Bob Higgins wrote:
Jed, You are backing yourself into an extremist position with your latest
> comments.
>
Saying that an experiment failed is not extremist. Most experiments fail.
> I don't believe that you or anyone else has enough data to *prove* that
> there
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Axil Axil wrote:
Then IH has nothing to lose by revealing what they cannot get to work.
It is described in the patent. They cannot get the machines in the
patent to work, therefore the patent is invalid and the IP has no
value. If someone else can make the patent
I wrote:
> That's a different isotope. That's U-235. There are not a million pounds
> of U-235 in basement of the plant, and what there is mixed in with U-238.
>
U-235 is 4% of the fuel in a reactor. It is 0.7 of natural uranium.
> Again, you can't take the Pu because it is mixed in with
Jed, You are backing yourself into an extremist position with your latest
comments. I don't believe that you or anyone else has enough data to
*prove* that there was 0 excess heat in Rossi's attempt at a contrived
"GPT". XH in this long experiment may not be close to what Rossi claims,
but
This link might help with the flurry of nonsense in the Vortex
http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/dementia/agitation-elderly
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2017 4:47 PM
To: Vortex
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fukushima much worse than imagined
Jones
Jones Beene wrote:
> The Fukushima nuclear plant is missing 600 tons of highly radioactive,
> melted uranium. That is no exaggeration. Google it.
>
> Yup, way over a million pounds. A small warhead requires around 50 pounds.
>
That's a different isotope. That's U-235.
Axil Axil wrote:
Then IH has nothing to lose by revealing what they cannot get to work.
>
It is described in the patent. They cannot get the machines in the patent
to work, therefore the patent is invalid and the IP has no value. If
someone else can make the patent work,
Axil,
Have you not seen Rossi's patent?
It doesn't even mention LENR and protects very little.
AA
On 2/18/2017 6:08 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi's IP is protected by a patent so he is covered. It is worthwhile
to verify that that patent is valid.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 6:05 PM, a.ashfield
This has been done. I.H. spent large sums of money and worked with experts.
They determined that the patent is not valid.
IH should make everything that supports this statement public so that it
can be verified by others in a public venue. IH has nothing to lose by
supporting their claims by
Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi's IP is protected by a patent so he is covered.
>
A patent that does not work and cannot be replicated is not valid. It is
worthless. He is not protected against anything. In the highly unlikely
scenario that he actually has a positive result, he will
No one has been able to replicate Rossi or his patents.
Then IH has nothing to lose by revealing what they cannot get to work. If
someone can get it to work, then IH will benefit from that effort.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 6:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Axil Axil
Jed, "none of these replicators has succeeded. Not one."
Russian Group Claims Rossi/Parkhomov Replication Success
http://www.lenr-coldfusion.com/2015/10/05/russian-group-claims-rossiparkhomov-replication-success/
AA
On 2/18/2017 5:53 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Axil Axil
Rossi's IP is protected by a patent so he is covered. It is worthwhile to
verify that that patent is valid.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 6:05 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
> Axil,
> Going into the experiment with the idea of proving doesn't work reminds me
> of MIT and Pons &
Axil Axil wrote:
Ahern's current effort is a red herring in regard to Rossi's IP.
>
I repeat, his effort has NOTHING TO DO WITH ROSSI, or Rossi's IP! It
predates Rossi by many years.
What the hell are you talking about here? It is not a red herring, or blue
or green
IH should want to prove that Rossi's IP is a fraud and that they want to
recover that $11 million in a case that features as evidence and expert
testimony many hundreds of failed replications as they have themselves
failed.
Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our
Here is the bottom-line fact that should scare everyone, even those
fearless fission advocates who can accept an occasional Chernobyl and
TMI is the regrettable part of the package-deal for cheap power.
The Fukushima nuclear plant is missing 600 tons of highly radioactive,
melted uranium.
Ahern's current effort is a red herring in regard to Rossi's IP. Jed, your
position is helping both IH and Rossi hide from fact finding. Why is your
aim to hide the facts. You must believe that Rossi's IP is valid and want
to protect IH from revealing it as open source.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at
Axil,
Going into the experiment with the idea of proving doesn't work reminds
me of MIT and Pons & Fleischmann.
What happens if the experiment did work? Then IH would have given away
Rossi's IP for nothing and stripped Rossi of what little protection he
does have.
AA
On 2/18/2017 5:55 PM,
Axil Axil wrote:
Brian Ahern would want to verify that Rossi's IP is a fraud as a
> statement of verified fact.
>
Perhaps he would, but his experiment has NOTHING TO DO WITH ROSSI. You
wrote that he is replicating. That is false. If anything, it is the other
way around.
Brian Ahern would want to verify that Rossi's IP is a fraud as a
statement of verified fact. IH et al wound want to verify their
assertion that Rossi's IP does not work. If IH is telling truth that IP is
nothing, then they lose nothing related to that IP and advance their case
against Rossi.
On
Axil Axil wrote:
There are dozens of well motivated open source replicators of Ross's tech
> working now including brian Ahern . . .
>
Ahern is trying to replicate an experiment that was done many years before
Rossi began work. It has nothing to do with Rossi, except for
Another one bites the dust
It’s now at least the seventh robot to have broken down while investigating
> Fukushima’s nuclear reactors, which remain highly radioactive. *Reuters* had
> counted up to five by March 2016
>
Axil,
I don't think it follows that IH is free to do what they want with
Rossi's IP. If that were the case why would they have agreed to give
Rossi $89 million? Surely his technology, if it works, is worth more
than $11 million.
I also thought Brian Ahern had expressed his opinion that
There are dozens of well motivated open source replicators of Ross's tech
working now including brian Ahern and an additional hundreds that will
enter the field as soon as Rossi's tech is made available. I am disgusted
with all the innuendo that is involved in the Rossi tech issue. It will be
Axil,
Apart from some of that information being proprietary it doesn't help to
have this run by avowed enemies. Remember how MIT and CalTec bodged the
replication of Pons & Fleischmann?
AA
On 2/18/2017 2:53 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
IH would be well served to release all the Rossi provided INFO
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/02/feb-18-2017-professional-approach-to.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Here are two other frightening data points.
1. Some years ago, NHK (national TV) had a special on the effect on
wildlife in Fukushima Pref. There has been a tremendous increase in the
animal population because humans evacuated farmland. It is all growing back
into forest. That part is okay. But
IH would be well served to release all the Rossi provided INFO involving
the Rossi reaction to the open source community and Brian Ahern as its most
prominent member to allow that community to run tests to see if Rossi's
technology is a fraud. This verification would support IH in their claims
question is the distance,
it is well explained, especially in extremetech article.
there changed the distance, and the measure changed.
anyway, on this subject too, there is bubbles.
I'm tired.
2017-02-18 20:00 GMT+01:00 Jones Beene :
>
> Fear-mongering? LOL. Apparently
Leonart,
I agree with you. It serves no useful purpose to repetitively run down
Rossi like Jed and Brian do.
I do think Rossi has discovered something for the reasons Frank Acland
wrote here: (saves me writing it myself.)
http://www.e-catworld.com/why-i-believe-in-the-e-cat/
AA
On 2/18/2017
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> Worst of all - 5 years from now, the situation could be more toxic, since
> it appears 3 completely unconstrained cores are converting fertile uranium
> into fissile plutonium at an unexpected rate. Again, if a
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8GUYFzBq3VU
PBS Nova Nuclear Meltdown Disaster
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1406/1406.1200.pdf
Detecting Special Nuclear Material Using Muon-Induced Neutron Emission
Muon imaging could help image the meltdown cores at meltdown sites.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2017
Fear-mongering? LOL. Apparently Alain does not look at the dates of
these attempts at what are essentially PR, many of which were sanitized
and put into circulation by TEPCO or their insurance carrier. The
company has been caught in many outright lies since the accident and
this is more of
I note your pseudo skeptical certainty, but the truth will not be known
until all the data comes out in the trial. Now set for June.
AA
On 2/18/2017 7:44 AM, Brian Ahern wrote:
I was watching a program about O.J. Simpson and how he had a loyal
following. I see parallels to Rossi's loyal
Brian it is not a question of being a believer. Rossi has propelled LENR
forward. If he has what says _ then great.
If he does not have it we will soon learn. Than he still has contributed. I
then have a hard time understanding why he still works on the project
Why not save the good earnings. Well
to relativize the fearmongering
http://spectrum.ieee.org/energywise/energy/nuclear/high-fukushima-radiation-estimates-no-surprise-to-experts
https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/243904-fukushimas-reactor-2-far-radioactive-previously-realized-no-sign-containment-breach
Fukushima much worse than imagined - 3 cores in runaway meltdown with no
chance to stop them. China syndrome in reverse...
Makes Chernobyl look like spilled milk
http://www.environews.tv/world-news/alert-new-radiation-readings-fukushima-reactor-2-unimaginable-lethal-1-min/
How long before the
I was watching a program about O.J. Simpson and how he had a loyal following. I
see parallels to Rossi's loyal following.
"Feed a cold and starve a fever;
argue with no true believer."
It is a waste of effort to expect the citizens of Planet Rossi to abandon their
hero. He is too
38 matches
Mail list logo