At 01:45 am 21-02-05 -0600, you wrote:
snip
I've been reading about the Yuri Popatov's Yusmar machine, which
AFAIK, produces LENR's in an aquas solution by means of a vortex.
Heat is a big item with Russians, and electricity costs something
there too. The fact that he has lots of orders for
thomas malloy wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Ed Storms responded'
Once again, we are being treated to one more example of exaggeration
and BS. The Taleyarkhan cavitation work is hot fusion occurring in
bubbles, not cold fusion.
I don't understand how hot fusion in bubbles differs from what the
thomas malloy wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Ed Storms responded'
I've been reading about the Yuri Popatov's Yusmar machine, which
AFAIK, produces LENR's in an aquas solution by means of a vortex.
Heat is a big item with Russians, and electricity costs something
there too. The fact that he has
Uggh
:)
Hi Terry.
I laughed too when I saw this, then I got kind of annoyed.
Naming a nuclear attack submarine like this after him is in
poor taste at best.
http://cryptome.org/mmp/jimmy-carter.htm
As well, that the name should invoke some fear in the enemy;
even the common swamp rabbit is nonplussed
the thing to recognize also is that the evangelical christians are a
minority of christians. being christian does not mean following
falwell and robertson, believing that god created the earth in 7 days
(i say to let people correct me, they love to) or that homosexuality
is an abomination (as is
Note: forwarded message attached.
Do you Yahoo!?
The all-new My Yahoo! What will yours do?---BeginMessage---
Yea, I bet neither the crew nor the prez are too happy about it these days.
Thanks for the web ref. I wondered how that bloody minisub got deployed so quickly in "Hunt for Red
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 16:52, Horace Heffner wrote:
At 11:45 AM 2/16/5, Terry Blanton wrote:
There, they finally said it:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mars_life_050216.html
It's about time. However, they seem to be barking up the wrong tree, or is
that down the wrong hole?
At 6:18 AM 2/21/5, Terry Blanton wrote:
(Are you paying attention, Horace?)
Yep, I'm here, now, if a bit late.
This is truly SAD:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,148207,00.html
ANCHORAGE ó Anchorage (search) police said a woman upset about an
impending break-up with her boyfriend cut off
One of the most frustrating things about the internet, especiallyto
any alternative energy advocate who seeks to find, weed-outand support, in
every reasonable way, or even try to replicate ... the *best reasonable*
solutions available which address the looming fossil-fuel-reliance
At 10:46 AM 2/21/5, thomas malloy wrote [in the BBC Horizon to feature
Taleyarkhan] thread:
Do you recall what the thermal efficiency that LANL observed was?
It was measured 98 percent, which I assume includes a 2 percent error.
Following or some hilights from the vrtex posts at the time.
At
At 2:32 PM 2/21/5, Standing Bear wrote:
On Wednesday 16 February 2005 16:52, Horace Heffner wrote:
At 11:45 AM 2/16/5, Terry Blanton wrote:
There, they finally said it:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/mars_life_050216.html
It's about time. However, they seem to be barking up the
Slight correction:
At 10:46 AM 2/21/5, thomas malloy wrote [in the BBC Horizon to feature
Taleyarkhan] thread:
Do you recall what the thermal efficiency that LANL observed was?
It was measured 96 percent, which I assume includes a 4 percent error.
Regards,
Horace Heffner
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:58:28 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
here, mixed in with lots of potential BS. Caveat Lector. But remember, if you
do not adequately separate the wheat from the chafe... well, you get the extra
fiber, so that is not all bad, and helps keep you
Neutron aficionados will enjoy these papers by Menlove et al. from 1990
and 1991:
MenloveHOlowbackgro.pdf
MenloveHOreproducib.pdf
Neutrons from titanium hydrides.
- Jed
See:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?chanID=sa006colID=5articleID=00059015-99C5-1213-987F83414B7F011C
PHYSICS
Back to Square One
Government review repeats cold fusion conclusions
By Charles Q. Choi
After 15 years, cold fusion got a second chance at legitimacy from the U.S.
Department of Energy,
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell
Neutron aficionados will enjoy these papers by Menlove et
al. from 1990 and 1991:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MenloveHOlowbackgro.pdfMenloveHOlowbackgro.pdf
Most interesting.
Especially in regard to recent past postings and speculation
about
Robin wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:58:28 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
here, mixed in with lots of potential BS. Caveat Lector. But remember, if
you do not adequately separate the wheat from the chafe... well, you get the
extra fiber, so that is not all bad, and helps
I just finished with Robin and I find some of the same ideas here form
Jones. (Deep breath) here we go again:
snip
Instead the really frustrating information is the tantalizing stuff which
appears from brilliant, well funded, probably genius-level researchers like
Mills/BLP who will publish
Mike,
Mills' is reluctant to have any association with CF, LENR,
CANR and nuclear phenomena.
Does that sound rational to you? Does that sound like the
well-considered logic of a person committed to solving our
looming ecological crisis?
The cynic might say that it sounds more like an egoist
I suspect most Vorts are fans of Jules Verne and Arthur C. Clark, even if
they are not whole-heartedly into Sci-Fi. Those two prophetshave shown us
that good Sci-Fi easily presages real technological progress.
Two other candidates, coming in from the cold, arenames to add to
that list of
21 matches
Mail list logo
