Re: [Vo]:Correspondence about the rejected paper

Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote: Lindley is the second dumbest person associated with cold fusion. The late Nate Hoffman was the stupidest, in my opinion. Yeah, Jed, we discussed the late Nate when we first started corresponding. I very much disagree with you about Mr.

[Vo]:Progress: Hardware Peer Pressure is ready

Hi Group, Just wanted to update you on my plans to replicate cold fusion claims, see http://www.fusioncatalyst.org/2012/04/peer-pressure/ Cheers, Bastiaan.

Re: [Vo]:Correspondence about the rejected paper

That was a juicy read, Jed. FWIW, I know someone who's employed at the National Science Foundation. He's an old Science Fiction fan/friend we've known for decades. He reviews funding grant proposals for promising new science projects. It's a position that wields a lot of responsibility and power.

Re: [Vo]:Progress: Hardware Peer Pressure is ready

Spelling error in blog bussy = busy Who knows what Rossi is busy doing. I think there was plenty of good evidence revealed after EK. Actually, I did not think much of their report. - Jed

[Vo]:The efficiency of the Silex isotope separation method

Hi Assume you could get absorption of a laser photon in unranium hexaflouride based on uranium 235 and not in 238. I can not imagine what I read in newspapers since the optical excitation would be almost the same. Rotational and vibrational spectrum however would differ by approximately 1% or

[Vo]:Nich Energy Results (Piantelli Group)

I've listened to a little of it so far (Valerio Ciampoli of NichEnergy on behalf of Piantelli at University of Sienna) they are getting very good results and releasing some excellent data. Most of the slides have been seen before, but good to have a commentary for it.

Re: [Vo]:Correspondence about the rejected paper

Regarding Abd's comment that Hoffman . . . made some mistakes, no question about that, but there is nobody on the planet who has not done that. There are forgivable mistakes, and there are huge mistakes that no one should make. Suppose Hoffman had written a throwaway sentence or footnote in his

[Vo]:ZPE, DCE, Ni-H, RTS, DLP and other important three-letter words.

Zero Point Energy, aka ZPE - pervades every corner of the universe. It may play a role in Nickel hydrogen reactions - NiH, in the guise of DCE, or the Dynamical Casimir Effect. Yet there is still entrenched doubt in the mainstream that ZPE is really usable in the real world. A recent experiment,

Re: [Vo]:ZPE, DCE, Ni-H, RTS, DLP and other important three-letter words.

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote: Would you-know-who (the original 3-letter word) be pleased? HEP? DLH? PAMD? Wait, no, that's four. TJB! (moi) T

[Vo]:about the state of LENR

  This is a personal assessment of the issue, and basically nothing new. So you just can skip that, without loosing anything.   LENR -for me- is easily the most challenging issue I encountered in my lifetime.   Blacklight Power, Nanospire, Brillouin, Rossi, Defkalion, the Academics.   There may be

Re: [Vo]:Correspondence about the rejected paper

OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote: Based on conversations I've had with him over the years, not in a million trillion gillion years would I EVER expect him to, on his own reconnaissance, give a single proposal related to a CF project the light of the day. Such

RE: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:ZPE, DCE, Ni-H, RTS, DLP and other important three-letter words.

GOD -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 4:42 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:ZPE, DCE, Ni-H, RTS, DLP and other important three-letter words. On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net