Hi Harry,
These days I am more concerned with Big Sister than Big Brother.
Why is that?
Dave
Hi Steven,
OTOH it's my understanding that time dilation has been confirmed.
Extremely brief half-life's of certain sub atomic particles that are
speeding close to C have been detected to decay within a slowed down time
period reference from our perspective. At least, that's my understanding.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2027227,00.html
US defence contractor looks for quantum leap in radar research
David Adam
Tuesday March 6, 2007
The Guardian
They designed an exploding cigar to kill Fidel Castro and hired
fortune-tellers to fight the cold war. Now the US
Hi Dave,
Aspects of SR have always intrigued me, perhaps for its Alice-in-Wunderland
spatial analysis qualities. With that qualification in mind...
...
Another false prediction of SR is that it doesn't matter
which object is moving [at] what velocity, since it is believed
there is no fixed
I saw a cute statement in this argument:
It's easier to deliver an electron than a proton.
Of course, with H2 you get both. :-)
Hi Terry,
IMHO, we will only succeed in tying ourselves into unsolvable knots
similar to religious fanaticism if we insist there MUST exist an ABSOLUTE
frame of reference. SR, would seem to suggest there ain't no such animal and
never was - period.
Ah, but that is the key. SR is not
This is the Petrocracy at works, folks:
http://www.herald-review.com/articles/2007/03/01/news/local_news/1021491.txt
Outrageous indeed! There is a related case here in France where they want to
charge a farmer who's been selling vegetable oil as a fuel a tax called the
TIPP, where the PP initials mean produits petroliers, which is even more
outrageous than this story since the product he sells isn't petroleum
David Thomson wrote:
I think I'm getting tired of trying to show people the Aether Physics Model.
I'm ready to just turn within and work on my own development and let people
discover the answers to physics for themselves.
Sorry to jump in, as my time only permits me to follow my own threads
Hi Paul,
Let me see, Einstein explained the photoelectric effect, but none of the
others items in your list rings a bell when I look over his papers. I have
written a 27 page basic introduction to the theory, which I had to keep as
short as possible but still present the theory. In that paper,
Fly-in-the-ointment?
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/SzpakSfurtherevi.pdf
There is a bit of a turf-war brewing here, as I had sensed.
Szpak et al. sez: A model from a chemist’s perspective that is
consistent with the state of the system, imposed constraints
and the nature of the electron—nucleus
Michel Jullian wrote:
COP is the ratio of output power to input power.
Harry
Same thing actually: Eout/Ein = Pout*t / Pin*t = Pout/Pin
Jed's COP=1.2 example was given in terms of energy (1200 joules out / 1000
joules in), my COP=4 example was in terms of power (1000 watts out / 250
You're right Harry it's more rigorous to define the COP as the ratio of output
power to input power. Note that for heat pumps it is often used even more
rigorously to describe the ratio of output (moved) thermal power to input
mechanical power, i.e. taking the motor or engine's efficiency out
David Thomson wrote:
Hi Harry,
Is y = xa^2 not an equation?
Yes, it is the equation of a straight line with slope a^2.
Of course, it is an equation. All the variables are truly variables and
have the same dimension of one. Do you really think that E=mc^2 is the
equation of a straight
David Thomson wrote:
Hi Paul,
Let me see, Einstein explained the photoelectric effect, but none of the
others items in your list rings a bell when I look over his papers.
Hi,
I'll point out the difference. Einstein's paper was aimed at one thing, The
Photoelectric Effect. I provided you
Michel Jullian wrote:
---
You're right Harry it's more rigorous to define the COP as the ratio of
output power to input power. Note that for heat pumps it is often used even more
rigorously to describe the ratio of output (moved) thermal power to input
mechanical power, i.e. taking the motor
Hello again, Dave,
Nuclear fission, regardless of what isotope is involved,
results in the unbinding of nuclei and hence should absorb
energy and convert it to matter. This is not the case.
It is not the case because nuclei heavier than iron tend to
be inherently unstable. But I am no
I'm afraid their ordeal might not be over. The Feds will be next.
This will become a problem for Tesla and with BEVs in general. This
is also why the Gov't needs to sell a fuel . . . some kind of fuel.
Highways are maintained by the federal excise tax on fuel. If you're
not selling fuel, you
Sorry if he is a friend of yours, but maybe his particular definition for COP
can be guessed by reading this page...
http://www.randi.org/jr/051702.html
(in which Naudin is mistakenly taken for a scientist BTW, Randi even calls him
Dr Naudin :)
...or any of the 1 others Google finds when
OOps! Now I am.
On 3/9/07, Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/9/07, David Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Terry,
waves and looks around
I'm not in this thread. :-)
Terry
On 3/9/07, David Thomson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Terry,
waves and looks around
I'm not in this thread. :-)
Terry
Michel Jullian wrote:
Sorry if he is a friend of yours, but maybe his particular definition for COP
can be guessed by reading this page...
http://www.randi.org/jr/051702.html
(in which Naudin is mistakenly taken for a scientist BTW, Randi even calls
him Dr Naudin :)
...or any of the
Terry Blanton wrote:
This will become a problem for Tesla and with BEVs in general. This
is also why the Gov't needs to sell a fuel . . . some kind of fuel.
Highways are maintained by the federal excise tax on fuel. If you're
not selling fuel, you have no $$ for highways and the corruption that
-Forwarded Message-from Akira Kawasaki
From: What's New [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mar 9, 2007 1:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [BOBPARKS-WHATSNEW] What's New Friday March 9, 2007
WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 9 Mar 07 Washington, DC
1. GLOBAL CLIMATE: ARE THOSE WHITE
David Thomson wrote:
Hi Harry,
These days I am more concerned with Big Sister than Big Brother.
Why is that?
Dave
Big Sister is hard at work making the sexes equal.
Harry
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 9 Mar 2007 09:38:40 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,2027227,00.html
US defence contractor looks for quantum leap in radar research
David Adam
Tuesday March 6, 2007
The Guardian
They designed an exploding cigar to
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 4:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Outrage !!
I do not know whether highway taxes are more likely to invite corruption
than other kinds, but I think we should
Turn up the heater, do go for a drive in the summer and find less depressing
music and maybe environment.
Of course there is an answer to all of this, but it won't be found in your
current mindset...
Be proactive and productive, change things don't just reduce how fast you
are taking a part in
On 3/9/07, Kyle R. Mcallister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I drive a long way each day to work and back, compared to many, and probably
a long way in your opinion. About 40 miles round trip.
The average commute in Atlanta is 34 miles one way. I personally do
23 miles one way.
We have many who
Ok, so the thermite, the squib explosions that can be plainly seen and heard
(and recorded) and which burnt people and thew them around, and went off
before the collapse and thermite detected, buildings pancaking at freefall
speeds, the people doing work on the building before 911 (an
Great, so $1360 a month, let's hope Jed doesn't get a job in government.
Personally I think that user pays is generally a poor idea, I'm more of a
flat rate all you can eat kind of guy, it is much more freeing, people don't
need to be obsessing over every mile like that.
But at the very least
Michael Jullian wrote;
\
Sorry if he is a friend of yours, but maybe his particular definition for COP
can be guessed by reading this page...
http://www.randi.org/jr/051702.html
(in which Naudin is mistakenly taken for a scientist BTW, Randi even calls him Dr Naudin :)
...or any of the 1
32 matches
Mail list logo
