Maybe, look at how both cases of levitation had one end up and one end down.
This suggests one of 2 things, they either made a ferromagnetic material
not a superconductor.
OR, they made a superconductor that is only superconductive at one end.
So a tiny bit of contamination only occurred at that
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 18 Aug 2023 16:13:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Two down
>
>https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/lk-99-room-temperature-superconductor/
...maybe the impurities are what it's all about. Clearly the substance they
produced behaved remarkably like a
superconductor.
Two down
https://techcrunch.com/2023/08/18/lk-99-room-temperature-superconductor/
On Thu, Aug 17, 2023, 7:37 PM Terry Blanton wrote:
> One down, one to go.
>
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/15/science/retraction-ranga-dias-rochester.html
>
> On Mon, Aug 7, 2023 at 6:33 PM Terry Blanton wro
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> > Otherwise there is no point. If it cannot be replicated, it is not
> > science. If the researcher wants to cash in on the discovery, that is
> > fine. He or she needs to file for a patent before publishing the paper.
>
> May be you see the point. With 3 months reports
On 18.08.2023 17:27, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Otherwise there is no point. If it cannot be replicated, it is not
science. If the researcher wants to cash in on the discovery, that is
fine. He or she needs to file for a patent before publishing the paper.
May be you see the point. With 3 months re
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Jed, I do not object reporting, but these blood suckers like to have
> detailed reports...This would be OK for 10x more money...
>
Everything must be published in enough detail to replicate the experiment.
Otherwise there is no point. If it cannot be replicated, it is not
Jed, I do not object reporting, but these blood suckers like to have
detailed reports...This would be OK for 10x more money...
Further:: A little bit more advanced experiments need high level
equipment. Like a multi target PVD coater, a good galvanostat and access
to a decent XRF just to name
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Not a single experienced researcher will spend more than a few seconds to
> read such outraging nonsense as writing progress reports every 3 months for
> e.g. 25k $ funding is just a bad joke...
>
I have given several researchers funding, with no strings attached. I
defin
8 matches
Mail list logo
