In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:39:17 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
>http://www.ghosttheory.com/2010/03/09/paris-car-crash-occupants-dissappeared-momentarily
>
>"This is just bizarre. I really would not think much of news like this
>one, but the fact that multiple witnesses were say
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:52:14 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>the same mass can produce. (I believe Mills once told me the upper
>limit based on his theory is ~100,000 times ordinary chemistry, but
>perhaps a hydrino-theory aficionado can verify that.)
The maximum he can th
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:09:15 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
>
>
>video of Self Runner
>(a variation of the Solid state generator)
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sicsnUq_a4
He states that it must be OU because the output voltage goes above the battery
voltage. How
- Original Message
> From: Stephen A. Lawrence
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Wed, March 17, 2010 2:58:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:add on: OU demonstrated ( with no secrets)
Even with
> the battery hooked up, it would be so easy for the guy to
measure current
> drain from the batt
- Original Message
> From: Terry Blanton
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Wed, March 17, 2010 7:40:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:add on: OU demonstrated ( with no secrets)
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Harry Veeder <
> ymailto="mailto:hlvee...@yahoo.com";
> href="mailto:hlvee...
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> OK. I am just trying to understand what circumstances a voltage
> measurement by itself would be sufficient to prove OU.
Never. Energy is measured by power expended over time. Electrical
power is voltage times current. Voltage transformat
Could those capacitors hold more energy than the battery if the battery was low
on charge at the beginning?
Harry
__
Yahoo! Canada Toolbar: Search from anywhere on the web, and bookmark your
favourite sites. Download it now
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> Well, something has to drive the circuit. The whole thing will stop
> dead otherwise. That would be like expecting a Fleischmann Pons cell
> work without first doing electrolysis.
No, it wouldn't. It would be like expecting a circuit which
produces electricity wit
On 03/17/2010 03:14 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>> So, get rid of the battery -- I mean, *really* get rid of it, disconnect
>> the wires at the battery terminals, and carry it a good distance away
>> from the experiment -- and show the capacitor still charging itself u
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
So, get rid of the battery -- I mean, *really* get rid of it, disconnect
the wires at the battery terminals, and carry it a good distance away
from the experiment -- and show the capacitor still charging itself up.
Well, something has to drive the circuit. The whole
Jed wrote:
>I assume you mean they should charge up the capacitor first, and then
attach it to the pulse generator instead of the battery. Right?
>If it stays charged for a long time, that is proof of over-unity operation.
That is correct.
In order to show overunity all external power sources m
On 03/17/2010 02:13 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> George Holz wrote:
>
>> This setup is only interesting if the 12V
>> battery is disconnected from the pulse generator.
>
> I assume you mean they should charge up the capacitor first, and then
> attach it to the pulse generator instead of the battery.
George Holz wrote:
This setup is only interesting if the 12V
battery is disconnected from the pulse generator.
I assume you mean they should charge up the capacitor first, and then
attach it to the pulse generator instead of the battery. Right?
If it stays charged for a long time, that is p
Hi fellow heretics,
This setup is only interesting if the 12V
battery is disconnected from the pulse generator.
It is quite easy to feed a surprising amount of
power through the high gate capacitance of a
power mosfet and into the connected circuit.
I have briefly fooled myself with this type of
- Original Message
> From: Stephen A. Lawrence
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Wed, March 17, 2010 1:03:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:add on: OU demonstrated ( with no secrets)
>
>
On 03/17/2010 12:26 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> Maybe he thinks it
> is obvious that the energy stored
On 03/17/2010 12:26 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> Maybe he thinks it is obvious that the energy stored in the capacitor
> has (or will?) exceed the energy stored in the battery.
>
HAH!
The battery obviously masses more than the caps. (Just look at the
relative sizes, and consider for a moment ty
Maybe he thinks it is obvious that the energy stored in the capacitor
has (or will?) exceed the energy stored in the battery.
Harry
- Original Message
> From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Wed, March 17, 2010 10:55:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:add on: OU
- Original Message
> From: Terry Blanton
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Sent: Wed, March 17, 2010 11:00:32 AM
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:OU demonstrated ( with no secrets)
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Harry Veeder <
> ymailto="mailto:hlvee...@yahoo.com";
> href="mailto:hlvee...@yahoo.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
>
>
> video of Self Runner
> (a variation of the Solid state generator)
He's like an American JL Naudin:
http://www.youtube.com/user/gotoluc#p/u
T
The demonstration is interesting.
However, Mr. Lawrence's aversion to the accuracy of events allegedly
being depicted are equally justified – especially when there just
happens to be nearby a "big power supply". As the old saying goes,
"Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice..."
I asked Mongo
On 03/17/2010 01:37 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
> Listen carefully from 5:30 to 6:00.
> He says the 12 volt battery feeds the pulse generator
> and then he points to some disconnected clips and says the battery
> is not attached. What does he mean?
>
I don't know. Frankly, the Stiffler "incident
21 matches
Mail list logo
