Hi,
If the ponds are covered with transparent plastic, and inflated with a slight
overpressure, then fresh water can be collected as a byproduct.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rvanspaa/
Hi Horace,
Would you consider gravitational charge to be the same thing as mass? If
not, why not?
How do you use the term virtual such that it applies to the real world?
That is, how can an object exist without really existing?
Super massive black holes are hypothesized to exist, but as of
Horace wrote (on 4-6-07):
An isomorphism between gravity and electromagnetism
was developed. In this theory of gravimagnetism the
graviton is defined as the analog of the virtual photon.
The graviphoton is defined as the analog of the photon ...
Hi Horace,
It's good to hear from you. I'd
Horace,
Most interesting and perceptive, as always.
Looks like a 'spring thaw' has settled in over the far North, allowing
you to metaphorically peek-out at the lower 48 once again g
One quick question, and I'm sure you will be getting plenty more, since
you have been focusing on this
We have mentioned AirGen before.
http://www.evworld.com/news.cfm?newsid=11039
They have developed kind of a Grove Cell - a cross between a battery and
a H2 generator (electrolysis cell) which uses an active nano-colloid, in
addition to shorted electrodes.
The idea is that you pair it with a
On Apr 7, 2007, at 6:56 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Horace,
Most interesting and perceptive, as always.
Looks like a 'spring thaw' has settled in over the far North,
allowing you to metaphorically peek-out at the lower 48 once again g
One quick question, and I'm sure you will be getting
On Apr 7, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Hi Horace,
Hello Jack,
The old posting you provided looks like it might pre-date my
solidification of the gravimagnetic isomorphism concepts, though it
certainly contains some of the thinking. In any case, though I
expect it won't
If I've already sent this please forgive my senility. 8^)
I don't have the time for an extended discussion. However, I will
try to answer your questions of the moment.
On Apr 7, 2007, at 3:15 AM, David Thomson wrote:
Hi Horace,
Would you consider gravitational charge to be the same
On Apr 7, 2007, at 6:56 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
In your earlier paper, you cited Jefimenko's idea that the
correspondence between gravity and the electromagnetic field is
based on causality and the effects of retardation. Is that another
way (and precedent) of saying the same thing ?
I
Dear Vo,
Following is-are some general comment. The contributor will delete text
that is not
germane ,per se
Should the reader[s] wish to commnet or contribute:
(A) Please use clear text OK to refer to known text, contribution
(B) Prefer BBGB and ...or.HB NB BS
10 matches
Mail list logo
