Michel Jullian wrote:
---
> I don't consider CF as "free energy",
---
Why not?
Regards,
Paul Lowrance
d are only tools and proposals which might help to
establish indisputability of excess heat claims in CF or other desktop fusion
experiments, nothing fundamental.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re:
Jones Beene wrote:
> If the curious would dump the silly rhetoric, take a moment to visit and
> study the excellent site of Professor Kowalski, they would discover that
> Michel Julian is, shall we opine metaphorically: knee deep into cold
> fusion... ... and we on Vo should be grateful for his ex
If the curious would dump the silly rhetoric, take a moment to visit and
study the excellent site of Professor Kowalski, they would discover that
Michel Julian is, shall we opine metaphorically: knee deep into cold
fusion... ... and we on Vo should be grateful for his expert opinions
on any rel
Gentlemen! ...to paraphrase Strangelove, you can't fight in here! This
is ... well not the war room, but the war-on-oil room.
Paul,
If you haven't seen this - someone may have mentioned it before - and have the
inclination to wade through a hundred pages, which will tell you a lot about
the Finn mentality and how they cope with interminable winters... and perhaps
even a few pages related to what you have been looking
Jones Beene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It would be more interesting if JNL could somehow measure temperature
> changes directly on the spinning magnetic material. He could use a
> thermal gun.
That probably will not happen, but then we have Steorn
This company
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would be more interesting if JNL could somehow measure temperature
changes directly on the spinning magnetic material. He could use a
thermal gun.
That probably will not happen, but then we have Steorn
This company is an enigma to me, as their approach is so.
8 matches
Mail list logo
