Re: [Vo]:what do ypu think of this within the latest wave of UFO and the History Channel show

You are once again correct Jed. I looked at the recent wave of UFO's, some look like clouds, some look like reflections off of a window, some are flairs, reentering space junk, or gas off of reentering space junk. The one I linked to appears to be fake as stated in the comments. I saw a UFO

Re: [Vo]:what do ypu think of this within the latest wave of UFO and the History Channel show

I have a low regard for the History Channel. I have seen documentaries there occasionally. When they are about a subject I know well, even one that is well documented such as the Battle of Midway, I have seen that they are filled with mistakes. They are written by people who know nothing about the

Re: [Vo]:The Krivit Videos Part 3

Joe Catania wrote: > 3kW is not negligible- one of Rossi's E-Cat's only supposedly vaporizes > 2g/s of water which takes less than 5kW. > I did not explain that correctly. 3 kW is the most the reactor could produce in the absence of any anomalous heat. It is the maximum electric power input. In

[Vo]:Rich Murray added your name to the Academia.edu directory of academics

>Hi, Rich Murray added your name to Academia.edu, the global directory of academics and graduate students. We checked your department directory, and it looks like you are an academic/graduate student. You are currently listed as an 'unknown' academic/graduate student: resolve your 'unknown' sta

Re: [Vo]:The Krivit Videos Part 3

You are misrepresenting the truth and misunderstanding. I made none of the claims you presented and they are completely irrelevant to the subject. 3kW is not negligible- one of Rossi's E-Cat's only supposedly vaporizes 2g/s of water which takes less than 5kW. Obviously the steam is not dry. Also

Re: [Vo]:The Krivit Videos Part 3

Joe Catania wrote: There certainly are facts involved namely could the boiling be caused by the heat stored in the metal, etc. of the E-Cat to last 15 minutes. Facts. H. . . . Okay then, tell us: How much metal? How hot did it get? Assume 3 kWh are stored, enough to vaporize 4.4 kg of wa

Re: [Vo]:The Krivit Videos Part 3

There certainly are facts involved namely could the boiling be caused by the heat stored in the metal, etc. of the E-Cat to last 15 minutes. The answer is a definitive yes. It is not speculation. We know enough about the E-Cat to posit this as the only significant source of heat known in a power

Re: [Vo]:The Krivit Videos Part 3

Joe Catania wrote: The facts are in. There are no facts in this discussion; only speculation. > As it stands it is a given that thermal inertia could easily explain the 15 > minute boiling. Your arguments are unsubstatiated. And your arguments would require the metal to be over a thousand

Re: [Vo]:The Krivit Videos Part 3

Here are some comments by Levi about the video and the Heat After Death event. Not terribly important, but . . . http://22passi.blogspot.com/2011/08/agosto-comincia-molto-bene.html Note that if you use Google to translate this, "Rossi" converts to "Smith." - Jed

Re: [Vo]:The Krivit Videos Part 3

The proof has nothing to do with the demonstration. I indicated this many times. The facts are in. As it stands it is a given that thermal inertia could easily explain the 15 minute boiling. Your arguments are unsubstatiated. As for my demonstration it suggests the metal can stay hot for longer

[Vo]:NI-H Generator

Hi, I am new to this list, greet you all! I had an idea to make an electrolytic device in order to make NiH thinfilms. Of course the final purpose is to get NI-H fusion or nuclear reactions. My english is not so good, but it should be obvious from the picture:

Re: [Vo]:The Krivit Videos Part 3

Joe Catania wrote: I've already prooven it. Furthermore I demonstrated it. Your demonstration employed roughly 50,000 times less water than the eCat, and nichrome metal heated to incandescence. The eCat never gets that hot. So your demonstration was so different from the December eCat test

Re: [Vo]:The Krivit Videos Part 3

I've already prooven it. Furthermore I demonstrated it. So if by unrealistic you mean realistic then we agree. Its quite obvious that the water will boil for a considerable time after the power is off. This does not require anything in addition to the normal functioning of the device. It is not

Re: [Vo]:The Krivit Videos Part 3

Joe Catania wrote: No, its not out of the question at all. Since we don't know the flow rate of water (whether its flowing or not) and since it isn't particularly relevant I neglect it. The water is always flowing. This is a flow calorimeter. It is completely unrealistic to suppose that you

Re: [Vo]:Krivit's June video interview to Sergio Focardi

On Aug 26, 2011, at 2:49 AM, Daniel Rocha wrote: Part. 2, 7 minutes. Focardi answers it is more likely that a proton reacts with the nucleus than a neutron ACCORDING TO EXPERIMENTAL DATA. Damn, you can notice that immediately Krivit changes his tone of voice, probably also his mind, and pr

Re: [Vo]:Krivit's June video interview to Sergio Focardi

Part. 2, 7 minutes. Focardi answers it is more likely that a proton reacts with the nucleus than a neutron ACCORDING TO EXPERIMENTAL DATA. Damn, you can notice that immediately Krivit changes his tone of voice, probably also his mind, and probably starts thinking that the whole thing is a scam beca

[Vo]:Krivit's June video interview to Sergio Focardi

Hello group, Here's a three-part video interview of Sergio Focardi by Steven Krivit (New Energy Times), with interpreting by Andrea Rossi: Video Interview – Focardi Discusses Andrea Rossi’s Energy Catalyzer Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmWbVH5A4gI Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v