The statement: Dipole attraction exactly cancels monopole repulsion
at very short H-H distances. indicates the author probably hasn't
even done a basic seat of the pants calculation as to what this
means. This statement is nonsensical or irrelevant when applied to H-
H proximity prior to
Resend - Vortex not working
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner
The statement: Dipole attraction exactly cancels monopole repulsion
at very short H-H distances. indicates the author probably hasn't
even done a basic seat of the pants calculation as to what this
means. This
On Jan 28, 2011, at 7:42 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Resend - Vortex not working
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner
The statement: Dipole attraction exactly cancels monopole repulsion
at very short H-H distances. indicates the author probably hasn't
even done a basic seat of the
On Jan 28, 2011, at 10:13 AM, Horace Heffner wrote:
ones, you have to note the difference between energy and potentials
(Keesom), and forces (my formula).
That should have read: Jones, you have to note the difference
between energy and potentials (Keesom), and forces (my formula).
My
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:42:44 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
The energy of a Keesom
interaction depends on the inverse sixth power of the distance, not the
fourth or third.
Wouldn't this also mean that it dies off more rapidly with distance, implying
that the particles need
Hi Robin,
notice that the nuclear force also varies with the sixth power of
distance,
perhaps there is a connection?
Good point. I will attempt to engage Dr. Brown in further discourse on this.
Another interesting point is It is nevertheless already clear from the
above data that entangled
There are now over 320 comments on http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com...
Two caught my attention, the second one for all you theorists with a link to
arXiv doc!
-Mark
-- Comment 1 by Rossi -
By the way, we are manufacturing
Damn! What a coincidence.
I was just reading the Brown article.
I think he's got it almost cracked - Dipole attraction exactly cancels
monopole repulsion at very short H-H distances.
A must-read !
Jones
From: Mark Iverson [
-- Comment 2
http://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol2.pdf#page=50
This is the way I got hold of it.
From: Jones Beene
Damn! What a coincidence.
I was just reading the Brown article.
I think he's got it almost cracked - Dipole attraction exactly cancels
monopole repulsion at very short H-H
Here's an article date 1/17/2011 about an experiment that achieved superluminal
velocities...
and not just a few times c, but 310c... that's 58 million miles/sec, or 93.0e9
m/s!
At that speed, it won't take too long for ET to get home!
The J.S.Brown paper also says the following which is, I gather, pertinent to
LENR (obvious understatement):
It is hence reasonable to suppose that, once coherence has been established,
the height and width of the effective Coulomb barrier between neighbouring s, p
state pairs is reduced, with
This niche about dipole-dipole interactions could be even more important
within a Casimir cavity, especially if the cavity contains dense deuterium,
since the Brown parameters would presumable be closer together than he could
ever imagine.
The van der Waals interaction comes to mind as the sum
From: Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, January 27, 2011 11:09:29 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]: Comment on Rossi website of interest to theorists...
Here's an article date 1/17/2011 about an experiment that achieved
superluminal
velocities...
and not just
13 matches
Mail list logo