By 93.3%:
http://cosmiclog.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/01/07/557301.aspx
Is Congress coming to their senses?
Terry
It has been suggested on another list that they were convinced by the 2006
posthumous Science
article by William Parkins mirrored by NET here:
"[Hot] Fusion Power: Will It Ever Come?"
http://www.newenergytimes.com/Inthenews/2006/SCIENCE-FusionPower.htm
Quote: "Scaling of the construction costs
Michel Jullian wrote:
I understood the sentence as referring to some pneumatic version of
regenerative braking, but
admittedly it was unclear.
Ah, that does make sense. I shouldn't have jumped to conclusions.
When the Prius came out, many newspaper reports said it "gets energy
from braking.
OrionWorks wrote:
Setting my personal conspiratorial opinions aside, why would they
remove Beaudette's book but not Ed Storms?
They deleted Beaudette and Krivit because they claim these books are
"self published." There was a long, tedious discussion of this in the
talk section. I contribute
I understood the sentence as referring to some pneumatic version of
regenerative braking, but
admittedly it was unclear.
What amazes me with this compressed air energy storage thing is that it is so
dead simple, isn't
there a catch somewhere?
Let's see how much energy they store in their 300
On Jan 11, 2008, at 7:56 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
I understood the sentence as referring to some pneumatic version of
regenerative braking, but
admittedly it was unclear.
What amazes me with this compressed air energy storage thing is
that it is so dead simple, isn't
there a catch somewh
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:56:31 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>I understood the sentence as referring to some pneumatic version of
>regenerative braking, but
>admittedly it was unclear.
>
>What amazes me with this compressed air energy storage thing is that it is so
>dead
Would it be conceivable to incorporate an alternative or additional
energy source, like a liquid nitrogen tank, the idea being to use LN
for extended trips. I think Brady was working on a LN engine. Have no
idea as to how well that project is going.
It's my understanding LN is relatively cheap to
Horace we can't be right, or the whole thing would have to be a gross scam.
This serious looking
resource here:
http://www.efcf.com/reports/E14.pdf
seems to agree reasonably with Wikipedia's 12kWh:
"At 20°C a 300 Liter tank filled with air at 300 bar carries 51 MJ of energy."
That's 51000 kW s
Your sig files are usually a political statement. Have you changed
over to Monty Python (In search of the holy grail: "Bring me a
shrubbery! Nik! Nik!") ?
Terry
> Robin van Spaandonk
>
> The shrub is a plant.
>
>
Since "green-is-in" these days, more so than ever
before, it seems that every scam artist in the
universe is trying to find his own green-niche in
order to capitalize on the situation.
But I do not think this compressed air car of Guy
Negre is necessarily one of them. Yet the numbers
speak for th
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008, at 8:51 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
Also, wouldn't a sizable macro-scale amount of mirror matter appear to
weigh less than predicted? In fact If I understand this correctly if a
sample was composed more than 50 percent (volume-wise) of mirror
matter wouldn't i
Ten years ago I tinkered together a 20 ft long replica of a Mississippi
River sternwheeler, only it runs on compressed air instead of steam. It
uses a portable air tank at 65 psi driving twin 2" bore by 6" stroke air
cylinders. When the engine driving the compressor quits, I have a range of
abou
FWIW, Al is reporting over 7 hours of continuous run of his magnetic
motor over in the Steorn forum. Replications are close to
realization.
Terry
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Wed, 9 Jan 2008 09:11:59 -0900:
Hi,
[snip]
>> This may not be a "change" in it's nature at all. It may *be* it's
>> nature.
>
>
>By change in nature I mean that free electrons and electrons in
>ordinary orbitals don't act like that. What changes their n
Terry Blanton wrote:
>FWIW, Al is reporting over 7 hours of continuous run of his magnetic
>motor over in the Steorn forum. Replications are close to
>realization.
Seven hours? As Chris Tinsley used to say, that narrows it down to two
possibilities: real, or fraud. No middle ground there. Some
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:34:27 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>I just saw Robin's explanation for the discrepancy (heat taken from ambient
>air during expansion,
>which produces cold air as is well know), it makes sense to me. It's quite
>remarkable that 9 kWh out
>of the
In reply to Michel Jullian's message of Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:34:27 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
> It would also mean that the car's range could be
>considerably reduced in very cold weather.
[snip]
Not necessarily. If the air in the tank was also compressed when the external
temperature was the just as cold
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:50:01 -0500
(GMT-05:00):
Hi,
[snip]
>Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>>FWIW, Al is reporting over 7 hours of continuous run of his magnetic
>>motor over in the Steorn forum. Replications are close to
>>realization.
>
>Seven hours? As Chris Tinsley
On Friday 11 January 2008 09:35, Michel Jullian wrote:
> It has been suggested on another list that they were convinced by the 2006
posthumous Science
> article by William Parkins mirrored by NET here:
>
> "[Hot] Fusion Power: Will It Ever Come?"
> http://www.newenergytimes.com/Inthenews/2006/SC
Does the force of a magnet 'run down' as it is used? That is, does it lose
internal alignment as a result of its countering interaction with other
magnetic bodies?
Lawry
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 9:08 PM
To: vortex-l
21 matches
Mail list logo
