It’s right there for all to see hidden behind the Cheshire Cat’s grin!
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2016 11:07 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Bremsstrahlung experimental note
Can you point out the location of the mouse in Rossi&#
Can you point out the location of the mouse in Rossi's patent?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sun, Mar 13, 2016 3:34 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Bremsstrahlung experimental note
Something is getting out of the LENR reactor. The mouse is stimulatin
Something is getting out of the LENR reactor. The mouse is stimulating the
cat in Rossi's reactor clustering scheme. The some emission of the mouse is
producing the LENR reaction inside the Cat type reactor.
That emission only exits the Mouse when the power to the heater coils of
the Mouse is turn
Muons with less than about 4MeV are not going to escape the reactor.
Cosmic muons are average 2GeV. No magnetic field that I could generate is
going to significantly deflect either of these.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> @Bob
>
> Use a magnetic shield to divert muons and
@Bob
Use a magnetic shield to divert muons and other charged particles.
I describe it here
https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/index.php/Thread/2862-A-Simple-LENR-Magnetic-Radiation-Shield/?postID=15183#post15183
[image: Inline image 1]
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> Mu
From: Bob Higgins
Ø Muonic decay in the reactor is an interesting prospect that I would like to
read more about. However, I don't think the muons, electrons, or protons are
going to escape the reactor in any large number due to the mass/cm^2 they would
have to traverse to get out. Muons ar
Muonic decay in the reactor is an interesting prospect that I would like to
read more about. However, I don't think the muons, electrons, or protons
are going to escape the reactor in any large number due to the mass/cm^2
they would have to traverse to get out. Muons are no more likely to
penetra
Why does the burst last for just a second even when excess heat is
produced after the radiation burst?
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 4:25 PM, wrote:
> In reply to Bob Cook's message of Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:34:55 -0800:
> Hi,
> [snip]
>>The effectiveness of the SS can at stopping any high energy electr
In reply to Bob Cook's message of Fri, 11 Mar 2016 09:34:55 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>The effectiveness of the SS can at stopping any high energy electrons that
>cause Bremsstrahlung would depend upon the thickness of the can (or alumina)
>and the energy of the incident electrons. I think the loss of
This may provide
>> information about the reaction producing the electrons. The change of the
>> intensity of the Bremsstrahlung signal as a function of the magnetic field
>> would also provide information as to whether or not the lattice orientation
>> of the nano fue
d produced in some preferred
> direction.
>
> Bob Cook
> From: Bob Higgins
> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 6:09 AM
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: [Vo]: Bremsstrahlung experimental note
>
> I don't know if other Vorts thought of this already... but I had a minor
&
of the nano fuel was important. One might expect
that the electrons being produced by the respective LENR reaction would
produced in some preferred direction.
Bob Cook
From: Bob Higgins
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 6:09 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]: Bremsstrahlung experimental
Bob,
There is simply too little nickel. If looking for bremsstrahlung, and in the
absence of gamma - a possible source of high speed electrons would be muon
decay.
At least this would be true in a situation like the glow-tube, where dense
hydrogen would be expected to form.
If the c
I don't know if other Vorts thought of this already... but I had a minor
epiphany regarding the radiation that MFMP measured in GS5.2. We
identified this radiation tentatively as bremsstrahlung. This has certain
implications. Bremsstrahlung requires that the high speed electrons impact
on a high
14 matches
Mail list logo
