>From the CERN paper, all the neutrinos stated out as muon neutrinos and
where received as muon neutrinos without flavor change to tau neutrinos. So
no flavor changing occurred.
The speed of the muon neutrinos was not a function of their energy either.
These results rule out the MSW effect as a
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> Yeah. Bien sur. The whole issue isn't that some
> religious law might be broken; it's that you can get
> contradictions if we allow stuff like this to go on without
> careful controls on it, and short cuts, improbability
> physics, and bistrom
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Jouni,
I am not certain I follow quite what you're suggesting. Are you suggesting
that, possibly, the absolute frame of reference may have differing velocities
based on the velocity of the local object? I.E, some planet, Earth or Venus,
whatever?
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> From: Stephen A. Lawrence
> I believe I alluded to something like this earlier.
In reading back over previous emails, yes, you're right.
>
> In a universe which adheres in general to the SR model, you
> can, none the less, allow instantaneous
" but the big thing at the moment is, it seems to me, can it transfer
information faster than light in free space."
No, only in dense matter, not free space...
Best regards,
Axil
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Kyle Mcallister
wrote:
> --- On Sat, 9/24/11, Horace Heffner wrote:
>
>
> > In th
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Horace Heffner wrote:
> In the CERN OPERA results, neutrinos arrived about
> 2.48x10^-5 the travel time sooner than expected. For a
> 168,000 ly trip the expected photon arrival delay time Dt
> should be
>
> Dt = (2.48x10^-5)*(168,000 yr) = 1521
> days = 4.17 years
Righ
The Mikheyev–Smirnov–Wolfenstein effect (often referred to as the matter
effect) is a particle physics process which can act to modify neutrino
oscillations in matter. The work by American physicist Lincoln Wolfenstein
in 1978 and the work by Soviet physicists Stanislav Mikheyev and Alexei
Smirnov
On 09/24/2011 11:04 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
The New Scientist article, "Dimension-hop may allow neutrinos to
cheat light speed", here:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957-dimensionhop-may-allow-
neutrinos-to-cheat-light-speed.html
suggest dimension hops as the means for neutrinos trav
Horace,
thanks for your reply.
Your frustration about the incompleteness of the E&K travel report is
understandable, but by questioning everything that was or was not measured or
reported, and by generating a lot of new uncertainties you certainly do not
help those who seek to converge to possi
rom the experiment done back in 2008 as discussed in this article, quantum
information can travel at speeds that exceed 100,000 times C (the speed of
light in a vacuum).
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080813/full/news.2008.1038.html
The concept of time may not necessary apply to quantum particle
First, you hit a sore point here, and I'm going to address it first.
The sore point is people giving some special, unusual meaning to a
common word, and then pretending that they've done something more clever
than just introduce a monkey wrench into the discussion.
On 11-09-23 07:32 PM, Mauro
And by the way...
On 11-09-24 01:58 AM, Kyle Mcallister wrote:
Now, the article goes on to say that maybe the neutrinos did some funny travel through
another dimension, and arrived at the destination sooner by taking a shortcut. So, no, they
never really traveled faster than light. This is qui
2011/9/24 Kyle Mcallister :
> If an assumed absolute frame is present, these do not happen, you simply
> arrive quicker,
> but the speed in different directions is varied. It would be, I think, an
> interesting
> experiment, if possible, to measure the speed of these (if they are)
> superluminal
On 11-09-24 01:58 AM, Kyle Mcallister wrote:
[ ... ]
It should be pointed out that there are formulations of relativistic transforms
(Tangherlini, Selleri, etc.) which allow some form of absolute reference frame,
and therefore absolute simultaneity. There is a distinct 'past' and 'future'.
T
THAT is astounding. There has been slow progress toward mind-reading
machines and machines that can be controlled by the mind. This looks like a
large leap. Kind of like that Google self-driving car versus earlier
attempts to make antonymous cars.
- Jed
Mark,
Thane posted this reponse to my comments:
"Dear hveeder, Actually if you want to use a gasoline engine analogy (as coined
by one of our engineer investors...) "the vehicle would be accelerating while
the gas tank is filling up with fuel and eventually you would have to stop at
the side of
Kyle,
Enjoyed your rant! Thx.
RE: the 'god' particle being really hard to find...
Makes me wonder if the (unconscious?) motivation for its existence came out
of a realization by the physics powerbrokers that they needed a reason to
justify an even larger research budget. "Let's hypothesize a new
The technology takes an fMRI (fMRI ???) setup, a supercomputer, and a
subject willing to undergo hours of pre-training, but still ... pretty
amazing!
http://techland.time.com/2011/09/23/scientists-can-almost-read-your-mind-tur
n-thoughts-into-movies/
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks
On Sep 24, 2011, at 1:08 AM, Peter Heckert wrote:
Years ago there was a theory of Professor Günter Nimtz at
university Kölln Germany.
He had the theory (basing on experimental data) that Light has
infinite speed inside Tunnel Effect regions.
He made measurements and presented an Experiment w
On Sep 24, 2011, at 5:13 AM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Horace, I was going to forward your message to another forum and put
reference to mail-archive, but again your message did not make it into
the archive.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/
Perhaps, you should try http://goo.gl in
The New Scientist article, "Dimension-hop may allow neutrinos to
cheat light speed", here:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20957-dimensionhop-may-allow-
neutrinos-to-cheat-light-speed.html
suggest dimension hops as the means for neutrinos traveling faster
than light, as measured in t
A slight correction to the Dt calc made below.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 9:58 PM, Kyle Mcallister wrote:
--- On Fri, 9/23/11, Horace Heffner wrote:
This measurement conflicts with early arrival time data for
neutrinos from supernova. The New Scientist article quotes
Marc Sher of the College of Wi
On Sep 23, 2011, at 9:58 PM, Kyle Mcallister wrote:
--- On Fri, 9/23/11, Horace Heffner wrote:
This measurement conflicts with early arrival time data for
neutrinos from supernova. The New Scientist article quotes
Marc Sher of the College of William and Mary in
Williamsburg, Virginia, "It's
Horace, I was going to forward your message to another forum and put
reference to mail-archive, but again your message did not make it into
the archive.
http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/
Perhaps, you should try http://goo.gl instead of tinyurl.com
–Jouni
2011/9/24 Horace Hef
Years ago there was a theory of Professor Günter Nimtz at university
Kölln Germany.
He had the theory (basing on experimental data) that Light has infinite
speed inside Tunnel Effect regions.
He made measurements and presented an Experiment where a Mozart Symphony
was transmitted over short dist
25 matches
Mail list logo