[mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 6:12 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion
TimesImprovement In Yield
Axil-
Did you leave Ni out of your list of LENR capable metals on purpose? B
The surface arrangement
:53 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion TimesImprovement
In Yield
Paintelli tells us that most transition metals are LENR
capable...titanium...copper...tungsten...silver.
On order to prove that this quantum metal hypothesis is the cause of LEN
l <janap...@gmail.com>
> *Sent: *Thursday, December 21, 2017 12:43 PM
> *To: *vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
>
> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion
> TimesImprovement In Yield
>
>
>
> Reference: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1612.03899
>
>
>
&
the electron configuration is for
the two lattices.
In addition what about Ni lattices?
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil<mailto:janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2017 12:43 PM
To: vortex-l<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion Time
semimetal-defines-deuterated-palladium/
>
>
>
> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 15, 2017 9:56 PM
> *To:* vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion
> TimesImprovement In Yield
>
]
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2017 9:56 PM
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion TimesImprovement
In Yield
IMHO, the muons come from hadronization of the energy stored by the metallic
hydrogen. The energy transferred from hadron
My baby...the hohlraum!
On Dec 16, 2017 7:28 PM, wrote:
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Sat, 16 Dec 2017 13:15:59 -0800:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>From: mix...@bigpond.com
>
>? What bothered me most, is that the device is a "one shot", IOW it gets
destroyed
>and replaced with
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Sat, 16 Dec 2017 13:15:59 -0800:
Hi Jones,
[snip]
>From: mix...@bigpond.com
>
>? What bothered me most, is that the device is a "one shot", IOW it gets
>destroyed
>and replaced with each reaction. Now I haven't run the numbers, but intuitively
>I suspect that
From: mix...@bigpond.com
➢ What bothered me most, is that the device is a "one shot", IOW it gets
destroyed
and replaced with each reaction. Now I haven't run the numbers, but intuitively
I suspect that the cost of the little device is going to exceed the monetary
value of the energy produced in
In reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Sat, 16 Dec 2017 16:47:14
+:
Hi,
[snip]
>I checked to see if the reports say anything about gammas or neutrons
>associated with the B-11 fusion reaction or what happens to B-10, which is
>about 20% of natural boron. There may be activation
ect: Re: [Vo]:Breakthroughs in Laser Fusion Gives Billion TimesImprovement
In Yield
IMHO, the muons come from hadronization of the energy stored by the metallic
hydrogen. The energy transferred from hadron decay to the metallic hydrogen
accumulates and is eventually converted to mesons. This energy storag
IMHO, the muons come from hadronization of the energy stored by the
metallic hydrogen. The energy transferred from hadron decay to the metallic
hydrogen accumulates and is eventually converted to mesons. This energy
storage mechanism might be disrupted through the destruction of the
metallic
From: Axil Axil
➢ But Holmlid get a high energy reaction from excitation from a very low
powered laser. A petawatt laser is extreme overkill.
Yes - but the problem with the Holmlid approach (if we take his claims at face
value) is that the output energy is largely in the form of muons.
From: Axil Axil
➢ But Holmlid get a high energy reaction from excitation from a very low
powered laser. A petawatt laser is extreme overkill.
Yes - but the problem with the Holmlid approach (if we take his claims at face
value) is that the output energy is largely in the form of muons.
14 matches
Mail list logo