Howdy Thomas,
There is a far step from an inventor and an engineer- design team. Mention
the word "inventor" and we run. Mention the inventors' work is patented and
we duck our head waiting for the noise sure to follow.
All engine designs that perform useful work are similar. The difference
be
I corresponded with an inventor who had a patent on an engine design
that sounded similar to this.
R C Macaulay wrote:
Interesting thinking Jones. A proposed valveless, pistonless
engine/motor concept is being studied whereas the "engine" is ring
shaped and drives a cluster of embedded cavity
re stopped from pursuing them by the tired 'realities' of
money, competing priorities, and disagreements among ourselves.
Cheers,
Lawrence
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 9:27 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re:
bject: Re: [Vo]:"Tooo" obvious for Detroit?
Interesting thinking Jones. A proposed valveless, pistonless engine/motor
concept is being studied whereas the "engine" is ring shaped and drives a
cluster of embedded cavity discs positioned with the ring. The design
approach is t
Interesting thinking Jones. A proposed valveless, pistonless engine/motor
concept is being studied whereas the "engine" is ring shaped and drives a
cluster of embedded cavity discs positioned with the ring. The design
approach is to build a "planetary transmission with an engine inside" . The
t
The following suggestion, or a version of it, will be
implemented by some perceptive auto manufacturer in
the coming years.
Unfortunately, due to entrenched lethargy and inertia
and the "not-invented-here syndrome", it is doubtful
that US auto makers will be the first.
But on the off-chance that
6 matches
Mail list logo
