Actually, the process that produces the vacuum effects in the LENR reaction
is a Bose condensate. This condensate is a duel of the cosmological black
hole. What that means is that the Bose condensate adheres to the same
equations that describes a black hole. But there is no gravity effects
involved
Hawking radiation is comprised of two entangled photons, One photon is an
IR photon and the other is a photon that has a negative frequency partner
to the IR photon.
The negative frequency photon when normalize to a positive frequency turns
into a UV photon.
Time stops at the event horizon. The U
Brian Ahern wants to know more about your aether issues.
From: Jonathan Berry
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 10:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Antimatter
Hi Vorts, I have an interesting connection my research has made that seems to
connect to ant
What was the unusual coil?
From: Jonathan Berry
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 10:56 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Antimatter
BTW, a necessary part of that theory of "part filled containers". the idea that
electrons, protons and such might be ab
First a small theoretical update.
A proton consists of a 2x2 core relativistic wave structure that couples
with a three wave excess-energy flux part and a two wave charge
structure. In SO(4) we have a 5 rotation structure where core mass only
can have 4 and charge has 5. This model is highly a
Robin—
I think you are close to the real model of protons and neutrons. This
consideration reflects P. Hatt’s model of nucleons as validated by high energy
inelastic electron scattering experiments.
The experiments have been evaluated by William Stubbs in several papers and in
his recent
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 13:59:28 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>First a small theoretical update.
>
>A proton consists of a 2x2 core relativistic wave structure that couples
>with a three wave excess-energy flux part and a two wave charge
>structure. In SO(4) we have a 5 ro
Unluckily charge is only known for the electron. The charge inside a
nucleus is given by a topological relation between waves. Charge is a
function of rotating mass. Thus your idea is to simple for next
generation of physics models.
J.W.
Am 30.08.19 um 21:45 schrieb mix...@bigpond.com:
In r
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 22:36:57 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Unluckily charge is only known for the electron. The charge inside a
>nucleus is given by a topological relation between waves. Charge is a
>function of rotating mass. Thus your idea is to simple for next
>gen
The answer is simple
q^2 --> rm. Charge square is proportional to rotating mass. In a proton
much more mass is needed to produce the same charge. Ergo adding an
electron can do nothing...
J.W.
Am 30.08.19 um 22:44 schrieb mix...@bigpond.com:
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30
The original unusual coil was thin magnet wire wound around another strand
of thin magnet wire...
Because the wire does not have the strength to be wound around, I would
wind it on a pin, slide it off, wind more and thread the other wire though
it.
The outer wire is a right handed helix.
Then the
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Fri, 30 Aug 2019 23:58:02 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>The answer is simple
>
>q^2 --> rm. Charge square is proportional to rotating mass. In a proton
>much more mass is needed to produce the same charge. Ergo adding an
>electron can do nothing...
>
>J.W.
Given tha
12 matches
Mail list logo
