Yiannis has considered seriously LENR (not more genuine
Cold Fusion) for the first time in 2009 and has rejected many of our
most valuable memes. Young expert is an oxymoron. He also has
shown lack of respect for our tradition to build delicate, weak,
unmanageable evanescent, almost non-cognoscible
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
A laptop nowadays draws 50 to 100 W. I assume future ones will draw ~25 W.
> Imagine a small but intense 50 W heat source powering a thermoelectric
> chip, with a large radiator behind that to spread out the heat. That would
> be doable I think
> From: "David Roberson"
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 6:07:50 PM
> One observation I recall from the video was that they tended to keep
> the camera focused upon the multiple temperature readings most of
> the time and spent little time on the output temperature and flow
> rate indication. Th
*The evanescent wave*
There is an EMF power amplification factor of up to 10 to the 15 power
experimentally demonstrated by nanolenzes formed by nanowires and
nanoparticles.
This is before the chemical probes that measure this power level are
destroyed by the EMF originating from the “hot spot".
Thanks again. It appears like DGT actually had 20 plus kilowatts of power
being delivered according to the information thus far. Does anyone recall
seeing evidence of a magic trick of some type regarding the output vapor?
One observation I recall from the video was that they tended to keep th
David Roberson wrote:
I suspect that the lower power products that are mentioned, such as a
> laptop computer will still need connection to a power generation source
> that is external. The electrical power they need requires the release of
> far too much low quality heat for its local generatio
There's a full calculator here :
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/steam-pressure-drop-calculator-d_1093.html
I don't have the steam density at hand (and have to go do some errands).
> From: "David Roberson"
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 4:33:03 PM
> Thanks for the good information. When the drop was calculated as .5
> bars, was that assuming dry steam at 165 C?
I think the peak was 165C -- I may have used 14C in some of my calculations
> Also, if the temperature measur
*but we don't accept Yiannis as expert on cold fusion theory,*
Mark Twain defined an expert as "an ordinary fellow from another town" Will
Rogers described an expert as "A man fifty miles from home with a
briefcase." Danish scientist and Nobel laureate Niels Bohr defined an
expert as "A person tha
Thanks for the good information. When the drop was calculated as .5 bars, was
that assuming dry steam at 165 C? Also, if the temperature measures 165 C at
the output test point, does that automatically result in dry superheated steam?
I ask this question because there most likely will exist a
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher
> PG: International Journal of Modern Chemistry, 2013, 5(1): 29-43
AF: I had a bad feeling when I read this; "Peer-reviewed journal." The journal
is an
on-line publication. Authors pay to have their papers published
So true. This is as far
note that if I understood well, the end of the output pipe was plunged into
a flow of water to cool the steam .
the result is a great aspiration which cancel the pressure of vaporisation.
if it is so, the result would be steam produced and aspired quickly into
the "sinkhole"
how much volume is .5
> From: "Peter Gluck"
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 12:08:01 AM
>
> Dear Readers,
>
>
> Yiannis Hadjichristos has just called my attention to the following
> paper, a real double rara avis:
> - it is published in a peer reviewed journal;
> - it clearly opts for a multi-stage theory, interdisc
> From: "David Roberson"
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2013 2:39:12 PM
This is a quick response .. I don't have time right now to dig up my old posts.
See my document on steam at lenr.qumbu.com for steam quality.
>
> I have seen various tubing sizes tossed around in regard to the
> recent video d
I have seen various tubing sizes tossed around in regard to the recent video
demonstration. Does anyone have direct knowledge of the inside diameter of the
copper cooling tubing?
Since .5 liters per minute of cooling water flow was demonstrated in the Argon
test, let's assume that this flow r
Of course, but I was responding to your, technically correct but,
misleading statement "Even early into a cold fusion era there will be few
uses for a megawatt generator."
Its true that the there will be few such uses even early on, but one of
those few will be very big early into the cold fusion
I suspect that the lower power products that are mentioned, such as a laptop
computer will still need connection to a power generation source that is
external. The electrical power they need requires the release of far too much
low quality heat for its local generation. My laptop burns a hole
I suspect that you are correct in asserting that LENR will eventually result in
the smashing of coal and oil, etc. The main question is a matter of time.
Decades might pass before the task is completed. The near future may be
educational as we observe the manner in which those industries fi
A megawatt is not a lot of Horse Power.
I would suspect that laboratory levels of LENR power could be as much as
several thousand watts without too much difficulty in handling the excess heat.
The recent DGT demonstration seemed to be within a reasonable output range.
Locating the nuclear a
Axil Axil wrote:
So users of big process power from high grade heat are steel mills, cement
> plants, glass plants, petrochemical refiners, cargo ship, train engines,
> earth movers, aircraft, trucks, autos, water desalination, buses, pumps,
> mines...
>
Most process heat will come directly from
James Bowery wrote:
> Drop-in replacements for coal-burners in electrical power plants looks
> like a quick win if the ECat-HT can be made self-sustaining via acting
> cooling control.
>
For a few decades perhaps, but after that the power companies will be going
out of business. They will not b
So users of big process power from high grade heat are steel mills, cement
plants, glass plants, petrochemical refiners, cargo ship, train engines,
earth movers, aircraft, trucks, autos, water desalination, buses, pumps,
mines...
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 2:58 PM, James Bowery wrote:
>
>
>
> On F
Seems a paper was written about stadium waves in 2002
http://angel.elte.hu/wave/download/article/MexWave.pdf
Harry
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 6:21 PM, wrote:
> In reply to H Veeder's message of Fri, 9 Aug 2013 11:32:37 -0400:
> Hi,
> [snip]
> >what determines the speed of this wave?
> >
> >http:
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Peter Gluck wrote:
>
>
>> Megawatts are better than kilowatts and kilowatts are better than
>> milliwatts.
>>
>
> Probably not in the long term. Most devices use ~100 W. In the future I
> expect all power supplies to be self-contained, with
I doubt 100W will heat your grand-grandson's house or
drive4 the aircon but if you know it better... The Cold Fusion promise was
for unlimited energy.
Please teach me how to interpret he last sentence of the paper.
Peter
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Peter Gluck wrote
Peter Gluck wrote:
> Megawatts are better than kilowatts and kilowatts are better than
> milliwatts.
>
Probably not in the long term. Most devices use ~100 W. In the future I
expect all power supplies to be self-contained, with no central generation
or even household generators. I mean that eve
Dear Jed,
I'm always trying to make sharp distinctions, and the best.
Megawatts are better than kilowatts and kilowatts are better than
milliwatts.
Perhaps each have their specific market however I have serious doubts for
milliwatts- energy sources for the pacemakers of cardiopathic artists in
the
On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
"The reviews were by scientists who were outraged -- outraged! --
because Watson told the truth about how science is done. As I said, he
also described himself as a lazy young man more into goofing off and
chasing women than working."
Kary Mu
Nice and simple paper, very informative.
The general delusion is so hard to accept when you get the data.
If you read French I can proudly say you that you should not read "La
Recherche" (a more academic local competitor to SciAm) on "Scientific
controversies" (
http://www.larecherche.fr/savoirs/
What the Ni/H reactor does is to convert heat into concentrated electric
and magnetic fields. Pure hydrogen is required to perform this function.
The first step in this conversion process is to convert heat into dipole
oscillations. Hydrogen helps to do this by trapping infrared photons that
fall
VERY good work from Violante.
I hope they look at the Ag and Y alloy with Pd.
Yes, you don't have to be in the kW to have very important work.
In fact, levels past about 250W start to get complicated and hard to use.
I have never seen anything over 250W where I felt comfortable about the
all meas
Peter Gluck wrote:
> I have just published:
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2013/08/why-pd-d-lenr-will-never-work.html
>
I think you are making distinctions that do not exist in nature. Cold
fusion is cold fusion. The smallest Pd-D effect is probably the same as
what Rossi observes. Research
Excellent paper Jed. Well done!
Eric Walker wrote:
> History does repeat itself, over and over.
>
Mark Twain supposedly said: "History does not repeat itself, but it does
rhyme." I agree. Things are never quite the same.
The quote from Watson is hysterical. His book, *The Double Helix*, is
hysterical. My edition from Norton
I added a photo of Gerischer from the university site:
http://www.fhi-berlin.mpg.de/pc/PChistory.html
You can see the resemblance to the caricature by my anonymous illustrator.
- Jed
Dear Readers,
Yiannis Hadjichristos has just called my attention to the following
paper, a real double rara avis:
- it is published in a peer reviewed journal;
- it clearly opts for a multi-stage theory, interdisciplinar approach.
It is
"Potential Exploration of Cold Fusion and Its Quantitative
36 matches
Mail list logo
