On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 2:00 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
This big string also appears somewhere in our random
string, hence our random string is a perfect ToE.
This is the assumption I'm querying. I'm not saying it's incorrect, I'm
just wondering whether it's certain that it is
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 12:06 PM, John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
I have not seen the video,
You should.
Yes -- I should have watched it first. It does not look like parallax. It
looks like a hoax.
Eric
Based upon the size of the crater we should go dig it up then and erase
our national debt
On Saturday, February 23, 2013, David Roberson wrote:
I visited it once and the story is that the meteorite came in at a steep
angle and is buried under one of the rims.
Dave
-Original
It is not sustainable. All is based on taxes and subsidies, and on false
price not taking the reality of variable demand across the day. backup
thermal energy is not paid at real price.
The LENR CHP will reduce the consumption and bill of home, bill which
already hard to accept in germany
I believe it was an iron meteorite. The value of one of these items is
proportional to what someone else is willing to pay for it. I have a strong
suspicion that the amount of money you could get for it would be a lot less
than you believe. Remember supply and demand? Too much supply of
Interesting article on a simple worm parasite that lives to be very old,
comparatively. Probably this is the human equivalent of Methuselah, but not
as a myth, or a fiction like your Third Eye, Nick Danger. :-)
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/02/130222143142.htm
As a senior citizen
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Mark Goldes mgol...@chavaenergy.com wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/23/star-shaped-gravity-waves-physicists-france_n_2744664.html?ir=Science
quote:
It is generally accepted that the shape of the waves depends on the
container shape, said researcher
I agree this is interesting behavior. I have a suspicion that the shapes that
emerge do so because of a very high Q resonance at the particular frequencies
that the final waveform is composed of. Trying to figure out which frequencies
will have that characteristic would be the difficult part.
Found a preprint of the paper!
http://www.unice.fr/rajchenbach/starPRL.pdf
It has one set of pictures showing a similiar pattern in both a
circular container and a square container.
Harry
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:53 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I agree this is interesting
Let's start from a different viewpoint. I would like to find out from
Tom and other people whether their approach can be applied to my
approach. I'm trying to explain what is common to all approaches,
which might be combined, and where they are different and might need
to be modified.
I
Harry,
Thanks for that link. What is interesting to me, as I have curiously
plowed thru hundreds of crop circle images to get a feel for them, some
of those gravity waves and interference patterns tend to also show up in
the fields. A very good visual site for those interested in browsing the
The other day I hypothesized that the density of the NAE along the surface of
the active metal should be an important factor related to the magnitude of a
nuclear reaction once initiated. The reason I suggested was because of the
fact that any energy released by the reactions taking place must
http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1190/of2005-1190.pdf
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 9:54 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I believe it was an iron meteorite. The value of one of these items is
proportional to what someone else is willing to pay for it. I have a
strong suspicion that the
I my view, heat and/or the application of pulsed electric current are/is
an indispensable ingredient in the LENR reaction. Do you agree?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
Let's start from a different viewpoint. I would like to find out from Tom
and
Dave,
I believe it was a chondrite:
http://cen.acs.org/articles/91/i8/Russian-Meteor-Chondrite.html
Like my usual, I was joking a bit about the overall price, I agree on your
economics.
What is more interesting to me is to see how much of this object they
actually retrieve.
Life would be
Thermal imaging of NAE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb9V_qFKf2Mfeature=player_embedded
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:43 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The other day I hypothesized that the density of the NAE along the surface
of the active metal should be an important factor
That is great evidence in favor. Thanks Axil.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 1:10 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Craters and NAE
Thermal imaging of NAE
I had a suspicion that you were joking about that.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 12:58 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:rather big fragment of the Chelyabinsk is discovered (fwd)
Dave,
I believe it was a
On Feb 24, 2013, at 10:51 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
I my view, heat and/or the application of pulsed electric current
are/is an indispensable ingredient in the LENR reaction. Do you agree?
You ask several questions at the same time. The LENR process requires
energy to overcome a slight
Heat interacts with the lattice at the sites of lattice imperfections to
activate the NAE. This is the exciton: a bound state of an electron and
hole which are attracted to each other by the electrostatic Coulomb force.
It is an electrically neutral quasiparticle.
A plasmon is a quantum of plasma
In reply to Edmund Storms's message of Sun, 24 Feb 2013 11:26:37 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
You ask several questions at the same time. The LENR process requires
energy to overcome a slight energy barrier present within the overall
process. Consequently, it has a positive temperature effect. In other
Yeah what else is he joking about?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:14 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I had a suspicion that you were joking about that.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 24,
The spectroscopic anomalies that have here to for been cited as proof of
the existence of Hydrinos could well originate from collections of
electrons stored in artificial atoms formed in nano-cavities subject to
Fano resonant spectral modifications at high electron loading.
See
Love you too man
On Sunday, February 24, 2013, James Bowery wrote:
Yeah what else is he joking about?
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:14 PM, David Roberson
dlrober...@aol.comjavascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'dlrober...@aol.com');
wrote:
I had a suspicion that you were joking about that.
Dave
Yes Robin, hydrinos are a possible feature in the LENR process.
Several people have proposed this idea using a different justification
than Mills gives. However, this is not the only feature in the process
that needs energy to occur. At the present time, the understanding has
to focus on
This may be of interest...
http://www.spacemart.com/reports/Thats_the_way_the_droplets_adhere_999.html
Mark Goldes
Co-Founder, Chava Energy
CEO, Aesop Institute
www.chavaenergy.com
www.aesopinstitute.org
707 861-9070
707 497-3551 fax
The rules of the game
*No idea can be accepted if it violates basic chemical rules no matter how
much QM is applied or how complex the mathematical justification.*
Is QM considered a chemical rule?
I found a reference that purports to prove hydrinos are incompatible with
quantum mechanics.
Axil, QM is only a tool. It is not a law. It is a tool used to
describe behavior. Yes, many aspects of chemistry can be described
using QM. On the other hand, the concept that energy states have a
characteristic energy, i.e. quanta, is a law of nature.
The hydrino is a concept put forth
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
...No matter which kind of structure is proposed, its formation MUST
follow known and accepted chemical rules because this is initially a normal
chemical structure that forms within a normal chemical structure. No idea
On Feb 24, 2013, at 1:59 PM, James Bowery wrote:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
...No matter which kind of structure is proposed, its formation MUST
follow known and accepted chemical rules because this is initially a
normal chemical structure
You have oftentimes citied imagination as unproductive in the formulation
of theory.
I might rightfully apply the method that Mills uses to interpret the
experimental basis of the hydrino theory as imagination.
QM says it’s impossible to know what those electrons are actually doing to
produce
On Feb 24, 2013, at 2:09 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
You have oftentimes citied imagination as unproductive in the
formulation of theory.
To be clear, I said use of ONLY imagination is a waste of time. A
theory has be be related to reality - imagination does not.
Nevertheless, theory very
Robin,
The net energy released by a single fusion reaction is measured in the MeV, not
eV. That is why I believe that there is a mutual interaction between
individual NAE. The local heat energy release is large and can not escape the
area except through diffusion which is a slow process
Dave, what behavior of LENR can only be explained by proposing
coupling between the NAE sites? Of course, coupling is expected based
on local temperature and a photon flux. What more do you propose?
Ed
On Feb 24, 2013, at 2:26 PM, David Roberson wrote:
Robin,
The net energy released by a
Recapitulating your famous quote as follows”
“Many explanations have been proposed that are based on imagined ways
energy could accumulate in sufficient amount in the chemical lattice to
overcome the Coulomb barrier, either directly or as result of neutron
formation. These processes also
Ed, I have been looking at the craters that have formed upon the surface of
some of the earlier active experiments. Also, Axil supplied a fine link that
demonstrated hot spots being formed upon the surface of another system. I can
run down the picture reference if you wish, but I suspect that
On Feb 24, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Recapitulating your famous quote as follows”
“Many explanations have been proposed that are based on imagined
ways energy could accumulate in sufficient amount in the chemical
lattice to overcome the Coulomb barrier, either directly or as
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
the other is that EU make a regulation to forbid LENR, but when big energy
master LENR, they will obtain the monopoly to exploit LENR, keep the price,
keep the grid, and waste most of LENR added value in useless safety
On Feb 24, 2013, at 3:06 PM, David Roberson wrote:
Ed, I have been looking at the craters that have formed upon the
surface of some of the earlier active experiments. Also, Axil
supplied a fine link that demonstrated hot spots being formed upon
the surface of another system. I can run
OK, I think I understand what you are describing after your detailed
explanation. Correct me if I am wrong, but it appears as though you are
assuming that a random collection of individual events is leading to the crater
formation and hot spots. This is a possible cause and might indeed be
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Paul Breed p...@rasdoc.com wrote:
I realize that I've shown up here as a newbe and immediately gored the
sacred cows and questioned the answers of some of the most respected
longest contributing members on this list. I do so with great respect
for your
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:37 PM, Paul Breed p...@rasdoc.com wrote:
(As others have pointed out one needs to be above the curie temperature of
the material being tested.)
Don't take this assertion too much to heart. I have doubts about it's
general applicability. On this list we like to
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
***I do not understand why this isn't being investigated more thoroughly.
It's not as if you've proposed some new physics.
I think it is new physics, and that Jones will agree with this statement.
He's proposing that
Hi! Please excuse errors. English is not my native language.
If we
want to make better LENR and find a start for a theory so may it bee
good to leave out the nuclear physics for a moment.
If cracks is the
site for NAE it would be good to see watt have been done about micro
cracks in metals.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
In addition, the behavior of helium and tritium show that they are made
very near the surface and not in the bulk. These issues have been well
discussed.
To elaborate, the conclusion that Pd/D LENR is a surface effect
I wrote:
2. There have been several high-profile Pd/D experiments that have proposed
a correlation of 4He off-gas production on the order of the heat observed
-- somewhere near 24 MeV per palladium atom, although the precise value is
in dispute.
Correction -- the value (which is disputed)
46 matches
Mail list logo
