Harry Veeder wrote:
A sound way to turn heat into electricity
http://forum.physorg.com/index.php?showtopic=15401
University of Utah physicist Orest Symko holds a match to a small heat
engine that produces a high-pitched tone by converting heat into sound.
Symko's research team is
R.C.Macaulay wrote:
Howdy Vorts,
With all the energy info rhetoric eminating out of D.C. and news
sources do you sense the public is expecting too much from the energy
industry?
What is your predicted time line for the first really serious bump
in the road ?
Richard
I'm an Aussy
On Jun 14, 2007, at 9:04 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
(e) Iran gets the
bomb, or one is used, followed by nuclear warfare,
I doubt that Iran would be that stupid. First they know as well as
anyone else
roughly what Israel has (not to mention that the US is just itching
for an
In reply to Wesley Bruce's message of Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:31:44 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
I'm an Aussy so D.C. is almost irrelevant and has been for some years
DC will likely never be irrelevant. The US still the worlds richest market, and
most powerful nation.
now. We are looking at some major
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:03:46 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
It eliminates the need for occupation.
What does this mean?
Regards,
Horace Heffner
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
The shrub is a plant.
On Jun 15, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:03:46
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
It eliminates the need for occupation.
What does this mean?
It means if you wipe out the population you don't need to occupy the
country with
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:46:31 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
On Jun 15, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:03:46
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
It eliminates the need for occupation.
What does this mean?
On Jun 15, 2007, at 12:58 AM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:46:31
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
On Jun 15, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:03:46
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
It
Far from a new idea indeed, what is new is that it is moving closer to being
a viable technology. A thermo acoustic refer has been developed and tested
in HOT undeveloped parts of the world and found to work. The device is
placed in the sun during the day and it produces ice, then it is moved
Harry,
I cut most of your posting out but left the meat. I am surprised it took so
long for this to get to vortex and I was going to post out work but thought
there may be no real interest.
This is a great device and easy to build (The Prime Mover) portion and
either solar or resistance or
On Jun 15, 2007, at 6:17 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
Yes, indeed. Grist for the philosophers. ...and I have no definitive
answer, other than to reply with the tried and true answer of 42.
As good an answer as I have thus far. I have to wonder at the
prospect of a partial existence outside the
From Horace:
Yes, indeed. Grist for the philosophers. ...and I have
no definitive answer, other than to reply with the tried
and true answer of 42.
As good an answer as I have thus far. I have to wonder at
the prospect of a partial existence outside the body though,
a part of a
Paul,
Your idea is viable if we had the ability to heterodyne down from the Thz
range with an efficiency that would make sense in recovered useable energy.
It is becoming more difficult than every to know what has been and is being
researched due to the issue of now 'We Must Sell' our research
Hi Stiffler,
On a macro scale all matter contains a sea of temperature gradients. View two 15
cent millimeter size thermistors separated by say 1 inch and you'll clear see
temperature gradients any place on Earth. Such gradients is usable energy, even
with old heat-electricity technology.
See
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?
pid=20601087sid=abR.mR3rTSuQrefer=home
Regards,
Horace Heffner
Could everyone please set their computer date? Steven Krivit's email/post has
been lurking at the top of my email list for ~ a week and will continue to stay
they until 7/4/2007, as his computer is over one month ahead! Stiffler
Scientific clock is only ~ half hour ahead of time.
Thanks,
Stiffler Scientific computer time is -3 minutes of WWVH so where are you
seeing ~ 1/2 hour???
-Original Message-
From: Paul Lowrance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 1:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:wassup wid D2 ?
Could everyone please set their
The reason I mentioned your name was because your emails are staying on top of
the list ~half hour even though emails from other people arrive after yours.
I set my computer to the live atomic clock in Denver, CO, USA.
If anyone wants to check their clocks:
All fine and good we sync when 'Bill Gates' product gets around to it from
'time-a.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov' and like I said when I read your post we
were -3 minutes of the same clock. I did a manual sync and it is now right
on the money...
-Original Message-
From: Paul Lowrance
Good. The main issue is with Steven Krivit's who's clock is ~ a month ahead.
Paul
Stiffler Scientific wrote:
All fine and good we sync when 'Bill Gates' product gets around to it from
'time-a.timefreq.bldrdoc.gov' and like I said when I read your post we
were -3 minutes of the same clock. I
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:25:03 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
It eliminates the need for occupation.
What does this mean?
It means if you wipe out the population you don't need to occupy the
country with massive amounts of troops.
If you drop enough nukes to wipe out
On Jun 15, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
And your point regarding occupation is?
I only asked what it meant, I didn't say you were wrong. I don't
disagree with
you that it would have that result. I do however disagree with the
ethics, the
legality, and with the original
On 15/6/2007 7:18 PM, Horace Heffner wrote:
My point was not about ethics at all though, merely that pursuit of
nuclear weapons capability is a *stupid* strategy for a country like
Iran.
It is unnerving and menacing, but it is no more or less stupid
than the decision of some other nation's
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:18:36 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
My point was not about ethics at all though, merely that pursuit of
nuclear weapons capability is a *stupid* strategy for a country like
Iran.
But how do you know they are pursuing nuclear weapons? All I
it was Goebbels who invented and perfected the technique of the Big Lie,
This is where one must have the nerve to LIE BIG and STICK TO IT; to deliver
colossal falsehoods without batting an eyelash. The best description in the
context of Goebbels' job of propping up the dictatorship of Hitler,
25 matches
Mail list logo
