Thomas, global temperature is the result of just two things: incident solar
power, and ability of the planet to retain the heat. Failing to see that both
phenomenons are equally important amounts to wearing blinds. The more solar
power we get, the more we must reduce, or at least stop
Now you mention it, anybody knows if anything positive came out of their
Toyota/Technova funded CF lab in Nice, France?
Michel
- Original Message -
From: David Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 12:13 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Global warming
Thomas, global temperature is the result of just two things
Correction: until our non solar heat output (= non renewable energy
consumption) becomes sizeable compared to the solar input, as previously
discussed.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Michel Jullian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Yet another bio-fuel turns out be an environmental nightmare. See:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/business/worldbusiness/31biofuel.html?pagewanted=1ei=5070en=f15ff4f804f7d47aex=1170997200
QUOTES:
AMSTERDAM, Jan. 25 Just a few years ago,
politicians and environmental groups in the
Michel Jullian wrote:
Now you mention it, anybody knows if anything positive came out of
their Toyota/Technova funded CF lab in Nice, France?
Many positive results came from this effort:
1. Johnson-Matthey learned how to make Pd that works nearly every
time. They characterize the material
You know what happens when you assume?
It makes an ass out of u and me?
Dr Ball won't make the headlines by pointing out that plant growth is
stimulated by an increase in CO2 levels I am afraid. Indeed there is some self
correction built in the system, so what? You really believe climate
its all in teh execution.
On 2/7/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yet another bio-fuel turns out be an environmental nightmare. See:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/31/business/worldbusiness/31biofuel.html?pagewanted=1ei=5070en=f15ff4f804f7d47aex=1170997200
QUOTES:
AMSTERDAM, Jan. 25
Long time no talk Jed, you are dearly missed you-know-where.
Thanks for the rich historical details, but am I correct in understanding that
nothing positive _actually came out_ of it, in spite of various hints and
possibilities of a different outcome?
Although I agree to a large extent that
Michel Jullian wrote:
Dr Ball won't make the headlines by pointing out that plant growth is stimulated by an increase in CO2 levels I am afraid.
The increased plant growth is a self correcting element that's engaging
that it won't be reported is because the press has the same agenda that
Michel Jullian wrote:
Thanks for the rich historical details, but am I correct in
understanding that nothing positive _actually came out_ of it . . .
That is incorrect. See the paper I referenced earlier:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RouletteTresultsofi.pdf
74 watts continuously for 40 to
thomas malloy wrote:
Dr Ball won't make the headlines by pointing out that plant growth
is stimulated by an increase in CO2 levels I am afraid.
The increased plant growth is a self correcting element . . .
It is self correcting in a sense, but before the correction runs its
course, it will
Actually I think I recall that sun light measurements over the decades are
showing that less sun is reaching the surface at least.
On 2/8/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:
Dr Ball won't make the headlines by pointing out that plant growth
is stimulated by an
This is not exactly a book review-reread of Virtual Light - which was the
first novel in what has become known as the 'bridge trilogy' by SciFi visionary
(and one of the more infamous 'Nam-era draft-dodgers) William Gibson. This post
is really more about bio-mimicry and future of (non-origami)
OK, I admit it, this is pretty boring. But you folks are the only
people I can think of who might possibly respond to this with something
other than a glazed look and the question, You did what? Uh ... why?
The answer, of course, is just cause I wanted to see for myself.
Basement
Pathological scepticism is not the same as deliberately lying to cover up
meaningful results.
P.
At 09:43 AM 2/7/2007 -0500, you wrote:
Michel Jullian wrote:
Now you mention it, anybody knows if anything positive came out of
their Toyota/Technova funded CF lab in Nice, France?
Many
Philip Winestone wrote:
Pathological scepticism is not the same as deliberately lying to cover up
meaningful results.
That is true. But in the case of the NHE and Toyota, I sense that the decision
makers do not believe the results, so they lie about them. I think that is also
how the people
Jed Rothwell wrote..
but that is a political problem, not scientific.
Howdy Jed,
A keen insight you have. Things happen in the world that most attribute to
conspiracy when they should be blamed on attitude. Given an opportunity, laws
of human nature demand actions be met with inaction of
Well done Stephen! To make the measurement truly accessible to all, the next
step would be to eliminate the digital scope, replacing it with a handful of
inexpensive digital components. One could use a fast clocked counter IC started
by the near end signal and stopped by the far end one.
18 matches
Mail list logo
