- Original Nachricht
Von: Colin Hercus colinher...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 25.10.2011 03:54
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Possible mechanism-Excess Power Reading of ECAT
Hi Peter,
The primary flow is interesting problem. Rossi states 4g/sec which is close
to 15
Hi Peter,
I know Rossi said this but I also know Mats measured a lower rate (0.9g/m)
for a period of 6 minutes and I also know they stated the flow rate was
increased at 19:08 to cool the reaction but if the pump was already at
maximum how could this be done?
It's perplexing to have all this
He doesnt care about precision or truth. He always gives the most advantageous
answer when he thinks people will believe this or people cant check this.
Thats not important for him and he dosnt care much, because this changes
nothing for him.
I do wait for the outcome of the 1MW experiment. 1
Mats Lewan said that the pump was calibrated before the test and the flow
rate was about 13 kg/h. This was not against pressure and as we know from
previous tests, flow rate will decrease when pressure is increasing.
—Jouni
When its a peristaltic pump the rate should depend on primary pressure.
Rossi has the water container below the pump and this creates subpressure and
should reduce the rate.
The secondary pressure should not influence the rate too much, as long as the
hose doesnt leak, because all water that was
Greetings Vortex,
My only claim to fame was that, I used to attend Temple University Frontier
Sciences with the late
Dr Gene Mallove, a good friend. According to Gene, he left MIT and formed
Infinite Energy when
he discovered that MIT researchers were cooking the books against Cold
Fusion.
I
Greetings Vortex,
I am not sure IF the website for E-Cat patent was ever mentioned here:
http://ecatpatent.com/
Ron Kita, Chiralex
About the promised videos I think is not a big deal to hire a bounch of fine
dressed guys, smiling and shacking hands after the big success of the
demonstration.
Somebody, passing nearby of his showroom have spotted some worker (super
mario bros ?) quite busy probably staging the
From Mr. Murray,
…notable for 22 years is that not a single lab can
replicate their own research to reliably demonstrate
an anomaly
This means cloning and in vitro fertilization must be quack science as well.
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
www.zazzle.com/orionworks
Colin Hercus colinher...@gmail.com wrote:
I know Rossi said this but I also know Mats measured a lower rate (0.9g/m)
for a period of 6 minutes . . .
Here is a note I wrote about that in another forum:
As far as I know the flow rate was 15 L per hour. That is what Rossi said,
and it seems to
Andrea Rossi
October 25th, 2011 at 3:58 AM
Dear R. Breathnach:
We do not use radioactive materials, do not leave radioactive material
and the highes temperature we can reach is the melting point of nickel
: once the nickel melts, the E-Cat stops and this fact makes it
intrinsecally safe.
Warm
Andrea Rossi said to reporters:
We do not use radioactive materials, do not leave radioactive material and
the highes temperature we can reach is the melting point of nickel : once
the nickel melts, the E-Cat stops and this fact makes it intrinsecally safe.
In two follow-up questions,
At 06:54 PM 10/24/2011, Colin Hercus wrote:
The primary flow is interesting problem. Rossi states 4g/sec which
is close to 15 kg/h. The specs of the pump give a maximum of 12kg/h
at 1.5 bar so if we believe Rossi then the pump must have been
running at maximum volume but then how can we
There has been a rumor floated that the US Navy is Rossi’s customer in this
week’s upcoming E-Cat trial. This rumor is entirely believable.
With the fragmentary background that Rossi has let slip during the last year
regarding US government knowledge and participation in the development of
the
The answer is clear if you look at his most recent failure. He came up with a
device for doing thermoelectric conversion(waste heat to electricity) at a much
better efficiency thanwas available. Even though it was verified by
outsiders, it turned out to beimpossible to scale up to
Wouldn't US Navy have clear grounds to test nuclear devices on US soil?
Why would they test the device in Italy?
It seems that they didnt't went thru with US-soil-based test because
nuclear-device testing in the US is forbidden for private entities.
I ask myself if that's the case for the US
Somewhat off-topic, but this is handy:
http://www.google.com/publicdata/explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_met_y=sp_pop_totltdim=truedl=enhl=enq=world+population
Select individual nations on the left. In the box marked Population select
growth rate, fertility, and things like GDP.
Hold the cursor on the
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There has been a rumor floated that the US Navy is Rossi’s customer in this
week’s upcoming E-Cat trial. This rumor is entirely believable.
I have no idea whether this is true or not, but I note that Rossi is firmly
opposed to selling his devices to any
Right, between the military interst and NRC regulators, it will be 10-15 years
before any of this tech is available for commercial use.
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 12:26 PM
Subject: [Vo]:Rossi’s customer
There has been
Jay Caplan uniqueprodu...@comcast.net
mailto:uniqueprodu...@comcast.net wrote:
Right, between the military interst and NRC regulators, it will be
10-15 years before any of this tech is available for commercial use.
Why do you say that military use of technology slows down civilian
I recognize that if the US government gets control of E-Cat development that
will be bad for the cold fusion community because the government will lock
down the technology consistent with other nuclear technologies.
Jed will naturally fear this turn of events.
But consider that Rossi has
That would make sense due to the excellent LENR research done by the Navy's
SPAWAR facility in San Diego. I'm sure a number of high-ranking Navy
officers (decision makers) are well aware of SPAWAR's work.
Perhaps the 'agreement' states that the technology would be used strictly
(yeah, right)
I expect the EU has similar fair trade laws so I do not think Defkalion will
be able to enforce this policy. I think it makes them look stupid even
mentioning it. Who are they kidding? I suppose they are trying to kid Rossi,
or at least humoring him.
I'm not sure that we do. I don't
Military might want an exclusive interest in a cheap small heat source for a
number of strategic interests including ships, but, at any rate, the NRC and
other country equivalents will hold this back for a decade+ of testing and
proof of safety before allowing marketing. It's nuclear, remember.
Okay, Lewan told me that after the run there was at least 20 L of hot water
left in the vessel. He did not measure it the way he did after the September
test, but the vessel was pretty full.
If there was any water let in the vessel that proves there must have been
some cooling water flowing into
Jay Caplan uniqueprodu...@comcast.net wrote:
**
Military might want an exclusive interest in a cheap small heat source for
a number of strategic interests including ships . .
They might want exclusive use, but they cannot get it. Too much information
about this has already circulated. It is
The Precariat – The new dangerous class
http://www.policy-network.net/articles/4004/-The-Precariat-%E2%80%93-The-new-dangerous-class
For the first time in history, the mainstream left has no progressive
agenda. It has forgotten a basic principle. Every progressive
political movement has been
See:
http://amarillo.com/opinion/editorial/2011-10-25/big-dog-gone-arsenal-still-bites#.TqdaLpsUqso
A 9 Mt bomb. Wikipedia says they built 340 of the darn things. Thank
goodness we are rid of them!
- Jed
Nothing about us, without us!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_UjZyjFMUC8
water...education..air...free energy...
Harry
It's not scientific, but I've been digging into the people listed as
attending
the Ross ECat demo on October 6th. Most of these are familiar names, but a
few names pulled from a focus.it posting are less familiar. ? marks
identifications I think are correct, but may not be. ?? is more speculative.
I just read The Coming Population Crash by Fred Pearce. It is quite a
surprise that all developed countries are ( China and India following soon)
loosing population. I grew up reading the Population Bomb that was to have
exploded in 1990.
3d world countries and countries that deny woman
fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
I just read The Coming Population Crash by Fred Pearce. It is quite
a surprise that all developed countries are ( China and India following
soon) loosing population.
They are not losing population yet. Look at the stats carefully. China is
still gaining at 0.5% per
fly forever into vast deep distance of Hubble Ultra Field 10,000
galaxies in accurate 4:17 minute video 2009.08.12: Rich Murray
2011.10.24
Hubble Ultra Deep Field in 3-D
by NANCY ATKINSON on AUGUST 12, 2009
Here’s a new way to appreciate the Hubble Ultra Deep Field image, by
flying through the
33 matches
Mail list logo
