On 3/23/07, Jed Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps senility? Or the effect of that tree that almost knocked him off?
For which I advocate a new national holiday:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arbor_Day
After all, it *does* sequester CO2.
Terry
Steven Krivit wrote:
I have watched and listened to every word the man has publicly (and
to a certain extent privately) uttered on the subject for the last five years.
You have been paying close attention to Robert Park?!? Please stop
wasting your time on inanities. This is like watching turd
Jed,
I have watched and listened to every word the man has publicly (and to a
certain extent privately) uttered on the subject for the last five years.
There is a clear progression. Off the top of my head, he was reported to
have said on a Canadian radio show something about not buying it till
Edmund Storms wrote:
I suggest Park has simply reiterated his belief that the Jones
claims are real but not what Pons and Fleischmann discovered.
Ah, yes. The Jones ploy. I should have seen it coming.
In the past Park has excoriated Jones, so he must have someone else
in mind as the replacem
Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
As you had previously eluded, it would appear that those like Park
find it convenient to trick themselves into believing that LENR is NOT CF.
I once read a hilarious Japanese magazine article about Iwamura's
research. It included a comparison table and several pa
I suggest Park has simply reiterated his belief that the Jones claims
are real but not what Pons and Fleischmann discovered. This has been the
attitude of the skeptics from the very beginning. In short, I see no
change. I wrote to both Park and Garwin, describing by book and asking
if they wou
HI Jed,
> The Chemistry World magazine article that DonW posted
> here has a surprising statement:
>
> "Bob Park, at the University of Maryland . . .
> concedes that 'there are some curious reports - not
> cold fusion, but people may be seeing some unexpected
> low-energy nuclear reactions'."
>
can't find the exact quote.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Jed Rothwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ;
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 9:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Cold fusion back on the menu (ACS) 2007 conference
> The Chemistry World magazine article that D
The Chemistry World magazine article that DonW posted here has a
surprising statement:
"Bob Park, at the University of Maryland . . . concedes that 'there
are some curious reports - not cold fusion, but people may be seeing
some unexpected low-energy nuclear reactions'."
Coming from him, tha
http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/News/2007/March/22030701.asp
Cold fusion back on the menu
22 March 2007
Most chemists would rather forget all about cold fusion. After the barrage
of criticism dismissing Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann's sensational
1989 claims that nuclei could be forced t
10 matches
Mail list logo
