On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:29 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> A magnetic field is produced by the spin of a particle and movement of
> spin is not required.
>
I am reluctant to give spin much consideration, the definition of what it
is seems to change.
One thing I read stated that IIRC, the spin of a part
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:37 PM, John Berry wrote:
>
> Ok, let's keep it really simple.
>> Can you explain how a moving 'train' could measure the velocity of the
>> same photon/s as a stationary observer and measure the same velocity of
>> tho
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:37 PM, John Berry wrote:
Ok, let's keep it really simple.
> Can you explain how a moving 'train' could measure the velocity of the
> same photon/s as a stationary observer and measure the same velocity of
> those photons despite the trains motion, especially photons movi
I looked and found this one, while not the one I read initially, it will do
for now:
http://www.infinite-energy.com/iemagazine/issue59/adissidentview.html
What does one of the world's foremost experts on GPS have to say about
relativity theory and the Global Positioning System? Ronald R. Hatch is
A magnetic field is produced by the spin of a particle and movement of spin
is not required.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:07 AM, John Berry wrote:
> Dave, I think the simple answer is to recognize that a magnetic field only
> exists due to motion, and if SR is correct (it isn't and can't be) then
*Additionally there are cases where it has failed and these cases are
consistent with an entrained aether, apparently GPS satellite systems show
such issues.*
Can you say more about GPS satellite systems an their issues with the
aether or provide a reference.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:35 AM, Jo
Dave, I think the simple answer is to recognize that a magnetic field only
exists due to motion, and if SR is correct (it isn't and can't be) then we
should consider that every electric field can be seen as a magnetic field
in a different reference frame.
No magnetic field exists in all frames of
David, let me ask you this.
Did you understand my arguments?
Can you see a flaw in my arguments?
If you understand them and can't see a flaw, then can you see how SR could
be true anyway?
Does it make sense to accept an illogical and impossible theory just
because it often gives the right answe
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:39 PM, John Berry wrote:
>
> Also, I would genuinely like to know if anyone disagrees with my
>> arguments, or fails to understand them.
>>
>
> I had a hard time following your examples and counterexamples, but I
> su
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:27 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> John, you make a lot of interesting arguments, but special relativity
> always seems to come through with the right answers.
>
Mostly true, but it gives the same answers as an entrained aether.
Remember that SR is largely based of a rehash
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:47 PM, David Roberson wrote:
An ether does not appear to be required for the transmission of
> electromagnetic waves.
But what does it mean for something to be a "wave" without being a
disturbance in or of anything?
Eric
I wonder about the digital capacity of the vacuum. If the vacuum were
analogous to a computer memory, what is the memory limit of the vacuum? Can
a small volume of the vacuum be saturated by many matter waves? What is the
result of this overloading of the quantum capacity of the vacuum? Can there
b
I wrote:
I get the impression that relativity fits the known facts to within a very
> small error, and that any thought experiments concerning corner cases that
> are far removed from everyday experience nonetheless remain internally
> consistent.
>
I should add one qualification. Mainstream phy
Eric, I agree with you that special relativity is going to be a hard one to
bring down. I have tried plenty of times to no avail.
An ether does not appear to be required for the transmission of electromagnetic
waves. My first encounter with that issue came up in fields classes when my
profes
John, you make a lot of interesting arguments, but special relativity always
seems to come through with the right answers.
When I ponder these same issues I can always bring myself back to earth by
considering the behavior of a particle accelerator such as the LHC. It is hard
to doubt that the
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:39 PM, John Berry wrote:
Also, I would genuinely like to know if anyone disagrees with my arguments,
> or fails to understand them.
>
I had a hard time following your examples and counterexamples, but I
suspect that relativity will not be so easy to pull apart. There's
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1309.1288v1.pdf
Nuclear magnetization in gallium arsenide quantum dots at zero magnetic
fields
Another example as follows:
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v7/17
Long-lived singlet states--zero-spin states made of two spin-
particles--can be created by combining two differen
John,
It would be difficult to answer your questions without taking a lot of time so
I think that you should keep one main thought in mind. All of the effects that
I am describing are those seen by an observer and not actually evident to the
pair of electrons. They view the world from their p
The universe is a spin net liquid, that they have called the Higgs field.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 9:39 PM, John Berry wrote:
> Not that it matters, but I gave the speed of light in km a second and then
> said meters a second...
>
> Also, I would genuinely like to know if anyone disagrees with m
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZlPbWQIr5M
What is the Higgs boson? John Ellis, theoretical physicist
Asked what he thought was the best analogy for the Higgs boson, Prof Higgs
said he preferred theoretical physicist John Ellis's "snowfield" to
"treacle", which he objected to strongly becau
Not that it matters, but I gave the speed of light in km a second and then
said meters a second...
Also, I would genuinely like to know if anyone disagrees with my arguments,
or fails to understand them.
And if you do agree, would you conclude that an aether of some type is
logically required?
Originally the aether was thought to exist, but it was hoped the earth
would move though it rather than entrain it, maybe as a continued departure
from earth centric thinking, or more likely because a static aether was far
more simple than trying to understand an aether that was entrained to some
Very simply, the huge magnetic fields is a result of packing EMF tightly
into a very confined relative volume thereby squeezing the EMF in position
and increasing its momentum.
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Arnaud Kodeck wrote:
> Bob,
>
> As far as I know, there is no external magnetic field
This is like a God's eye view of the state. You see outages appear and then
disappear, like bubbles. Here is a notice that just appeared north of
Savannah:
*Customers Affected:* 796
*Estimated Restoration:* Feb 18, 10:30 PM
A vehicle accident has caused an outage in your area. We apologize for an
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:14 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Harry,
>
> I see your objection and I certainly would agree that two electrons moving
> in parallel to each other would not see any relative motion. The question
> that we need to address is how does a randomly moving observer make a
> de
You ask a lot of interesting questions. Perhaps we should set aside some time
to determine if they have good answers.
I certainly believe that a single charge moving relative to an observer
generates a measurable magnetic field that varies with time and position. Such
a field that is changing
Harry,
I see your objection and I certainly would agree that two electrons moving in
parallel to each other would not see any relative motion. The question that
we need to address is how does a randomly moving observer make a determination
that a magnetic field would influence the forces appe
Here is an image of the heating element arrangement in the Rossi hot cat. The
slots are long, the wire in the slots is coiled, and there are lots of slots.
Presumably it is resistance wire.
This is not representative of Rossi’s other devices, but it is his most robust
– and one can imagine l
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:51 AM, H Veeder wrote:
> If these presentations are logically correct than it should be possible
> for an observer to increase or decrease the magnetic force between point
> charges by simply choosing to move relative the charges at speeds much less
> than c. Since thi
Dave,
John is saying is that the Biot Savart law for a point charge only makes
sense if the velocity refers to the relative motion between the point
charge and another charge. Since there is no relative motion between the
charges in your example there should be no magnetic force.
However, I have
I have been speculating that the large magnetic field and the level of LENR
activity are directly related. If a positive feedback arrangement exists where
an increase in magnetic field results in an increase in LENR activity that then
causes an increase in field larger than the initial delta, y
The second phi is the same as the 3rd symbol font phi in chrome.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 7:20 AM, wrote:
> The one that is giving me trouble is phi a circle with a line though it.
> This is what Greek has:
>
> φ Φ
>
>
>
> They are not quite right. Here it is in symbol
>
>
> font.
>
>
> Φ
>
Bob,
As far as I know, there is no external magnetic field applied to the reactor
by means of coils. Anyway, the H field might become from the lattice itself?
Rossi and DGT have said to measure huge magnetic field near the reactor.
Always difficult to know what is the cause and what is the result
A useful experiment for MFMP to undertake would be to fabricate 5 micron
particles out of the alloy like commercial Cu-Ni-Mn alloy (named Konstantan
or ISOTAN 44) treat it with acid to etch each micro particle with an
irregular surface.
Then produce potassium and hydrogen nanoparticles using a spa
From: Bob Cook
The K could be a supplier of heavy eletrons per the W-L theory. I have no
idea how its radioactive decay could influence a LENR, unless it were by the
spectrum of lattice vibrations caused by the K-40 decay.
There are many possibilities. The main decay mode in 40K
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Bob Cook wrote:
> Jones--
>
> The K could be a supplier of heavy eletrons per the W-L theory.
>
The W-L theory is not a valid theory of LENR.
> I have no idea how its radioactive decay could influence a LENR,
>
radioactive decay does not activate LENR
Jones,
Why don't you contact them directly. You know much more about it than I do.
They have a comments section after the message and it is clear they read
the comments.
See the end of
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/powder-test-cells/361-powder-
Alan--
Any good theory added freely to general understanding of LENR should make
National news.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Alan Fletcher
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:41 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Dr. Stoyan Sarg steps up
From: "Blaze Spinnaker"
Sent: Mo
Jones--
The K could be a supplier of heavy eletrons per the W-L theory. I have no
idea how its radioactive decay could influence a LENR, unless it were by the
spectrum of lattice vibrations caused by the K-40 decay. Is the energy
sufficient? The K-40 gamma may be degraded by the lose
Amaud and Jones--
Keep in mind that at least for magnetic coupling--spin/angular momentum and
its associated energy-- it is possible to modify resonant energy levels of
the QM system by changing the magnitude of the static H field. Transitions
between J spin states can be created to match the
From: a.ashfield
See
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/powder-test-cells/361-powder-
push
There seems a disagreement, with MFMP saying.
"In the E-cat reactor, the Rydberg state is probably created by using of
some radioactive isotope, while in the Hyperion reactor a high voltage
Here is the final notice at:
http://outagemap.georgiapower.com/external/default.html
*2/16/2014, 4:00 p.m.*
As of 4:00 p.m., we have restored service to 700,000 customers since the
beginning of the storm early Wednesday morning. The remaining few
customers able to take service are located in th
Jones--
However,
1. Static magnetic fields should align particles with a magnetic moment.
2. The strength of the field should separate the energy level levels for
spin associated with the system.p
3. These spin states would fix the resonant oscillations of a magnetic
field that would couple
> From: "Blaze Spinnaker"
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 10:37:12 PM
> http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/powder-test-cells/361-powder-push
>> Well, Stoyan has a LOT of experience in this area and is willing to share
>> that too!
- - - -
Huh?
The one that is giving me trouble is phi a circle with a line though it. This
is what Greek has:
φ Φ
They are not quite right. Here it is in symbol
font.
Φ
Frank
See
http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/follow/powder-test-cells/361-powder-push
There seems a disagreement, with MFMP saying.
"In the E-cat reactor, the Rydberg state is probably created by using of
some radioactive isotope, while in the Hyperion reactor a high voltage
discharge is used."
Apologies for the typos in the previous hasty message...
To follow up on a few details related to NMR/Mossbauer in nickel - and to
include one recently learned tidbit of information:
Iron-57 is 2.2% of natural iron and has spin of ½ and nuclear magnetic
moment of .09 and a resonance transition f
Ni61 is the only odd isotope of Ni and count only for 1% of the natural
Nickel. It will be huge cost to "enrich" the Ni61.
Ni61 + p => Cu62 which is beta+ emitter which would be easy detected in
positron/electron annihilation. I don't think this is the reaction which
happends inside Rossi's re
Axil,
That is good stuff.
The lensing along jet streams prior to severe weather as well as the
superconducting of a portion of the EMR from radars is exactly the effect I
(think) I have been seeing in our atmosphere. We call the phenomena "St.
Elmo's Fire" and "Sun Dogs" and "Ice Halos" and "Fly
Axil-
The squeezing of a H molecule or a proton inside a Ni body-centered cubic cell
may change the angular momentum of the trapped entity and facilitate spin
coupling with one or more different Ni nuclei, and transmutation to a lower
energy, if such a state is available with the particles
From: Arnaud Kodeck
From DGT, we know that the nickel needs to be above the debye
temperature for the Rossi effect to take place. Vibration in the lattice is
a key element. The Mossbauer effect could be the excitation needed for the
vibration in the lattice to take place.
Axil—Is this just the uncertainty principle in action?
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 10:38 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Slow quantum packets can tunnel thru high Coulomb barrier
More...
The spin produced by slow light will also be squeezed. When the position of
>From DGT, we know that the nickel needs to be above the debye temperature
for the Rossi effect to take place. Vibration in the lattice is a key
element. The Mossbauer effect could be the excitation needed for the
vibration in the lattice to take place.
Jones, can you explain what do you mean by M
53 matches
Mail list logo
