http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/21171/
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
Well, I only considered the energy in the range of 1 cm. A cell phone
puts out about 100 mW peak of which you get about half with it hung in
your ear. In ten seconds, you get about half a
Howdy Nick,
You can chunk a rock and nearly hit Cedar Park Texas from the Dime Box
Saloon. Everyone wants them to have a winner. Trying to piece the facts to the
news reports make for speculation.
The best scientific info seems to come from Technology Review's comment section
like below..
I
I published a rebuttal of the Graneau excess-energy claims a letter to
the editor of Infinite Energy Magazine V12 #71 2007 (pg 4). In it, I
claim that the conclusions which I published together with the Graneaus
in Jnl. of Plamsa Physics were not logically able to be derived from the
Yes- I thought that there were others who strongly
feel that the Graneau results are overblown or
non-existent. Thanks for posting that.
BTW- George, have you seen anything of particular
interest, or even seen at all, the plethora of
Lindemann-inspired water-sparking' videos which have
turned up
Jones Beene wrote:
Yes- I thought that there were others who strongly
feel that the Graneau results are overblown or
non-existent. Thanks for posting that.
BTW- George, have you seen anything of particular
interest, or even seen at all, the plethora of
Lindemann-inspired water-sparking' videos
--- George
No, I have not seen the Lindemann stuff. I'll take a
look if you can supply me with a few (Youtube?) web
addresses.
Here is the first one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlMELbK8zDQ
This video is tedious at first, but bear with it till
he sprays water on the plug in just the
Howdy Jones,
The destructive results of cavitation resulting in propeller metal erosion
is a good indicator of a form of the phenomena described. in this link. It's
real , the U-Tube vid demonstrates a form of this. Ditto with sonofusion,
SL, etc.
The problem has always been to both recover
Generating 1 kW/m^2 of kite surface (better than solar!) in a
demonstration that will lead to laddermills.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/aug/03/renewableenergy.energy
My mindspring e-mail account is not working . . .
Maybe it is back to life.
Subject: ICCF14 Abstracts uploaded
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF14Abstracts.pdfhttp://lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF14Abstracts.pdf
Google is putting $5 million into this. If they have that kind of
money for kites they should invest in cold fusion.
I still think laddermill kites are impractical. What are they going
to use for the tether? What can stand up to 100 MW?!?
Using kites as auxiliary sails on large ships is a
Did you look at the Italian company, kitegen.com? They claim they can
do gigawatt plants.
Has any CF researcher applied for a google.org philanthropic grant?
http://google.org/projects.html
Terry
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Google is putting $5
How many airplanes need to hit a tether or kite to bring the method to
an end? How many up and down cycles will the tether survive? How many
lightening strikes on a wet tether must occur before the tether breaks?
In short, this method has no hope of being practical.
Ed
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Certainly, no less practical than a space elevator.
Terry
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Edmund Storms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many airplanes need to hit a tether or kite to bring the method to an
end? How many up and down cycles will the tether survive? How many
lightening strikes on a
Opps
I should have read ahead.
Looks like it is now working.
--- Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe it is back to life.
Subject: ICCF14 Abstracts uploaded
See:
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF14Abstracts.pdfhttp://lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF14Abstracts.pdf
Jed's mindspring e-mail account is not working, so I
am posting this for him.
http://lenr-canr.org/Collections/ICCF14Abstracts.pdf
Guess they are not minding the springs today ;-)
Jones Beene wrote:
Opps
I should have read ahead.
Looks like it is now working.
Intermittently. Thanks for posting that.
- Jed
Perhaps, however the billions saved by one space elevator are more
attractive than the few millions saved by all the kites that could be
put up without being a hazard. Besides, a space elevator stays in one
place. A lot of kites constantly moving up and down and changing
position would be a
The link provided was wrong and was not the one
intended (for the Mallove ICCF10 pdf) which is here,
and is probably on the LENR and IE sites too:
http://www.rafoeg.de/20,Dokumentenarchiv/10,Personenbezogenes_Archiv/,Mallove_Eugene/mallove1.pdf
19 matches
Mail list logo
