I seem to remember a old LENR truism that has come down over the years
which remarks about how a shock is required before the LENR reaction
starts. When I first began my studies of the LENR reaction so very long
ago, I may have read this in regards to the work from perhaps the most
famous Japanese
Ultra dense hydrogen is a natural state of hydrogen when it is absorbed into
metal lattices. It is just that simple, Martin Fleischmann spoke endlessly of
this from the very beginning. Almost all who have been successful have clearly
followed similar paths to making ‘sweet spots’ in their materi
IMHO in the Holmlid experiment, ultra dense hydrogen (UDH) is produced in
the presence of hydrogen by the iron oxide/potassium catalyst and falls
onto the collection foil. That foil is made of a noble metal: iridium,
palladium, or platinum. What this metal is made of is important because
that coll
Proton proton involves the creation of charmed and strange quarks(the
D-meson?). When you figure out how those guys work, explain it simply so
that both me and your grandmother can understand it.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 7:40 PM, wrote:
> I would question why a neutral Kaon can not decay into 2 n
What is confusing you is that Holmlid has changed his mind based on further
research. He now says that the energies produced at the primary point of
the reaction on the collection foil produces far too much energy to be
derived from fusion. Holmlid states that this energy comes from double
proton a
The significance of the theory that the Dutch theoretical physicist Erik
Verlinde offers as an alternative to the dark matter particle idea has
great import and application to the LENR paradigm.
The basic idea behind Erik Verlinde theory is the gravity can be weakened
when ambient matter in galaxi
This is actually about energy policy.
I expect that Trump's Sec. of State Tillerson will be in charge of energy
policy. He was the head of Exxon until a few weeks ago. He says that the
U.S. should bar the Chinese from accessing the islands they have recently
constructed. See:
http://www.nytimes.c
I would question why a neutral KAON CAN NOT DECAY INTO 2 NEUTRAL MUONS? IF THE
DATA ON NORMAL KAON DECAY IS FROM HIGH ENERGY 2-BODY REACTIONS, THEN RESONANT
STIMULATION OF D AND P BY EM MAY RESULT IN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT RESULTS
STATISTICALLY—I.E., 2 NEUTRAL KAONS INSTEAD OF A + AND – PAIR BEING
The vital question is about the rate vs. distance for the emergence of
detectable muons. Surely there is a distribution bell curve regarding which we
cold fusioneers are most interested in the nearest limb of that distribution.
This then speaks to the reaction rate producing the meson beasties w
I believe there are circular arguments going on here. On the one hand you
are saying that neutral mesons are decaying into muons (charged) far from
the reactor. But also there is the claim of fusion in his reactor, wherein
many are supposing MCF. He is also measuring charged particles in his
rea
This is yet another example of the fossil fuel industry using government to
stifle progress and competition. See:
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/articles/2017/01/wyoming-s-utilities-may-soon-be-banned-from-buying-large-scale-renewables.html
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Russ George wrote:
No insinuation by me I simply don’t trust anyone who stands by Huizenga!
Who's standing by Huizenga?
Eric
Amongst the thousands of scientists who work with CERN most are still driven by
true scientific curiosity, the holiest of holy's. Alas many are simply
avaricious testosterone mutants, those sorts of personalities all to often
float to the top where they are noticeable by all three senses.
-
No insinuation by me I simply don’t trust anyone who stands by Huizenga!
From: Eric Walker [mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 11:32 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.
Hi Russ,
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Russ George ma
That’s good to hear that Holmlid is using bubble detectors, they are superb for
this sort of measurement. It’s of course all about how many activations might
take place.
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 11:30 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New p
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/01/jan-21-2017-dscussing-quality-and.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
When you think about it - why would CERN want to test Holmlid's device ?
Isn't it lose, lose, lose for them... if the test is successful?
Hundreds of lucrative jobs could be lost. Prestige is a stake. Big
science is at stake. Where is the silver lining for CERN?
Of course, the "science" alone
Hi Russ,
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Russ George wrote:
Huizenga being the lying conniving troll that he was reneged on his
> commitment. Anyone who stands by Huizenga as a credible person is either a
> complete fool or a disreputable troll.
>
Perhaps you're insinuating something that wasn
Holmlid uses bubble detectors to check for neutrons and no bubbles have
ever been seen.
The production of quack soup through heavy element ion collisions that they
do at CERN have to produce some neutrons.
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Russ George wrote:
> Not so fast! It's hardly so simple
Some of us in the cold fusion experimentalist world offered in public in front
of witnesses to demonstrate cold fusion to Huizenga, who agreed though insisted
he’d do so only in a lab of his choosing, the lab agreed, independent
scientists volunteered to witness. Huizenga being the lying connivi
Eric---
You would think so that the high energy folks at CERN would comment, unless
they are concerned about their future at CERN.
I would pick others to give reputable reports on muons.
I would look to the comments of retired high energy physicists that worked on
the super collider in Texas
Not so fast! It's hardly so simple as just putting an unknown physics
experiment next to a valuable detector. No one would be foolish enough to risk
the trying to catch the unknown in such a rare net of the known without some
preliminary tests. I once was lent a very sophisticated detector to st
Here is an image of ATLAS.
http://www.atlasexperiment.org/photos/atlas_photos/selected-photos/full-detector/0511013_02-A4-at-144-dpi.jpg
The guy standing in the bottom/center gives an idea of the Scale.
Heck LH doesn't need a miniature version - that is an unnecessary delay:
the version that i
On Sat, Jan 21, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Holmlid et al are planning to put a miniaturized version of their
> experiment inside a full scale particle detector. My guess is that that
> detector will be ATLAS since Holmlid is in contact with the particle
> physics at CERN.
>
Good to know.
Eric--
In other words. DOA, dead on arrival…
Bob Cook
From: Eric Walker
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2017 9:44 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:New paper from Holmlid.
Has Holmlid enlisted outside help in characterizing these charged and neutral
radiations in this latest paper? I'v
Holmlid et al are planning to put a miniaturized version of their
experiment inside a full scale particle detector. My guess is that that
detector will be ATLAS since Holmlid is in contact with the particle
physics at CERN.
Holmlid is working with Sveinn Olafsson who is a nuclear physics who buil
Has Holmlid enlisted outside help in characterizing these charged and
neutral radiations in this latest paper? I've been hoping he would do so
for years. To summarize what has instead been reported in papers leading
up to this one: an alleged muon, pion and kaon radiation field, inferred
from th
IMHO the Holmild reactiom is not LENR—LOW energy nuclear reaction nor a LATTICE
assisted nuclear reaction. The high energy particles belie LENR.
The key question is: “HOW DO ALL THE NEUTRAL PARTICLES GET THEIR SIGNIFICANT
ENERGY”.
It seems from Holmild’s description of the experiment that
watch out for "total protonic reversal"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyKQe_i9yyo
Harry
Bob Higgins wrote:
The descriptions in 5,8) below suggests that Holmlid's reaction
produces a high muon flux that would escape the reactor. A high muon
flux would be very similar to a high beta flux. First of all, it
would seem that a flux of charged muons would be highly absorbed in
the re
The descriptions in 5,8) below suggests that Holmlid's reaction produces a
high muon flux that would escape the reactor. A high muon flux would be
very similar to a high beta flux. First of all, it would seem that a flux
of charged muons would be highly absorbed in the reactor walls. Those
muons
31 matches
Mail list logo
