The discussion was predicated on this reaction as follows:
Si28 + O16 -> Ca40 + He4 + 6.2 MeV
Now you are changing the playing field to U236 fission. Let us continue to
talk about the fusion of highly stable elements.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 3:35 AM, wrote:
> In reply to Axil Axil's message
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 4 Jul 2013 16:17:29 -0400:
Hi Axil,
[snip]
>This particle could well be a magnetic vortex current that is mobile well
>beyond its location of creation. Like a nano-sized ball lightning, this
>vortex current is attracted to a solid surface where it induces
Jones Beene wrote:
> … “spewing” may not be accurate, if you mean that a solid or a liquid is
> carelessly released. Their reactors were sealed and pressurized, so that if
> anything was released, a slow leak of a radioactive gas (radon, tritium or
> xenon) is the best candidate. . . .
>
I do n
From: Jed Rothwell
As noted here, those people died of cancer at a fairly young age. I cannot
judge, but I got the impression their techniques and measurements were
crude. That is also what others said. McKubre told me they scared the hell
out of him. He thought they were "reducing" radioac
Jones Beene wrote:
> The connection is that both use electrochemistry (and LENR techniques) to
> create nuclear reactions which secondarily transmute heavy metals. Here is
> an old IE article on the CGC
>
> http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/IE13-14CincinattiGroup.pdf
As noted here, th
From: Peter Gluck
Dear Jones
How is connected GENIE with the Cincy Cell- in your opinion?
The connection is that both use electrochemistry (and LENR techniques) to
create nuclear reactions which secondarily transmute heavy metals. Here is
an old IE
Eric Walker wrote:
> Can I just say how cool it is that someone can point to a blog post in
> Italian, and the non-Italian speakers can go read a decent automatic
> translation of it without skipping a beat, as though they were reading a
> post written in English?
>
Well, the quality not that g
David Roberson wrote:
> This would be great news if proven accurate.
>
And no news at all if it is inaccurate!
> I would rather see the 20 watts of excess heat being generated with an
> input of less than 20 watts to prove that the thing has a good beginning
> COP before stability issues a
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:43:21 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>What causes the defeat of coulomb barrier?
>
>
>
>
>
>Mixent - kinetic energy of nuclear collision.
>
>
>
>
>
>Axil EMF- namely charge concentration and anapole magnetism.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>The defeat of the coulomb ba
9 matches
Mail list logo