Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:nice essay Jed

2014-05-11 Thread Axil Axil
I am simply asking you how you came to arrive at your opinion. If such a request offends you then forget this attempt at further communication. On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Kevin O'Malley wrote: > Once again, you're confused. Just because someone can't "explain" a > phenomena (like cold f

Re: [Vo]:Scientists discover nickel-eating plant species

2014-05-11 Thread John Berry
So, it could be a good way to remove nickel pollution... OR if it is doing some biological transmutation maybe it is making nickle... On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 2:29 PM, James Bowery wrote: > A new plant species with an unusual lifestyle – it eats nickel for a > living – has been discovered, acc

Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio

2014-05-11 Thread David Roberson
The specifications for the radar system below are typical of a pulsed radar system and not what I would expect from a standard Doppler radar. The duty cycle appears to be .1% for the unit listed whereas a Doppler radar is CW. The average power is 1300 watts of RF into the antenna, I assume.

[Vo]:Scientists discover nickel-eating plant species

2014-05-11 Thread James Bowery
A new plant species with an unusual lifestyle – it eats nickel for a living – has been discovered, according to a recent study. Scientists from the University of the Philippines, Los Baños have discovered Rinorea niccolifera, a plant species that accumulates up to 18,000 ppm of the metal in its le

Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio

2014-05-11 Thread ChemE Stewart
Eric, I appreciate your feedback. I agree that the two are separate. I am working on one wildlife research paper that just details a correlation between fish dying due to hypoxia/algae blooms and locations of microwave radar towers in the State of Florida, it is almost complete, I have placed num

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--

2014-05-11 Thread Daniel Rocha
I was thinking about this. Since this patent application is worthless, Rossi could well apply again without any loss of prior art, since he didn't establish any clear to begin with. -- Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com

RE: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio

2014-05-11 Thread Jones Beene
Very interesting, Stewart The frequency is 2.8 GHz That means the wavelength is pretty close to the 4 inch geometry of the ferrite billet of the Manelas devise. There is a picture of it in the slides. You can see that the way that the permanent magnetic field is imprinted will allow a needle

Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio

2014-05-11 Thread Eric Walker
Stewart, I have glanced at your web site. I have not taken a close look at your research, but I would not be surprised if you ended up being onto something about doppler radar being a source of hypoxia, oxygen free radicals and the death of nearby animal and plant life. You also have a theory of

Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio

2014-05-11 Thread ChemE Stewart
Radar/Call SignMHTModelASR-9Max Pulsed Power (Watts)1,300,000Gain (dBi)34Frequency (MHz)2,800RPM12.5Max Power Density (W/m2) @ 10 km10.39Pulse Duration(uSec) 1.00Pulse Repition Factor (Hz)1,000Range Est. (Miles)60Latitude42.937248 Longitude-71.437286FIPS33011CountyHillsboroughStateNH On Sun, May

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--

2014-05-11 Thread Kevin O'Malley
US Examiner Addresses Andrea Rossi US Patent Application Previous Next -

Re: [Vo]:Increasing probability of Rossi being real upwards, to 35%

2014-05-11 Thread Blaze Spinnaker
Decreasing probability to 46% based on lack of news from Nanor but up to 47% based on recent news from Darden in China: http://www.icebank.cn/news/detail_2.php?id=118 hat tip: http://www.e-catworld.com/2014/05/09/tom-darden-involved-in-opening-of-nickel-hydrogen-energy-research-center-in-tianjin

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--

2014-05-11 Thread Blaze Spinnaker
Define what you mean by protection. Rossi is not going to get a patent on anything until he actually explains exactly what he's doing. On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > Daniel-- > > What is your understanding of when day 1 starts--when the patent is > approved or when the app

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--

2014-05-11 Thread Bob Cook
Daniel-- What is your understanding of when day 1 starts--when the patent is approved or when the application is made? Rossi's application was made in 2009 TMK, and 17 years of protection is added from the day the patent is approved or issued by the PO, if that happens. Bob - Original

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--

2014-05-11 Thread Daniel Rocha
For patents, protection starts on day 1. I really don't know what Rossi can do. 2014-05-11 18:43 GMT-03:00 Bob Cook : > [image: Boxbe] This message is eligible > for Automatic Cleanup! (frobertc...@hotmail.com) Add cleanup > rule

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--

2014-05-11 Thread Daniel Rocha
His co worker. He needs to do that to the patent analyzer. 2014-05-11 18:13 GMT-03:00 Kevin O'Malley : > [image: Boxbe] This message is eligible > for Automatic Cleanup! (kevmol...@gmail.com) Add cleanup > rule

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--

2014-05-11 Thread Bob Cook
Rossi's partners at Industrial Heat (IH) are probably familiar with the patent system and are stringing out the issuance as long as possible. Like Dave said, this allows patent protection into the future as long as possible. Rossi did say recently on his blog that he does not understand the t

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--

2014-05-11 Thread Kevin O'Malley
Rossi has already done that. He reported that last year his coworkers were able to build one of his devices and get excess heat simply on his instructions, without him being in the room (or even being on the same continent). On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 10:52 PM, Blaze Spinnaker wrote: > Rossi needs

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:nice essay Jed

2014-05-11 Thread Kevin O'Malley
Once again, you're confused. Just because someone can't "explain" a phenomena (like cold fusion branching) doesn't mean the phenomena doesn't exist. Rocks fell from the sky for centuries before the explanation was ever figured out. Please try to come up to speed on the process of science, especi

Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio

2014-05-11 Thread James Bowery
Erratum: He may not have worked on SETI directly but he did work on the Arecibo dish used by SETI. On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 2:07 PM, James Bowery wrote: > BTW, he worked on SETI and is convinced a $500 upgrade to the dish is all > that's required to turn it into a vector potential receiver/tran

Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio

2014-05-11 Thread James Bowery
BTW, he worked on SETI and is convinced a $500 upgrade to the dish is all that's required to turn it into a vector potential receiver/transmitter. He's also believes vector potential to be more advanced technology and therefore more likely to detect intelligent ET life. On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 1

Re: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio

2014-05-11 Thread James Bowery
>From the author: It may be shown that A of the form: A=exp[-j(wt-kz) satisfies the scalar Helmholtz wave equation. For example, see J.D.Jackson "Classical Electrodynamics" or John Kraus "Antennas". Reading these back in 2005, I knew that A would propagate even before I did

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--

2014-05-11 Thread David Roberson
Could he be hoping for a place holder where he can fill in the blanks later? The further into the future he receives a valid patent, the longer he will be able to keep the royalties flowing. The initial filing might be used to establish priority. Dave -Original Message- From

Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo] Rossi Effect Not Before June--

2014-05-11 Thread James Bowery
Rossi's behavior toward patent law is most curious. He obviously doesn't really want a patent because to get one that's enforceable/valid he would have to meet the fundamental criteria of disclosure. So I don't know what he thinks he's up to with these patent applications. On Sun, May 11, 2014

RE: [Vo]:Vector Potential Wave Radio

2014-05-11 Thread Jones Beene
From: James Bowery Just got off the phone with the author and he doesn't see any indication Tesla was onto the vector potential -- which Maxwell called "electrokinetic momentum". BTW: He says Maxwell made no bones about the physical reality of electrokinetic momentum -- he was quite cle