Once they have given up their excess electron(s) to the front surface of the
ball, they become neutrals so they go with the wind their former colleagues
behind are still entraining, around the ball and beyond.
Now one might ask, what's special with the front of the ball? Shouldn't the
ions be
On Jun 3, 2007, at 1:23 PM, William Beaty wrote:
How are these filament-shaped
flows even possible?
I have a hypothesis. Suppose the ion jet sustains a mostly neutral
current, with positive ions and electrons (or possibly some negative
ions formed by air molecules taking on an extra
I just got around to reading the experimental results at:
http://amasci.com/weird/unusual/airexp.html
I was surprised to see: - I can't see any effects from a 3/4
neodymium magnet. At 10nA, the magnetism around each thread must be
incredibly small. That's an indication the ratio of q/m is
Hi Horace,
I had read about the absence of magnetic deviation too (as well as the rest of
Bill's excellent and remarkably complete experiment reports), it is not
incompatible with the ion refocussing water bump (sounds better than pimple)
hypothesis I posted earlier. You would not expect the
Xavier at Blaze Labs has just uploaded 2 interesting NASA files, which
give further strong evidence AGAINST the standard view of a mostly
hydrogen sun, and/or of hydrogen fusing into helium being the only
important nuclear reaction-- and which NASA has removed from public view
(for whatever
I suspect the threads are nearly 100 percent polar molecules, CO2 and/
or water. This could be checked by eliminating CO2 and water from
the air - provided a foolproof means exists for seeing the threads,
or at least determining their existence through the current
readings. If the threads
The place to start may be eliminating water...
Would the phenomenon occur on a dry cathode? That's the first thing to
elucidate. In my hypothesis, it wouldn't, as the phenomenon would be a
near-surface artifact due to the presence of the water bumps, the threads would
not really exist all the
Jed sez:
...
The news item below is typical attack by one of Big Coal's representatives
in Congress, Nick Rahall (D-WV). (You can assume that any politician from
West Virginia is a lackey of coal industry, just as it is a safe bet that
any politician from Michigan opposes efficiency and
Here is another interesting press release:
http://www.awea.org/newsroom/releases/AWEA_First_Quarter_Market_Report_2007.html
The U.S. wind energy industry is on track to install over 3,000
megawatts (MW) of wind power generating capacity nationwide in 2007 . . .
That is nameplate capacity.
On Jun 4, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
The place to start may be eliminating water...
Would the phenomenon occur on a dry cathode?
Well, you can't have a dry cathode if the air provides the water to
the needle for the molecular stream. Bill's experiments were carried
out
A post from 6 years ago ... dejas vous...
At 9:12 AM 12/24/0, Horace Heffner wrote:
Since the water molecule is an electrostatic dipole, it seems
possible,
especially in the presence of a strong electrostatic gradient, to
get a
chain of the form:
H H H H H H H H H H
Here is a detailed article in English describing the suicide of the
Japanese Ag. Minister Matsuoka, who was caught in a corruption
scandal, as I noted here:
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/may2007/2007-05-28-03.asp
They translate the name of the organization he was grifting for as
the
Nice idea, and perhaps it is still ahead of its proper time.
Now if one can arrange the vector of multiple ion jets of water vapor to
go vertically up a 400 ft cooling tower, and with a mass flow of ~1000
kg/sec, then ... got any ballpark figure on how much current can be carried?
Jones
Fission expansion graph corrected URL is:
http://www.world-nuclear.org/sym/2004/fig-htm/macf1-h.htm
- Jed
On Jun 4, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Nice idea, and perhaps it is still ahead of its proper time.
Now if one can arrange the vector of multiple ion jets of water
vapor to go vertically up a 400 ft cooling tower, and with a mass
flow of ~1000 kg/sec, then ... got any ballpark
On Jun 4, 2007, at 11:06 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The provision, Subtitle D of H.R. 2337, would:
Bar any new wind power project until new Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) rules are issued – a process likely to take years – and
require FWS certification of every turbine
Require all existing
Further support for Dewey B. Larson's Reciprocal system of physics:
http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/rs/cwkvk/sunpart1.htm
http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/rs/cwkvk/sunpart2.htm
http://www.reciprocalsystem.com/rs/cwkvk/index.htm
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL
Jed wrote..
As I said,
these places are cardboard front-operations whose only purpose is to
fleece the taxpayers and pass on fatcat contracts in big-rigging
schemes. There are also hundreds of semi-governmental organizations
staffed by ex-government officials
Howdy Jed,
Had you not
Horace Heffner wrote:
Wild speculation: by magnetically putting corkscrew kinks in the jet,
before throwing the switch, using a nearly longitudinally directed B,
and using a really big C1, it might even be possible to generate ball
lightning.
I have previously posted about the research
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:33:06 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Heavy metals, particularly iron, have been confirmed by a NASA solar
mission, squirting out of the sun in Solar Flares in amounts which are
up to 10,000 times higher than predicted. The results are evidence in
On Jun 4, 2007, at 4:13 PM, R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Jed wrote..
As I said,
these places are cardboard front-operations whose only purpose is to
fleece the taxpayers and pass on fatcat contracts in big-rigging
schemes. There are also hundreds of semi-governmental organizations
staffed by
On Jun 4, 2007, at 6:16 PM, thomas malloy wrote:
Horace's post motivated me to visit Kiril's website. H says that
he's restricting information, so he must be making progress.
Who is H?
Regards,
Horace Heffner
On Jun 4, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. wrote:
Xavier at Blaze Labs has just uploaded 2 interesting NASA files, which
give further strong evidence AGAINST the standard view of a mostly
hydrogen sun, and/or of hydrogen fusing into helium being the only
important nuclear reaction-- and
23 matches
Mail list logo
