
> > > >defense system. It
> > > >is to defend us from China in 10 years, not
Vortexians, I've been reading various posts on China, and have
decided to make a few comments. I was shopping for a set of pump
pliers. I purchased a Chinese made set but they slipped when a
grasped a nut. I subsequently returned them and purchased an American
made set. I picked up a Chinese ma
Keith wrote I'm not sure why W. is so anxious to sell..
Maybe he knows something we dont.
I have pondered that question since year 2001. Perhaps
we have 2 Republican parties..
Richard
<>
Ed Storms wrote:
>
> John Fields wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:48:27 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >Dr. Storms wrote: "I think you all are missing the point of the missile
> > >defense system. It
> > >is to defend us from China in 10 years, not NK now."
> > >
> > >Possibly, however the pr
If gravity, gravitons, had a speed c_g less than the speed of light c, and
gravity began with the big bang, then objects exceeding c_g at the time of
the big bang could outrun gravity itself. It seems reasonable that c_g >=
c. Even if in all cases c_g >= c, objects near the speed of c or even jus
Hi Nick.
You write:
>So yeah, with hand wound toroids
>there is potential for leakage. I would guess that if
>one could up the permeability of the torus material,
>leakage would diminish - but do they make such a
>ferrite? Fast yet furious; with low hysteresis, yet
>the permeability of "moo" met
> I would guess that if
> one could up the permeability of the torus material,
> leakage would diminish - but do they make such a
> ferrite? Fast yet furious; with low hysteresis, yet
> the permeability of "moo" metal?
maybe?
http://www.inframat.com/nano.htm
Hey, speaking of potting the wind
Hey Ed + John.
Ed writes:
>Yes, because China is gaining more by buying the US in contrast to
>taking.
Exactly; but doesn't this solve the problem? Red seems not to understand
that when our government borrows money to pay for things rather than
tax, what it is doing is selling the country to fore
John Fields wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:42:02 -0700, you wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >John Fields wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:48:27 -0500, you wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >Dr. Storms wrote: "I think you all are missing the point of the missile
> >> >defense system. It
> >> >is to defend us
Keith,
After I potted the unit, as I recall, I lost the
effect on all materials. As metals go, I had tried
little niblets, BBs and rods of copper, aluminum, and
bismuth. Now I DID NOT try a long rod suspended
horizontally through the holes of a horizontal facing
toroid pair, howevah. I agree th
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:42:02 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>John Fields wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:48:27 -0500, you wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >Dr. Storms wrote: "I think you all are missing the point of the missile
>> >defense system. It
>> >is to defend us from China in 10 years, not NK now."
>> >
>>
Hey Jones,
you write:
>Remember that genius who claimed to have invented an
>antigraivty device, but oops, he can't demonstrate it to the
>public because he lost it when it went sailing through the
>ceiling of his lab into space ? I hope that wan't Wallace,
>was it?
That would be JR Searl. Wallac
Hey Nick.
I'm still of the opinion that leakage flux is
the causative agent here, at least for the conductive
material being moved by the coils. I can see
your explaination would make sense for the lesser
magnitude effect seen with the non-conductors,
although I would expect some effect due to the
Gentlemen,
I think it ws back in about 2000 or so that I came
across the website of the ATG group that had developed
the little nested toroid experiment. Don't recall the
name of the fellow I corresponded with briefly, but I
spent maybe 3 weeks trying to replicate their set-up
and claims.
It was
Horace Heffner scolds,
> >As I recall there were recently a number of vortexians
who doubted that
> >the vector potential can be put to any practical use.
> If you are talking about what I wrote then you completely
overlooked the
> significance.
No, I wasn't referring to any particular posting..
John Fields wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:48:27 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >
> >Dr. Storms wrote: "I think you all are missing the point of the missile
> >defense system. It
> >is to defend us from China in 10 years, not NK now."
> >
> >Possibly, however the premature deployment will inhibit onl
"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate." -
Henry J. Tillman
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 08:48:27 -0500, you wrote:
>
>Dr. Storms wrote: "I think you all are missing the point of the missile
>defense system. It
>is to defend us from China in 10 years, not NK now."
>
>Possibly, however the premature deployment will inhibit only the irrational.
>China knows it is ine
Dr. Storms wrote: "I think you all are missing the point of the missile
defense system. It
is to defend us from China in 10 years, not NK now."
Possibly, however the premature deployment will inhibit only the irrational.
China knows it is ineffective.
At 11:08 AM 12/19/4, Jones Beene wrote:
>As I recall there were recently a number of vortexians who doubted that
>the vector potential can be put to any practical use.
If you are talking about what I wrote then you completely overlooked the
significance.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
At 2:55 AM 12/20/4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Dear Horace,
>Thanks for the response. This is my initial foray into the area. I disagree
>about the polarizing beam splitter - it transmits, not absorbs. Losses and
>attenuation can be minimised. Yes signal will be subject to noise but this
>can be err
Sorry chaps and chapessess,
Gonna have to unsubscribe because I just won't be in
to read the list messages. When I get back there will be probably hundreds
which will take our exchange server (snore!) about an hour to sort out with all
the uni. traffic.
Bye bye,
Remi.
Dear Horace,
Thanks for the response. This is my initial foray into the area. I disagree
about the polarizing beam splitter - it transmits, not absorbs. Losses and
attenuation can be minimised. Yes signal will be subject to noise but this
can be error corrected out. As long as some signal get throu
24 matches
Mail list logo