[Vo]:Could this be true? An article about rotating gas

2011-01-10 Thread David Jonsson
Please see what I wrote: http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.1381 David David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Robin - Just a shoot from the hip reply till I get a chance to sit down after work but I wouldn't expect a Casimir cavity to transform ALL wavelengths - the CONDUCTIVE GEOMETRY gives it a dimension (mouth of the river)to draw from, and, like a rubber sheet it draws in space-time from th

Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Jones Beene
Fran, The problem with verbalizing energy translation in Casimir cavities - is in going from "relativistic effects" to the basic heat anomaly itself (if and when there is an anomaly). IOW there is a M.O. for doing this, but you may be dropping one important detail - at least in the terminology,

Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Terry Blanton
LS = 4.372 x 10^-6 eV => x 1.602 x 10^-19 J/eV = 7.00 x 10^-25 J

RE: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Jones Beene
Thanks. Brrr... Not much heat in the Lamb shift. ... guess that's why lambs-eat-oats ... -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton Subject: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR LS = 4.372 x 10^-6 eV => x 1.602 x 10^-19 J/eV = 7.00 x 10^-25 J

Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > Thanks. Brrr... Not much heat in the Lamb shift. > > ... guess that's why lambs-eat-oats ... I was a little bored. I've been answering physics questions on answers.yahoo.com. Shepard's pie would be good now, cold or not. We have seven inch

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Jones, I was referring to HUP supplying gas atoms with motion to the same results as you imply for "Zitterbewegung". What is the difference between "Zitterbewegung" and HUP as applied to gas law? I believe gas law is a macro example of ZPE based on HUP but am totally open to cal

Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread peatbog
> Thanks. Brrr... Not much heat in the Lamb shift. > > ... guess that's why lambs-eat-oats ... > Don't lambs eat ivy (kids eat it too)? I believe it is mares and does who eat oats. > > -Original Message- > From: Terry Blanton > Subject: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR > > LS = 4.372 x 10

Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Jones Beene
Fran, Actually I think the many problems, as I understand what they (Moddel etc) have done (incorrectly) and why they have not seen thermal gain with Casimir cavities is three-fold: 1)Lack of a spillover catalyst (nickel alone is not sufficient). Spillover is required for pycno to accum

RE: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Jones Beene
Yup... just "kidding" to see who is paying attention. -Original Message- From: peatbog > Thanks. Brrr... Not much heat in the Lamb shift. > > ... guess that's why lambs-eat-oats ... > Don't lambs eat ivy (kids eat it too)? I believe it is mares and does who eat oats. > -Origin

Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Terry Blanton
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:32 PM, peatbog wrote: > Don't lambs eat ivy (kids eat it too)? Wooden shoe? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3oSyr8mHY4 T

RE: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Jones Beene
More on suspected Casimir thermal anomalies - up or down, as they relate to the subject heading. These effects, if they are real, may or may not be a "set-up" (preliminary stage) for eventual LENR, but there seems to be a direct connection, at least when the experiment is run long enough for trans

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Roarty, Francis X
Jones, I am totally onboard with reason 2 and 3 you list below. For reason 1 I had to go back to review spillover from your previous threads and have to admit it is a possibility but what would you recognize as the support structures in Arata's nano Pd or Mills skeletal catalyst?

Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
On 01/10/2011 02:01 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:32 PM, peatbog wrote: > > >> Don't lambs eat ivy (kids eat it too)? >> > Wooden shoe? > Heavens no. The stuff's poisonous, the well known but (IMO) toxic old rhyme aside (was the author trying to encourage kids

Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread mixent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 10 Jan 2011 11:08:18 -0800: Hi, [snip] >Moreover, if there is a 'dynamic Casimir effect' in the sense of an ongoing >heating effect, then it is likely that there could also be an ongoing >cooling effect, when those small changes in geometry happen. This is

Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread albedo5
NT, Ah, nothing like the glory of Atlanta in the snow. :) It's been awhile since I've seen that - probably too long. I had a lovely shepherd's pie on New Year's Eve, at a glorious little Irish pub in Arlington with my wayward son, back from Kabul for the last time, or so he claims. This journe

Re: [Vo]:More on Ni-H LENR

2011-01-10 Thread Fran Roarty
If the ‘Reifenschweiler effect’ is relativistic as I have posited then it is colder / slower from our perspective but distributed widely over the exterior of the Casimir plate boundary in a shallow resivoir (sail analogy) vs the acceleration / heating that occurs inside the cavity where this re